Menko Fred H, Ter Stege Jacqueline A, van der Kolk Lizet E, Jeanson Kiki N, Schats Winnie, Moha Daoud Ait, Bleiker Eveline M A
Family Cancer Clinic, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fam Cancer. 2019 Jan;18(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0089-z.
Following the identification in a proband of a germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) or a DNA mismatch repair gene mutation in Lynch syndrome (LS) he or she will be asked to inform at-risk family members about the option for presymptomatic DNA testing. However, in clinical practice multiple factors may complicate the process of information sharing. We critically evaluated studies on the uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in both syndromes. A search of relevant MeSH terms and key words in PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO yielded 795 articles published between 2001 and 2017. Thirty of these publications included outcome measures relevant for the current study. Based on information provided by the proband (15 studies) the uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing ranged from 15 to 57% in HBOC, while one study in LS kindreds reported an uptake of 70%. Based on information provided by genetics centres (the remaining 15 studies) the uptake ranged from 21 to 44% in HBOC and from 41 to 94% in LS. However, when genetics centres contacted relatives directly a substantial number of additional family members could be tested. Proband-mediated provision of information to at-risk relatives is a standard procedure in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome. However, the resulting uptake of presymptomatic testing is disappointing-an issue that is now urgent due to the increased use of genetic testing in clinical oncology. We propose that additional strategies should be introduced including the geneticist directly contacting relatives. The outcomes of these strategies should be carefully monitored and evaluated.
在遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌(HBOC)患者中鉴定出种系BRCA1/BRCA2突变,或在林奇综合征(LS)患者中鉴定出DNA错配修复基因突变后,将要求患者告知高危家庭成员进行症状前DNA检测的选择。然而,在临床实践中,多种因素可能会使信息共享过程变得复杂。我们严格评估了关于这两种综合征症状前基因检测接受情况的研究。在PubMed、Embase和PsycINFO中搜索相关医学主题词和关键词,共检索到2001年至2017年发表的795篇文章。其中30篇出版物包含与本研究相关的结果指标。根据先证者提供的信息(15项研究),HBOC中症状前基因检测的接受率在15%至57%之间,而一项关于LS家系的研究报告接受率为70%。根据遗传中心提供的信息(其余15项研究),HBOC的接受率在21%至44%之间,LS的接受率在41%至94%之间。然而,当遗传中心直接联系亲属时,可以检测到大量额外的家庭成员。先证者向高危亲属提供信息是遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌和林奇综合征的标准程序。然而,症状前检测的实际接受率令人失望——由于临床肿瘤学中基因检测的使用增加,这个问题现在变得紧迫。我们建议应引入其他策略,包括遗传学家直接联系亲属。这些策略的结果应得到仔细监测和评估。