• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济差异对公共、职业和私人医疗保健的利用:芬兰一项工作年龄人群的注册链接研究。

Socioeconomic differences in use of public, occupational and private health care: A register-linkage study of a working-age population in Finland.

机构信息

Research Unit, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Helsinki, Finland.

Research Unit, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Turku, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231792. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0231792
PMID:32298356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7162494/
Abstract

There is little knowledge on socioeconomic differences in use of health care organized by different care schemes and on exclusive and concurrent use of health care at different schemes in different socioeconomic groups. In Finland, public, occupational and private schemes offer parallel outpatient primary health care services. Each scheme mainly reaches different population groups because of differences in availability, costs and gatekeeping. This study aimed to analyse how the probability of using health care organized by the three schemes differed by socioeconomic status in a working-age population. Individual-level register-based data on use of public, occupational and private outpatient primary health care during 2013 as well as data on sociodemographic covariates were linked for the total population aged 25-64 of the city of Oulu, Finland. Data were analysed with descriptive methods and multinomial logistic regression models. Those in the study population most often used only occupational care or only public care, or did not use any of the studied health care schemes at all. The lower the socioeconomic status, the higher was the probability of not using care or using only public care. The higher the socioeconomic status, the higher was the probability of using occupational care-either only occupational care or occupational care in combination with private care. Education, occupational class and income were all associated with care use also when adjusted for sociodemographic covariates and chronic disease, but income proved to be the strongest predictor of the three. The results reflect the design of the Finnish health care system, with a strong occupational health care scheme for the employed population contributing to inequality in use of health care and potentially to health inequality between socioeconomic groups.

摘要

关于不同医疗计划组织的医疗保健在社会经济差异方面的知识很少,也很少有关于不同社会经济群体在不同计划中同时使用和单独使用医疗保健的知识。在芬兰,公共、职业和私人计划提供并行的门诊初级卫生保健服务。每个计划主要针对不同的人群,因为在可用性、成本和把关方面存在差异。本研究旨在分析在工作年龄人群中,社会经济地位对三种计划组织的医疗保健使用概率的影响。使用 2013 年公共、职业和私人门诊初级卫生保健的基于个体的登记数据以及社会人口学协变量数据,链接了芬兰奥卢市 25-64 岁总人口的数据。使用描述性方法和多项逻辑回归模型进行数据分析。研究人群中最常使用的是职业保健或公共保健,或者根本不使用任何研究的医疗保健计划。社会经济地位越低,不使用保健或只使用公共保健的可能性就越高。社会经济地位越高,使用职业保健的可能性就越高,要么只使用职业保健,要么只使用职业保健与私人保健相结合。即使在调整了社会人口学协变量和慢性病后,教育、职业阶层和收入与保健的使用也存在关联,但收入是这三个因素中最强的预测因素。这些结果反映了芬兰卫生保健系统的设计,该系统为就业人群提供了强大的职业保健计划,这导致了医疗保健使用方面的不平等,并可能导致社会经济群体之间的健康不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e26/7162494/00ee14c329ef/pone.0231792.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e26/7162494/4883fb37c155/pone.0231792.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e26/7162494/847763a51ae9/pone.0231792.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e26/7162494/5d4085a69d76/pone.0231792.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e26/7162494/00ee14c329ef/pone.0231792.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e26/7162494/4883fb37c155/pone.0231792.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e26/7162494/847763a51ae9/pone.0231792.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e26/7162494/5d4085a69d76/pone.0231792.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e26/7162494/00ee14c329ef/pone.0231792.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic differences in use of public, occupational and private health care: A register-linkage study of a working-age population in Finland.社会经济差异对公共、职业和私人医疗保健的利用:芬兰一项工作年龄人群的注册链接研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231792. eCollection 2020.
2
Socioeconomic differences in utilization of public and private dental care in Finland: Register-based evidence on a population aged 25 and over.芬兰公共和私人牙科保健利用的社会经济差异:基于登记的 25 岁及以上人群证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 4;16(8):e0255126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255126. eCollection 2021.
3
Private medicine and socioeconomic differences in the rates of common surgical procedures in Finland.芬兰私立医疗与常见外科手术率的社会经济差异。
Health Policy. 1996 Jun;36(3):245-59. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00816-0.
4
Use of outpatient and inpatient health care services by occupation-a register study of employees in Oulu, Finland.职业人群的门诊和住院医疗服务利用情况——芬兰奥卢的一项员工登记研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 3;22(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07970-y.
5
Frequent attenders of three outpatient health care schemes in Finland: characteristics and association with long-term sickness absences, 2016-2018.2016 - 2018年芬兰三个门诊医疗保健计划的频繁就诊者:特征及其与长期病假的关联
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 6;21(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10866-x.
6
The contribution of health selection to occupational status inequality in Germany - differences by gender and between the public and private sectors.健康选择对德国职业地位不平等的贡献——性别差异和公私部门差异。
Public Health. 2016 Apr;133:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.10.022. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Social disparities in the use of ART treatment: a national register-based cross-sectional study among women in Denmark.社会差异对 ART 治疗的影响:丹麦全国注册登记库的一项基于横断面的女性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Mar 1;38(3):503-510. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac247.
8
Employment status and differences in the one-year coverage of physician visits: different needs or unequal access to services?就业状况与一年内科医生就诊覆盖率的差异:是不同需求还是服务获取不平等?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct 2;6:123. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-123.
9
Past and present socioeconomic circumstances and psychotropic medication: a register-linkage study.过去和现在的社会经济状况与精神药物:一项登记关联研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1143-51. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200036. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
10
Midlife socioeconomic position and old-age dementia mortality: a large prospective register-based study from Finland.中年社会经济地位与老年痴呆症死亡率:来自芬兰的一项大型前瞻性基于登记的研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 6;10(1):e033234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033234.

