• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA II)固定后股骨转子间骨折机械性失败的危险因素:一项针对东南亚人群的研究

Risk factors for mechanical failure of intertrochanteric fractures after fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA II): a study in a Southeast Asian population.

作者信息

Zhang Wei, Antony Xavier Rex Premchand, Decruz Joshua, Chen Ying Dong, Park Derek Howard

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, 90 Yishun Central, Singapore, 768828, Singapore.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Apr;141(4):569-575. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03399-2. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-020-03399-2
PMID:32296964
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Intertrochanteric hip fractures pose a significant health problem. The proximal femur nail anti-rotation (PFNA IIDePuySynthes) is the most commonly used implant for intramedullary nailing of unstable intertrochanteric fractures at our institution. We aim to identify the risk factors predisposing to mechanical failure of intertrochanteric hip fractures fixation with PFNAII in our Southeast Asian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 295 consecutive patients who underwent PFNA fixation for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur between January 2014 and June 2018 at our institution. Exclusion criteria included a follow-up period of less than 4 months and patients with polytrauma. 204 patients were eligible for analysis, of which 22 had mechanical failure of PFNAII. We compared these patients with respect to their demographics, medical co-morbidities, quality of reduction according to the Baumgartner scale, calcar restoration, blade position according to Cleveland Zones, the stability of fracture according to OTA/AO classification, neck-shaft-angle, tip-apex distance, as well as neck of femur bone mineral density T-score. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 4 months and until fracture union or complication had occurred. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the odds ratio for mechanical failure for selected variables.

RESULTS

Good quality of reduction reduced risk of mechanical failure whilst posterior blade position in lateral hip X-ray predicted it, with odds ratios of 0.147 (95% confidence interval, 0.030-0.733; p = 0.019) and12.12 (95% confidence interval, 1.583-92.825; p = 0.016) respectively. On univariate analysis, the mechanical failure group were older, had poorer calcar restoration, more unstable fracture patterns, more varus neck-shaft angle, and trochanteric starting points that were lateral to or on the tip of the greater trochanter. However, these were not significant in multivariate analysis. Tip apex distance, the severity of osteoporosis, presence of diabetes, chronic kidney disease and serum vitamin D levels were not significant predictors of failure.

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid mechanical failure, one should aim to achieve a good quality of reduction and centre blade position on lateral hip X-ray. Tip apex distance did not predict mechanical failure in our study.

摘要

引言

股骨转子间髋部骨折是一个严重的健康问题。股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA II,德普伊辛迪斯公司生产)是我院治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折最常用的髓内固定植入物。我们旨在确定在我们的东南亚人群中,导致PFNA II固定的股骨转子间髋部骨折发生机械性失效的危险因素。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了2014年1月至2018年6月在我院接受PFNA固定治疗股骨近端转子间骨折的295例连续患者。排除标准包括随访期少于4个月以及多发伤患者。204例患者符合分析条件,其中22例发生了PFNA II的机械性失效。我们比较了这些患者的人口统计学特征、合并疾病、根据鲍姆加特纳量表评估的复位质量、股骨距恢复情况、根据克利夫兰分区评估的刀片位置、根据OTA/AO分类评估的骨折稳定性、颈干角、尖顶距以及股骨颈骨密度T值。患者至少随访4个月,直至骨折愈合或出现并发症。进行逻辑回归分析以确定所选变量发生机械性失效的比值比。

结果

良好的复位质量可降低机械性失效风险,而髋部侧位X线片显示刀片位于后方则预示着机械性失效,比值比分别为0.147(95%置信区间,0.030 - 0.733;p = 0.019)和12.12(95%置信区间,1.583 - 92.825;p = 0.016)。单因素分析显示,机械性失效组患者年龄较大,股骨距恢复较差,骨折模式更不稳定,颈干角内翻更多,且转子起始点位于大转子尖端外侧或尖端处。然而,在多因素分析中这些因素并不显著。尖顶距、骨质疏松严重程度、糖尿病的存在、慢性肾脏病以及血清维生素D水平均不是失效的显著预测因素。

