Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/MayoNamasivayam.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 21;75(15):1758-1769. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.046.
Aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1.0 cm is a defining characteristic of severe aortic stenosis (AS). AVA can be underestimated at low transvalvular flow rate. Yet, the impact of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA ≤1.0 cm is unknown and is not incorporated into AS assessment.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA in AS.
In total, 1,131 patients with moderate or severe AS and complete clinical follow-up were included as part of a longitudinal database. The effect of flow rate (ratio of stroke volume to ejection time) on prognostic value of AVA ≤1.0 cm for time to death was evaluated, adjusting for confounders. Sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff for prognostic threshold of AVA. The findings were validated in a separate external longitudinal cohort of 939 patients.
Flow rate had a significant effect on prognostic value of AVA. AVA ≤1.0 cm was not prognostic for mortality (p = 0.15) if AVA was measured at flow rates below median (≤242 ml/s). In contrast, AVA ≤1.0 cm was highly prognostic for mortality (p = 0.003) if AVA was measured at flow rates above median (>242 ml/s). Findings were irrespective of multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and surgical/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (as time-dependent covariates); comorbidities; medications; and echocardiographic features. AVA ≤1.0 cm was also not an independent predictor of mortality below median flow rate in the validation cohort. The optimal flow rate cutoff for prognostic threshold was 210 ml/s.
Transvalvular flow rate determines prognostic value of AVA in AS. AVA measured at low flow rate is not a good prognostic marker and therefore not a good diagnostic marker for truly severe AS. Flow rate assessment should be incorporated into clinical diagnosis, classification, and prognosis of AS.
主动脉瓣口面积(AVA)≤1.0cm 是重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的一个明确特征。在低跨瓣流速时,AVA 可能会被低估。然而,流速对 AVA≤1.0cm 的预后价值的影响尚不清楚,也未被纳入 AS 评估中。
本研究旨在评估流速对 AS 中 AVA 预后价值的影响。
共纳入 1131 例中重度 AS 且具有完整临床随访的患者,作为一项纵向数据库的一部分。评估流速(每搏量与射血时间之比)对 AVA≤1.0cm 预测死亡时间的预后价值的影响,同时调整混杂因素。进行敏感性分析以确定 AVA 预后阈值的最佳截断值。在另一个独立的 939 例纵向队列中对研究结果进行验证。
流速对 AVA 的预后价值有显著影响。如果 AVA 是在低于中位数(≤242ml/s)的流速下测量的,则 AVA≤1.0cm 对死亡率没有预测价值(p=0.15)。相比之下,如果 AVA 是在高于中位数(>242ml/s)的流速下测量的,则 AVA≤1.0cm 对死亡率有高度的预测价值(p=0.003)。这些发现独立于年龄、性别和外科/经导管主动脉瓣置换(作为时间依赖性协变量)、合并症、药物和超声心动图特征的多变量调整;在验证队列中,在低于中位数流速下,AVA≤1.0cm 也不是死亡率的独立预测因子。预测阈值的最佳流速截断值为 210ml/s。
跨瓣流速决定了 AS 中 AVA 的预后价值。在低流速下测量的 AVA 不是一个良好的预后标志物,因此也不是真正重度 AS 的良好诊断标志物。流速评估应纳入 AS 的临床诊断、分类和预后。