Suppr超能文献

头颈部软组织肉瘤生存的风险因素:第 7 版和第 8 版 AJCC 分期系统的比较。

Risk factors for survival of head and neck soft tissue sarcomas: A comparison between 7th and 8th edition AJCC staging systems.

机构信息

Departments of Otolaryngology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2020 Jul;106:104705. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104705. Epub 2020 Apr 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck (HNSTS) show various histological types and clinical behaviour. Recently, the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) proposed a staging system for HNSTS independent of other body soft tissue sarcomas, which requires validation. Therefore, we evaluated the prognostic factors for the survival of HNSTS patients through a comparison between previous and current AJCC staging systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study involved 135 consecutive HNSTS patients who underwent primary surgery, chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. Patients were grouped into staged (S) and not staged (NS) cancer according to the AJCC 8th edition staging. Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) in all, S or NS patients.

RESULTS

Median follow-up period was 75 months and the 5-year OS and PFS rates of all patients were 67.8% and 53.4%, respectively, which was similar between S and NS groups. Age, tumour size and grade, overall stage (7th edition) and resection margin were the significant prognostic factors for OS and PFS in all patients and NS group (all P < 0.05), whereas positive resection margin was the only significant factor for OS and PFS in the S group (P < 0.001). While OS was poorly discriminated among different 8th edition T-categories, different 7th edition showed good discrimination among overall stages in all patients and the NS group.

CONCLUSION

The revised staging system may not provide an improved risk stratification for survival of HNSTS patients.

摘要

目的

头颈部软组织肉瘤(HNSTS)表现出多种组织学类型和临床行为。最近,第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)提出了一种独立于其他身体软组织肉瘤的 HNSTS 分期系统,需要验证。因此,我们通过比较之前和当前的 AJCC 分期系统,评估了 HNSTS 患者生存的预后因素。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 135 例连续接受原发手术、放化疗或化疗的 HNSTS 患者。根据 AJCC 第 8 版分期,患者分为分期(S)和未分期(NS)癌症。采用 Cox 比例风险回归分析,确定所有、S 或 NS 患者的总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)相关因素。

结果

中位随访时间为 75 个月,所有患者的 5 年 OS 和 PFS 率分别为 67.8%和 53.4%,S 组和 NS 组之间无显著差异。年龄、肿瘤大小和分级、总体分期(第 7 版)和切缘是所有患者和 NS 组 OS 和 PFS 的显著预后因素(均 P<0.05),而切缘阳性是 S 组 OS 和 PFS 的唯一显著因素(P<0.001)。虽然第 8 版的不同 T 分期对 OS 的区分较差,但不同的第 7 版在所有患者和 NS 组的总体分期中对 OS 有较好的区分。

结论

修订后的分期系统可能无法为 HNSTS 患者的生存提供更好的风险分层。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验