• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有效的糖尿病并发症管理是迈向碳高效星球的一步:一项经济模型研究。

Effective diabetes complication management is a step toward a carbon-efficient planet: an economic modeling study.

作者信息

Fordham Ric, Dhatariya Ketan, Stancliffe Rachel, Lloyd Adam, Chatterjee Mou, Mathew Mevin, Taneja Loveleen, Gains Mike, Haagen Panton Ulrik

机构信息

The Health Economics Group, University of East Anglia Norwich Medical School, Norwich, UK.

Elsie Bertram Diabetes Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Apr;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001017.

DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001017
PMID:32299897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7199151/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of diabetes-related complications accounts for a large share of total carbon dioxide equivalent (COe) emissions. We assessed whether improving diabetes control in people with type 2 diabetes reduces COe emissions, compared with those with unchanging glycemic control.

METHODS

Using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model, we estimated the impact of maintaining glycated hemoglobin (HbA) at 7% (53 mmol/mol) or reducing it by 1% (11 mmol/mol) on total COe/patient and COe/life-year (LY). Two different cohorts were investigated: those on first-line medical therapy (cohort 1) and those on third-line therapy (cohort 2). COe was estimated using cost inputs converted to carbon inputs using the UK National Health Service's carbon intensity factor. The model was run over a 50-year time horizon, discounting total costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) up to 5% and COe at 0%.

RESULTS

Maintaining HbA at 7% (53 mmol/mol) reduced total COe/patient by 18% (1546 kgCOe/patient) vs 13% (937 kgCOe/patient) in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, and led to a reduction in COe/LY gain of 15%-20%. Reducing HbA by 1% (11 mmol/mol) caused a 12% (cohort 1) and 9% (cohort 2) reduction in COe/patient with a COe/LY gain reduction of 11%-14%.

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing people with untreated diabetes, maintaining glycemic control at 7% (53 mmol/mol) on a single agent or improving HbA by 1% (11 mmol/mol) by the addition of more glucose-lowering treatment was associated with a reduction in carbon emissions.

摘要

背景

糖尿病相关并发症的管理在二氧化碳当量(COe)排放总量中占很大比例。我们评估了与血糖控制不变的2型糖尿病患者相比,改善血糖控制是否能减少COe排放。

方法

使用艾昆纬核心糖尿病模型,我们估计了将糖化血红蛋白(HbA)维持在7%(53 mmol/mol)或将其降低1%(11 mmol/mol)对每位患者的总COe以及每生命年(LY)的COe的影响。研究了两个不同的队列:一线药物治疗患者(队列1)和三线治疗患者(队列2)。使用英国国家医疗服务体系的碳强度因子将成本投入转换为碳投入来估算COe。该模型在50年的时间范围内运行,总成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)按最高5%进行贴现,COe按0%进行贴现。

结果

在队列1和队列2中,将HbA维持在7%(53 mmol/mol)分别使每位患者的总COe降低了18%(1546 kgCOe/患者)和13%(937 kgCOe/患者),并使每获得一个LY的COe降低了15% - 20%。将HbA降低1%(11 mmol/mol)使每位患者的COe降低了12%(队列1)和9%(队列2),每获得一个LY的COe降低了11% - 14%。

