• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The uptake of predictive DNA testing in 40 families with a pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 variant. An evaluation of the proband-mediated procedure.40 个携带有致病性 BRCA1/BRCA2 变异的家庭对预测性 DNA 检测的接受情况。对先证者介导程序的评估。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Aug;28(8):1020-1027. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0618-8. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
2
Does a proactive procedure lead to a higher uptake of predictive testing in families with a pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 variant? A family cancer clinic evaluation.主动的程序是否会导致携带致病性 BRCA1/BRCA2 变异的家族中接受预测性检测的比例更高?家族癌症诊所的评估。
J Genet Couns. 2024 Jun;33(3):615-622. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1767. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
3
Statewide Retrospective Review of Familial Pancreatic Cancer in Delaware, and Frequency of Genetic Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer Kindreds.特拉华州家族性胰腺癌的全州回顾性研究以及胰腺癌家族中基因突变的频率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1729-35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5026-x. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
4
A clinically structured and partnered approach to genetic testing in Trinidadian women with breast cancer and their families.特立尼达和多巴哥乳腺癌女性及其家族的临床结构化和合作式基因检测方法。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(2):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5045-y. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
5
Post-mortem testing; germline BRCA1/2 variant detection using archival FFPE non-tumor tissue. A new paradigm in genetic counseling.尸检检测;使用存档福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)非肿瘤组织检测种系BRCA1/2变异。遗传咨询的一种新范式。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Aug;24(8):1104-11. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.268. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
6
The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice.遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌和林奇综合征的症状前基因检测应用:文献系统综述及对临床实践的启示
Fam Cancer. 2019 Jan;18(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0089-z.
7
Prevalence of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in a Brazilian population sample at-risk for hereditary breast cancer and characterization of its genetic ancestry.巴西遗传性乳腺癌高危人群样本中BRCA1/BRCA2突变的患病率及其遗传谱系特征
Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 6;7(49):80465-80481. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12610.
8
Feasibility of targeted cascade genetic testing in the family members of BRCA1/2 gene pathogenic variant/likely pathogenic variant carriers.BRCA1/2 基因致病性/可能致病性变异携带者家系成员中靶向级联基因检测的可行性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 3;12(1):1842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05931-3.
9
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Germline Mutation Analysis in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Families from the Aures Region (Eastern Algeria): First Report.阿尔及利亚东部奥雷斯地区遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中BRCA1和BRCA2基因种系突变分析:首次报告
Pathol Oncol Res. 2020 Apr;26(2):715-726. doi: 10.1007/s12253-019-00586-4. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
10
BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: effectiveness of problem-solving training as a counseling intervention.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌家族中的BRCA1/2检测:解决问题培训作为一种咨询干预措施的有效性
Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Oct 15;130A(3):221-7. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30265.

引用本文的文献

1
Cascade Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer Predisposition: Characterization of Patients in a Catchment Area of Southern Italy.遗传性癌症易感性的级联基因检测:意大利南部一个集水区患者的特征分析
Genes (Basel). 2025 Jun 30;16(7):795. doi: 10.3390/genes16070795.
2
Strategies to improve implementation of cascade testing in hereditary cancer syndromes: a systematic review.改善遗传性癌症综合征级联检测实施情况的策略:一项系统综述
NPJ Genom Med. 2024 Apr 3;9(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s41525-024-00412-0.
3
Clinician perspectives on policy approaches to genetic risk disclosure in families.临床医生对家庭遗传风险披露政策方法的看法。
Fam Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):177-186. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00375-2. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
4
Risk-reducing decisions regarding germline pathogenic variant: focusing on the timing of genetic testing and RRSO.针对种系致病性变异的风险降低决策:重点关注基因检测和 RRSO 的时间。
J Med Genet. 2024 Mar 21;61(4):392-398. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109549.
5
Privacy and utility of genetic testing in families with hereditary cancer syndromes living in three countries: the international cascade genetic screening experience.生活在三个国家的遗传性癌症综合征家族中基因检测的隐私与效用:国际级联基因筛查经验
Front Genet. 2023 May 9;14:1109431. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1109431. eCollection 2023.
6
What happens in the long term: Uptake of cancer surveillance and prevention strategies among at-risk relatives with pathogenic variants detected via cascade testing.长期来看:通过级联检测发现致病性变异的高危亲属中癌症监测和预防策略的采用情况。
Cancer. 2022 Dec 15;128(24):4241-4250. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34482. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.遗传性癌症综合征的级联检测:我们是否应该转向直系亲属接触?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 10;40(35):4129-4143. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00303. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
8
Intention to Inform Relatives, Rates of Cascade Testing, and Preference for Patient-Mediated Communication in Families Concerned with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome: The Swiss CASCADE Cohort.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌以及林奇综合征相关家庭中告知亲属的意愿、级联检测率和对患者介导沟通的偏好:瑞士级联队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 23;14(7):1636. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071636.
9
Feasibility of a Traceback Approach for Using Pathology Specimens to Facilitate Genetic Testing in the Genetic Risk Analysis in Ovarian Cancer (GRACE) Study Protocol.在卵巢癌遗传风险分析(GRACE)研究方案中,利用病理标本采用追溯法促进基因检测的可行性。
J Pers Med. 2021 Nov 13;11(11):1194. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111194.
10
A Focus Group Study of Perceptions of Genetic Risk Disclosure in Members of the Public in Sweden: "I'll Phone the Five Closest Ones, but What Happens to the Other Ten?".瑞典公众对基因风险披露认知的焦点小组研究:“我会给最亲近的五个人打电话,但另外十个人怎么办?”
J Pers Med. 2021 Nov 12;11(11):1191. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111191.

