Department of Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Apr 16;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00548-7.
Although desire to die of varying intensity and permanence is frequent in patients receiving palliative care, uncertainty exists concerning appropriate therapeutic responses to it. To support health professionals in dealing with patients´ potential desire to die, a training program and a semi-structured clinical approach was developed. This study aimed for a revision of and consensus building on the clinical approach to support proactively addressing desire to die and routine exploration of death and dying distress.
Within a sequential mixed methods design, we invited 16 palliative patients to participate in semi-structured interviews and 377 (inter-)national experts to attend a two-round Delphi process. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis and an agreement consensus for the Delphi was determined according to predefined criteria.
11 (69%) patients from different settings participated in face-to-face interviews. As key issues for conversations on desire to die they pointed out the relationship between professionals and patients, the setting and support from external experts, if required. A set of 149 (40%) experts (132/89% from Germany, 17/11% from 9 other countries) evaluated ten domains of the semi-structured clinical approach. There was immediate consensus on nine domains concerning conversation design, suggestions for (self-)reflection, and further recommended action. The one domain in which consensus was not achieved until the second round was "proactively addressing desire to die".
We have provided the first semi-structured clinical approach to identify and address desire to die and to respond therapeutically - based on evidence, patients' views and consensus among professional experts.
The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012988; registration date: 27.9.2017) and in the Health Services Research Database (VfD_DEDIPOM_17_003889; registration date: 14.9.2017).
在接受姑息治疗的患者中,不同程度和持续时间的死亡意愿经常出现,但对于如何恰当回应这种意愿仍存在不确定性。为了帮助卫生专业人员应对患者潜在的死亡意愿,我们开发了一种培训计划和半结构化临床方法。本研究旨在修订和达成共识,以支持积极处理死亡意愿,并常规探讨死亡和濒死痛苦。
在顺序混合方法设计中,我们邀请了 16 名姑息治疗患者参加半结构化访谈,并邀请了 377 名(国际)专家参加两轮 Delphi 流程。使用定性内容分析对访谈进行分析,并根据预设标准确定 Delphi 的共识。
来自不同环境的 11 名(69%)患者参加了面对面访谈。他们指出,在涉及死亡意愿的对话中,关键问题是专业人员与患者之间的关系、环境以及外部专家的支持(如果需要的话)。一组 149 名(40%)专家(132/89%来自德国,17/11%来自其他 9 个国家)评估了半结构化临床方法的十个领域。关于对话设计、(自我)反思建议以及进一步推荐行动的九个领域立即达成共识。直到第二轮才达成共识的一个领域是“积极处理死亡意愿”。
我们提供了第一个半结构化的临床方法,用于识别和处理死亡意愿,并根据证据、患者的观点和专业专家的共识进行治疗性回应。
该研究在德国临床试验注册处(DRKS00012988;注册日期:2017 年 9 月 27 日)和卫生服务研究数据库(VfD_DEDIPOM_17_003889;注册日期:2017 年 9 月 14 日)进行了注册。