结论

与未治疗的糖尿病患者相比,使用单一药物将血糖控制维持在7%(53 mmol/mol)或通过增加更多降糖治疗使HbA改善1%(11 mmol/mol)与碳排放减少相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/870d/7199151/a10002a2cb52/bmjdrc-2019-001017f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/870d/7199151/851a1e2dcbf0/bmjdrc-2019-001017f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/870d/7199151/bb2c86a251da/bmjdrc-2019-001017f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/870d/7199151/44823f7b3bab/bmjdrc-2019-001017f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/870d/7199151/a10002a2cb52/bmjdrc-2019-001017f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/870d/7199151/851a1e2dcbf0/bmjdrc-2019-001017f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/870d/7199151/bb2c86a251da/bmjdrc-2019-001017f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/870d/7199151/44823f7b3bab/bmjdrc-2019-001017f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/870d/7199151/a10002a2cb52/bmjdrc-2019-001017f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Effective diabetes complication management is a step toward a carbon-efficient planet: an economic modeling study.有效的糖尿病并发症管理是迈向碳高效星球的一步:一项经济模型研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Apr;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001017.
2
Evaluating the burden of poor glycemic control associated with therapeutic inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK.评估英国 2 型糖尿病患者治疗惰性相关的血糖控制不佳负担。
J Med Econ. 2020 Jan;23(1):98-105. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1645018. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
3
Improving management of glycaemic control in people with T2DM in primary care: estimation of the impact on the clinical complications and associated costs.改善初级保健中 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制管理:对临床并发症及相关成本影响的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05360-w.
4
Evaluation of the Clinical and Economic Burden of Poor Glycemic Control Associated with Therapeutic Inertia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States.评估美国 2 型糖尿病患者因治疗惰性导致的血糖控制不佳的临床和经济负担。
Adv Ther. 2020 Feb;37(2):869-882. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01199-8. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
5
HBA1C CONTROL AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS INITIATED ON CANAGLIFLOZIN OR A GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE 1 RECEPTOR AGONIST IN A REAL-WORLD SETTING.在真实世界环境中,接受坎格列净或胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的 HBA1C 控制和成本效益。
Endocr Pract. 2018 Mar;24(3):273-287. doi: 10.4158/EP-2017-0066.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of the FreeStyle Libre System Versus Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes on Insulin Treatment in Sweden.在瑞典接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,FreeStyle Libre系统与血糖自我监测的成本效益比较
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Dec;12(12):3137-3152. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01172-1. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
7
What to do with diabetes therapies when HbA1c lowering is inadequate: add, switch, or continue? A MASTERMIND study.当 HbA1c 降低不充分时,应如何处理糖尿病治疗药物:加用、转换还是继续使用?一项 MASTERMIND 研究。
BMC Med. 2019 Apr 12;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1307-8.
8
Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation.新型 2 型糖尿病血糖控制药物:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(36):1-248. doi: 10.3310/hta14360.
9
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: the SCIPI RCT.1 型糖尿病诊断时采用连续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗儿童和青少年:SCIPI RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(42):1-112. doi: 10.3310/hta22420.
10
The effect of oral diabetes medications on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in Asians in primary care: a retrospective cohort real-world data study.口服糖尿病药物对初级保健中亚洲人糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的影响:一项回顾性队列真实世界数据研究。
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 26;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02221-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambition With Uncertainty: Exploring Policy-Makers' Perspectives on Pathways to Net Zero Healthcare.充满不确定性的雄心:探索政策制定者对医疗保健领域实现净零排放路径的看法。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8440. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8440. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
Health Technology Assessment and Environmental Impact: A Scoping Review of State of Art and Future Perspective.卫生技术评估与环境影响:现状与未来展望的范围综述
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00984-7.
3
Mitigating the environmental effects of healthcare: the role of the endocrinologist.

本文引用的文献

1
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断:
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S13-S28. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S002.
2
INCORPORATING ENVIRONMENTAL OUTCOMES INTO A HEALTH ECONOMIC MODEL.将环境结果纳入健康经济模型。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(6):400-406. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000581. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
3
Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Daily Administered GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the United Kingdom.评估在英国每日使用胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂治疗2型糖尿病的长期成本效益
减轻医疗保健的环境影响:内分泌学家的作用。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2025 Jun;21(6):344-359. doi: 10.1038/s41574-025-01098-9. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
4
Early use of oral semaglutide in the UK: A cost-effectiveness analysis versus continuing metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy.英国早期使用口服司美格鲁肽:与继续使用二甲双胍和 SGLT-2 抑制剂治疗相比的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 29;13(9):e070473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070473.
5
Environmental impact of cardiovascular healthcare.心血管医疗保健的环境影响。
Open Heart. 2023 May;10(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002279.
6
Environmental Sustainability in Respiratory Care: An Overview of the healthCARe-Based envirONmental Cost of Treatment (CARBON) Programme.呼吸治疗中的环境可持续性:基于 healthCARe 的治疗环境成本(CARBON)计划概述。
Adv Ther. 2022 May;39(5):2270-2280. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02076-7. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
7
Long non-coding RNA screening and identification of potential biomarkers for type 2 diabetes.长链非编码 RNA 筛选及 2 型糖尿病潜在生物标志物鉴定。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Apr;36(4):e24280. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24280. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Feb;8(1):129-147. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0219-2. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: new results from the UKPDS (UKPDS 84).糖尿病相关并发症对医疗费用的影响:英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS 84)的新结果。
Diabet Med. 2015 Apr;32(4):459-66. doi: 10.1111/dme.12647. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
5
Validation of the IMS CORE Diabetes Model.IMS核心糖尿病模型的验证
Value Health. 2014 Sep;17(6):714-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.007.
6
Inpatient dysglycemia and clinical outcomes: association or causation?住院患者血糖异常与临床结局:关联还是因果关系?
J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(4):427-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
7
Frequency of hypoglycemia and its impact on length of stay, mortality, and short-term readmission in patients with diabetes hospitalized in internal medicine wards.低血糖的发生率及其对在内科病房住院的糖尿病患者住院时间、死亡率和短期再入院率的影响。
Endocr Pract. 2014 Sep;20(9):870-5. doi: 10.4158/EP14006.OR.
8
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012.2012 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1033-46. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2625. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
Estimating the financial cost of chronic kidney disease to the NHS in England.估算英格兰国民保健制度中慢性肾脏病的财务成本。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Oct;27 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii73-80. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs269. Epub 2012 Aug 5.
10
Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs.估算英国 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的当前和未来成本,包括直接健康成本以及间接的社会和生产力成本。
Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03698.x.