引用本文的文献

1
Overuse of medical imaging and effects of payer-provider integration: quasi-experimental evidence from Finland.医学影像的过度使用及支付方与医疗服务提供者整合的影响:来自芬兰的准实验证据
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00592-0.
2
Patient-Related Factors Associated With the Initiation of Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Home Care: An Observational Study Based on Resident Assessment Instrument Data.与家庭护理中潜在不适当用药起始相关的患者因素:一项基于居民评估工具数据的观察性研究
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Feb;136(2):e14125. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.14125.
3
Prescribing patterns before the initiation of novel antidiabetic medicines in public, occupational, and private healthcare: a register study reflecting the guidelines of care in type 2 diabetes.

本文引用的文献

1
Finland: Health System Review.芬兰:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2019 Aug;21(2):1-166.
2
Task shifting from physicians to nurses in primary care in 39 countries: a cross-country comparative study.39个国家基层医疗中任务从医生向护士的转移:一项跨国比较研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Dec;26(6):927-934. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw098. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
3
Socioeconomic patterns in use of private and public health services in Spain and Britain: implications for equity in health care.西班牙和英国私立与公立医疗服务使用中的社会经济模式:对医疗保健公平性的影响
公共、职业和私人医疗保健领域新型抗糖尿病药物启用前的处方模式:一项反映2型糖尿病护理指南的登记研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1553. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12010-y.
4
Coverage of mammography imaging in and outside an organized breast cancer screening program - variation by age and sociodemographic groups.在有组织的乳腺癌筛查计划内外进行乳房 X 光成像检查的覆盖情况 - 按年龄和社会人口统计学分组的差异。
Acta Oncol. 2024 Oct 29;63:833-840. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40830.
5
Experiences in healthcare for weight management - a qualitative interview study of retired individuals with obesity and low or high education.体重管理方面的医疗保健经验——一项针对肥胖且受教育程度较低或较高的退休个体的定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 26;24(1):1285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11777-4.
6
The differences of metabolic profiles, socioeconomic status and diabetic retinopathy in U.S. working-age and elderly adults with diabetes: results from NHANES 1999-2018.美国糖尿病工作年龄和老年成年人的代谢谱、社会经济地位及糖尿病视网膜病变差异:1999 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查结果
Acta Diabetol. 2025 Jan;62(1):25-34. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02328-8. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
7
Social Mobility and Health-Related Quality of Life Trajectory Classes Among Older Women and Men.老年女性和男性的社会流动性与健康相关生活质量轨迹类别
J Aging Health. 2025 Mar;37(3-4):220-232. doi: 10.1177/08982643241242513. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
8
Self-identified barriers to health services among migrants 50 years of age or older: population-based survey study of Russian speakers in Finland.50 岁及以上移民人群对健康服务的自我认定障碍:芬兰俄语使用者的基于人群调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 27;24(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10728-3.
9
Identifying user profiles of healthcare, social and employment services in a working-age population: A cluster analysis with linked individual-level register data from Finland.在工作年龄人群中识别医疗保健、社会和就业服务的用户特征:一项基于芬兰个体层面登记数据的聚类分析
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 1;18(11):e0293622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293622. eCollection 2023.
10
Use of outpatient healthcare services before and after the onset of unemployment: A register-based propensity score matched study from Finland.使用门诊医疗服务之前和之后的失业:一个基于登记的倾向评分匹配研究来自芬兰。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 9;18(8):e0288423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288423. eCollection 2023.
Health Place. 2014 Jan;25:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
4
Socioeconomic differences in healthcare utilization, with and without adjustment for need: an example from Stockholm, Sweden.社会经济差异对医疗保健利用的影响,以及是否根据需要进行调整:来自瑞典斯德哥尔摩的一个例子。
Scand J Public Health. 2013 May;41(3):318-25. doi: 10.1177/1403494812473205. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
5
The impact of out-of-pocket payments on prevention and health-related lifestyle: a systematic literature review.自付费用对预防和与健康相关的生活方式的影响:系统文献回顾。
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Feb;23(1):74-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks034. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
6
Do women consult more than men? A review of gender and consultation for back pain and headache.女性比男性就诊更多吗?对背痛和头痛的性别和就诊情况的综述。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Apr;16(2):108-17. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.009131. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
7
Measurement of horizontal inequity in health care utilisation using European panel data.利用欧洲面板数据衡量医疗保健利用中的横向不平等。
J Health Econ. 2009 Mar;28(2):280-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
8
Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care.公共和私人卫生服务利用中的社会经济模式与医疗保健公平性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 14;8:183. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-183.
9
Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries.发达国家中按收入划分的医疗服务可及性不平等现象。
CMAJ. 2006 Jan 17;174(2):177-83. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050584.
10
Access to health care resources in the UK: the case of care for arthritis.英国医疗保健资源的获取:以关节炎护理为例。
Health Econ. 2005 Apr;14(4):391-406. doi: 10.1002/hec.978.