• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良根治性前列腺切除术治疗高级别前列腺癌尿失禁的疗效。

Efficacy of modified radical prostatectomy technique for recovery of urinary incontinence in high-grade prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.

Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, South Korea.

出版信息

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Oct;72(5):605-614. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03633-4. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03633-4
PMID:32298065
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to evaluate predictive factors of urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-grade prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

A total of 241 patients with high-grade (Gleason Score 8 or 9) PCa who underwent RP in a single Korean center between January 2011 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Urinary continence was defined as no pads use. Urinary continence was evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RP. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors of urinary continence recovery after RP.

RESULTS

The mean age was 67.6±6.4 years, and the mean PSA was 18.7±21.1 ng/dL. A total of 197 (81.7%) patients underwent nerve-sparing RP, and 198 patients (82.2%) were continent 1 year after RP. Multivariate analysis showed that the age (odds ratio [OR]=1.091 [1.015-1.172], P=0.018), Body Mass Index (BMI) (OR=1.227 [1.057-1.424], P=0.007), and modified surgical technique (OR=0.109 [0.044-0.267], P<0.001) were independent factors for predicting urinary continence recovery after RP.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger age, low BMI, and modified surgery were independent predictors of urinary continence recovery after RP in patients with high-grade PCa. These findings may help surgeons to give pre- and postoperative advice to patients with high-grade PCa about urinary continence recovery after RP.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估行根治性前列腺切除术(RP)治疗高级别前列腺癌(PCa)后尿控恢复的预测因素。

方法

回顾性分析 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 5 月期间在韩国的单一中心接受 RP 治疗的 241 例高级别(Gleason 评分 8 或 9)PCa 患者。尿控定义为不使用尿垫。术后 1、3、6 和 12 个月评估尿控。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定 RP 后尿控恢复的预测因素。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 67.6±6.4 岁,平均 PSA 为 18.7±21.1ng/dL。197 例(81.7%)患者接受了神经保留 RP,198 例(82.2%)患者在 RP 后 1 年时达到尿控。多因素分析显示,年龄(优势比[OR]=1.091[1.015-1.172],P=0.018)、体重指数(BMI)(OR=1.227[1.057-1.424],P=0.007)和改良手术技术(OR=0.109[0.044-0.267],P<0.001)是预测 RP 后尿控恢复的独立因素。

结论

在高级别 PCa 患者中,年轻、低 BMI 和改良手术是 RP 后尿控恢复的独立预测因素。这些发现可能有助于外科医生向高级别 PCa 患者提供关于 RP 后尿控恢复的术前和术后建议。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of modified radical prostatectomy technique for recovery of urinary incontinence in high-grade prostate cancer.改良根治性前列腺切除术治疗高级别前列腺癌尿失禁的疗效。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Oct;72(5):605-614. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03633-4. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
2
Predictors of urinary continence recovery after modified radical prostatectomy for clinically high-risk prostate cancer.临床高危前列腺癌改良根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁恢复的预测因素
Urol J. 2015 Feb 22;12(1):2021-7.
3
Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques (intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a single-centre study.对于患有勃起功能障碍的男性,我们是否需要保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术技术(筋膜内与筋膜间)?一项单中心研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2015 Mar;33(3):301-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1302-9. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
4
Improving early urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy by applying a sutureless technique for maximal preservation of the intrapelvic urethra: A 17-year single-surgeon experience.应用无缝合技术最大限度地保留盆内尿道以改善根治性前列腺切除术后早期尿控恢复:17 年单外科医生经验。
Urologia. 2020 Nov;87(4):178-184. doi: 10.1177/0391560320925570. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: focus on urinary continence recovery and related complications after 1000 procedures.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的全解剖重建:关注 1000 例手术后尿控恢复和相关并发症。
BJU Int. 2019 Sep;124(3):477-486. doi: 10.1111/bju.14716. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
6
Predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术后即刻控尿的预测因素
World J Urol. 2016 Jan;34(1):113-20. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1594-4. Epub 2015 May 20.
7
Urinary Incontinence and Sexual Function After the Introduction of NeuroSAFE in Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.神经安全技术在前列腺癌根治术中应用后对尿失禁和性功能的影响。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Sep;9(5):824-831. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.021. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
8
Preoperative erectile function represents a significant predictor of postoperative urinary continence recovery in patients treated with bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.术前勃起功能是双侧保留神经根治性前列腺切除术治疗患者术后尿控恢复的重要预测指标。
J Urol. 2012 Feb;187(2):569-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.034. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
9
Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.在根治性前列腺切除术中采用神经保留方法与术后尿控恢复率密切相关。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):717-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11315.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
10
Factors predicting continence recovery 1 month after radical prostatectomy: results of a multicenter survey.预测根治性前列腺切除术后 1 个月控尿恢复的因素:一项多中心调查的结果。
Int J Urol. 2011 Oct;18(10):700-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02826.x. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of nomogram models for predicting urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients.高危前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁预测列线图模型的开发与验证
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):3017-3034. doi: 10.62347/ZYAA3728. eCollection 2025.
2
Is there any difference in urinary continence between bilateral and unilateral nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术中双侧与单侧保留神经对尿控的影响是否存在差异?系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 23;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03340-6.
3
Where do we stand?-Recent update of shock wave therapy as penile rehabilitation for postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction.
我们目前处于什么状况?——冲击波疗法作为前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍阴茎康复治疗的最新进展
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Feb 28;12(2):158-160. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-33. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
4
Urinary Continence Recovery after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy without Anterior or Posterior Reconstruction: Experience from a Tertiary Referral Center.机器人根治性前列腺切除术后无前后部重建的尿失禁恢复:来自三级转诊中心的经验
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 8;12(4):1358. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041358.
5
Role of the JNK Pathway in Bladder Cancer.JNK信号通路在膀胱癌中的作用。
Onco Targets Ther. 2022 Sep 5;15:963-971. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S374908. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of the efficacy of the early LI-SWT plus daily tadalafil with daily tadalafil only as penile rehabilitation for postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction.早期 LI-SWT 联合每日他达拉非与单纯每日他达拉非治疗前列腺癌根治术后勃起功能障碍的疗效比较。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Aug;35(5):447-453. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00560-w. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
7
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:基于证据的比较结果分析。
World J Urol. 2021 Oct;39(10):3721-3732. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03687-5. Epub 2021 Apr 11.