结论

为避免机械性失效,应努力实现良好的复位质量,并使髋部侧位X线片上的刀片位于中心位置。在我们的研究中,尖顶距并不能预测机械性失效。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for mechanical failure of intertrochanteric fractures after fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA II): a study in a Southeast Asian population.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA II)固定后股骨转子间骨折机械性失败的危险因素:一项针对东南亚人群的研究
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Apr;141(4):569-575. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03399-2. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Comparison of radiological and functional outcome of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated using PFN and PFNA-2 in patients with osteoporosis.骨质疏松症患者中使用PFN和PFNA-2治疗不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的放射学和功能结果比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Jul;29(5):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02401-x. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
3
Rewriting the tip apex distance for the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation.重新计算股骨近端抗旋髓内钉的尖顶距。
Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1843-1847. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
4
Risk factors for implant failure in reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA).反斜形和横断转子间骨折采用股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗的失败的风险因素。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Nov 8;14(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1414-4.
5
A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly.InterTan钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉亚洲版治疗老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的回顾性分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Jan 15;11:10. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0344-7.
6
Predictors of failure following fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation.股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗转子间骨折失败的预测因素。
Singapore Med J. 2019 Sep;60(9):463-467. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019114.
7
Comparison of the reconstruction trochanteric antigrade nail (TAN) with the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the management of reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fractures.重建型股骨转子顺行髓内钉(TAN)与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗反斜行转子间髋部骨折的比较
Injury. 2015 Dec;46(12):2389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
8
Radiographic and functional results of osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures.使用股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的影像学及功能结果。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(2):127-34. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2237.
9
Should the tip-apex distance (TAD) rule be modified for the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA)? A retrospective study.股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)是否需要修改尖端-顶点距离(TAD)规则?一项回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 Oct 17;8:35. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-35.
10
Is Sliding Compression Necessary for Intramedullary Nailing Fixation of AO/OTA Type A3.3 Intertrochanteric Fracture?AO/OTA 型 A3.3 转子间骨折髓内钉固定是否必需滑动加压?
Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov;15(11):2805-2813. doi: 10.1111/os.13875. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative biomechanical analysis of fracture patterns in ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: an in-silico study.同侧股骨颈和股骨干骨折骨折模式的定量生物力学分析:一项计算机模拟研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Aug 22;13:1641700. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1641700. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of proximal femoral universal nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation internal fixation for older patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a retrospective cohort study.老年股骨转子间骨折患者采用股骨近端通用钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉内固定的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 11;12:1642909. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1642909. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur; a survey of treatment in traction and by internal fixation.股骨转子间骨折;牵引治疗与内固定治疗的调查
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1947 Oct;29(4):1049-67.
2
Treatment of trochanteric fractures with the PFNA (proximal femoral nail antirotation) nail system - report of early results.采用股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA)系统治疗转子间骨折——早期结果报告
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(4):276-9.
3
Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures: management and current controversies.骨质疏松性股骨转子间髋部骨折:治疗与当前争议
Research on Classification Criteria for the Reducibility and Irreducibility of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures.
股骨转子间骨折可复性与不可复性分类标准的研究
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(6):1852-1866. doi: 10.1111/os.70055. Epub 2025 May 3.
4
Predicting mechanical complications in proximal femoral nailing for elderly patients: a radiological scoring system based on a single-centre retrospective cohort with 586 cases.预测老年患者股骨近端髓内钉固定术后的机械并发症:基于一项包含586例病例的单中心回顾性队列研究的放射学评分系统
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Apr 12;51(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02850-6.
5
The proximal femoral universal nail system (PFUN): a novel intramedullary nail for treating complex proximal femoral fractures and its biomechanical comparison with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA).股骨近端通用钉系统(PFUN):一种用于治疗复杂股骨近端骨折的新型髓内钉及其与股骨近端抗旋转髓内钉(PFNA)的生物力学比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Mar 26;20(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05724-0.
6
Construction and validation of a nomogram prediction model for internal fixation failure after proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nailing in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.股骨转子间骨折近端股骨抗旋转髓内钉内固定术后内固定失败的列线图预测模型的构建与验证
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 22;103(47):e40575. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040575.
7
Conversion hip arthroplasty for failed nailing of intertrochanteric fracture: Reflections on some important aspects.股骨转子间骨折髓内钉固定失败后的髋关节置换术:对一些重要方面的思考
World J Orthop. 2024 Oct 18;15(10):997-1000. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i10.997.
8
Flexible reamer use to overcome entry point errors in proximal femoral nail application in severe obese intertrochanteric fracture patients.在严重肥胖的股骨转子间骨折患者中应用股骨近端髓内钉时,使用弹性扩髓器可纠正进钉点错误。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 14;25(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07933-w.
9
Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation and artificial hip replacement for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures.老年股骨转子间骨折患者股骨近端抗旋髓内钉内固定与人工髋关节置换的比较
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Aug 15;16(8):4154-4162. doi: 10.62347/ZDCU6933. eCollection 2024.
10
Biomechanical difference analysis of new and classic intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of basal femoral neck fractures: finite element analysis.新型与经典髓内钉装置治疗股骨颈基底部骨折的生物力学差异分析:有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 2;25(1):697. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07830-2.
Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:441-54.