Suppr超能文献

社会经济差异对公共、职业和私人医疗保健的利用:芬兰一项工作年龄人群的注册链接研究。

Socioeconomic differences in use of public, occupational and private health care: A register-linkage study of a working-age population in Finland.

机构信息

Research Unit, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Helsinki, Finland.

Research Unit, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Turku, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231792. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

There is little knowledge on socioeconomic differences in use of health care organized by different care schemes and on exclusive and concurrent use of health care at different schemes in different socioeconomic groups. In Finland, public, occupational and private schemes offer parallel outpatient primary health care services. Each scheme mainly reaches different population groups because of differences in availability, costs and gatekeeping. This study aimed to analyse how the probability of using health care organized by the three schemes differed by socioeconomic status in a working-age population. Individual-level register-based data on use of public, occupational and private outpatient primary health care during 2013 as well as data on sociodemographic covariates were linked for the total population aged 25-64 of the city of Oulu, Finland. Data were analysed with descriptive methods and multinomial logistic regression models. Those in the study population most often used only occupational care or only public care, or did not use any of the studied health care schemes at all. The lower the socioeconomic status, the higher was the probability of not using care or using only public care. The higher the socioeconomic status, the higher was the probability of using occupational care-either only occupational care or occupational care in combination with private care. Education, occupational class and income were all associated with care use also when adjusted for sociodemographic covariates and chronic disease, but income proved to be the strongest predictor of the three. The results reflect the design of the Finnish health care system, with a strong occupational health care scheme for the employed population contributing to inequality in use of health care and potentially to health inequality between socioeconomic groups.

摘要

关于不同医疗计划组织的医疗保健在社会经济差异方面的知识很少,也很少有关于不同社会经济群体在不同计划中同时使用和单独使用医疗保健的知识。在芬兰,公共、职业和私人计划提供并行的门诊初级卫生保健服务。每个计划主要针对不同的人群,因为在可用性、成本和把关方面存在差异。本研究旨在分析在工作年龄人群中,社会经济地位对三种计划组织的医疗保健使用概率的影响。使用 2013 年公共、职业和私人门诊初级卫生保健的基于个体的登记数据以及社会人口学协变量数据,链接了芬兰奥卢市 25-64 岁总人口的数据。使用描述性方法和多项逻辑回归模型进行数据分析。研究人群中最常使用的是职业保健或公共保健,或者根本不使用任何研究的医疗保健计划。社会经济地位越低,不使用保健或只使用公共保健的可能性就越高。社会经济地位越高,使用职业保健的可能性就越高,要么只使用职业保健,要么只使用职业保健与私人保健相结合。即使在调整了社会人口学协变量和慢性病后,教育、职业阶层和收入与保健的使用也存在关联,但收入是这三个因素中最强的预测因素。这些结果反映了芬兰卫生保健系统的设计,该系统为就业人群提供了强大的职业保健计划,这导致了医疗保健使用方面的不平等,并可能导致社会经济群体之间的健康不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e26/7162494/4883fb37c155/pone.0231792.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验