Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):1420-1429. doi: 10.1111/jce.14501. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
Electrophysiological properties of reentry circuits of fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (F/S-AVNRT) may contribute to cyclic variability after atrial induction.
In 156 atrial inductions of 33 patients with F/S-AVNRT, we measured the atrio-His (AH) and His-atrial (HA) intervals in the first cycle after the induction (AH[1] and HA[1], respectively), those in the second cycle (AH [2] and HA [2], respectively), and those during tachycardia that maintained a stable cycle length AH[T] and HA[T], respectively), and calculated the value of AH(1) minus AH(T) [ΔAH] and the value of HA(1) minus HA(T) [ΔHA] in each induction. According to the sum of ΔAH and ΔHA, tachycardia variability was classified as incremental (<-20), balanced (-20 to 20), or decremental (>20).
ΔAH and ΔHA were significantly different between the three responses: 6 ± 28 and -67 ± 39 in 55 inductions (35%) with an incremental response, 20 ± 10 and -23 ± 28 in 59 (38%) with a balanced response, and 54 ± 44 and 4 ± 50 in 42 (27%) with a decremental response, respectively. Incremental response was reproducibly and consistently observed in 33% of patients. HA(2) was similar to HA(T) in inductions with an incremental response. These results suggest that incremental response can be manifested only in the first cycle when HA(1) is excessively shortened, approximating a retrograde conduction time over a slow pathway, in contrast, and far superior to a decremental delay of AH(1).
In specific patients with F/S-AVNRT, poorly recognized, electrophysiological properties of shortening a retrograde conduction time over a slow pathway was manifested during atrial induction.
快-慢房室结折返性心动过速(F/S-AVNRT)折返环的电生理特性可能导致心房激动后心动周期的周期性变化。
在 33 例 F/S-AVNRT 患者的 156 次心房激动中,我们测量了激动后第一个心动周期的房室结(AH)和希氏束-心房(HA)间期(分别为 AH[1]和 HA[1])、第二个心动周期的 AH[2]和 HA[2]间期以及维持稳定心动周期长度的心动过速时的 AH[T]和 HA[T]间期),并计算了每个激动中 AH[1]与 AH[T]之差(ΔAH)和 HA[1]与 HA[T]之差(ΔHA)。根据ΔAH和ΔHA的总和,将心动过速的变化性分为递增型(<-20)、平衡型(-20 至 20)或递减型(>20)。
三种反应的ΔAH和ΔHA明显不同:55 次(35%)激动表现为递增反应时,ΔAH为 6±28,ΔHA为-67±39;59 次(38%)激动表现为平衡反应时,ΔAH为 20±10,ΔHA为-23±28;42 次(27%)激动表现为递减反应时,ΔAH为 54±44,ΔHA为 4±50。递增反应在 33%的患者中可重复且一致地观察到。在表现为递增反应的激动中,HA[2]与 HA[T]相似。这些结果表明,只有在 HA[1]过度缩短,近似于慢径逆行传导时间的第一个心动周期中,才会表现出递增反应,而与 AH[1]的递减延迟相比,这种反应具有明显的优势。
在特定的 F/S-AVNRT 患者中,在心房激动时表现出了一种不被广泛认识的电生理特性,即缩短慢径逆行传导时间。