40 个携带有致病性 BRCA1/BRCA2 变异的家庭对预测性 DNA 检测的接受情况。对先证者介导程序的评估。

The uptake of predictive DNA testing in 40 families with a pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 variant. An evaluation of the proband-mediated procedure.

机构信息

Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Aug;28(8):1020-1027. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0618-8. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1038/s41431-020-0618-8
PMID:32300191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7381651/
Abstract

When hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) due to a BRCA1/BRCA2 germline pathogenic variant is diagnosed, the proband will be asked to inform other at-risk family members. In the Netherlands, a guideline was introduced in 2012 which provided detailed recommendations regarding this proband-mediated procedure. We now evaluated the uptake of predictive BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in 40 consecutive HBOC families diagnosed in our centre in 2014. We performed a retrospective observational study of all 40 families in which a pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 germline variant was identified during 2014. We scored the uptake of predictive and confirmatory testing by the end of 2018 and explored factors associated with the level of uptake. Two families were excluded. In the remaining 38 families, among 239 family members ≥18 years at 50% risk of being a mutation carrier or at 25% risk if the family member at 50% risk was deceased, 102 (43%) were tested. Among 108 females 25-75 years of age at 50% risk, 59 (55%) underwent predictive or confirmatory testing, and among 43 males at 50% risk with daughters ≥18 years, 22 (51%) were tested. Factors which complicated cascade screening included family members living abroad, probands not wanting to share information and limited pedigree information. In conclusion, the standard proband-mediated procedure of informing relatives seems to be far from optimal. We suggest a tailored approach for each family, including the option of a direct approach to at-risk family members by the geneticist. In addition, we suggest detailed monitoring and follow-up of families.

摘要

当遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)由于 BRCA1/BRCA2 种系致病性变异而被诊断时,将要求先证者告知其他有风险的家族成员。在荷兰,2012 年引入了一项指南,为这种先证者介导的程序提供了详细建议。我们现在评估了在 2014 年我们中心诊断的 40 个连续 HBOC 家族中进行预测性 BRCA1/BRCA2 检测的情况。我们对 2014 年期间在所有 40 个家族中发现致病性 BRCA1/BRCA2 种系变异的家族进行了回顾性观察性研究。我们对截止到 2018 年底的预测性和确认性检测的接受程度进行了评分,并探讨了与接受程度相关的因素。有两个家庭被排除在外。在剩下的 38 个家族中,在 239 名≥18 岁的家庭成员中,有 239 名有 50%的突变携带风险,或者 50%风险的家庭成员已经去世的情况下有 25%的风险,其中 102 人(43%)接受了检测。在有 50%风险且年龄在 25-75 岁的 108 名女性中,有 59 人(55%)进行了预测性或确认性检测,在有 50%风险且有≥18 岁女儿的 43 名男性中,有 22 人(51%)接受了检测。使级联筛查复杂化的因素包括家庭成员居住在国外、先证者不愿分享信息和有限的系谱信息。总之,标准的先证者介导的通知亲属程序似乎远非最佳。我们建议为每个家庭制定个性化的方法,包括遗传学家直接联系有风险的家庭成员的选择。此外,我们建议对家庭进行详细的监测和随访。