Hale Jo Mhairi, Schneider Daniel C, Mehta Neil K, Myrskylä Mikko
University of St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Mar 31;11:100577. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100577. eCollection 2020 Aug.
Prior studies have analyzed the burden of cognitive impairment, but often use potentially biased prevalence-based methods or measure only years lived with impairment, without estimating other relevant metrics. We use the Health and Retirement Study (1998-2014; n = 29,304) and the preferred incidence-based Markov-chain models to assess three key measures of the burden of cognitive impairment: lifetime risk, mean age at onset, and number of years lived impaired. We analyze both mild and severe cognitive impairment (dementia) and gender, racial/ethnic, and educational variation in impairment. Our results paint a multi-dimensional picture of cognitive health, presenting the first comprehensive analysis of the burden of cognitive impairment for the U.S. population age 50 and older. Approximately two out of three Americans experience some level of cognitive impairment at an average age of approximately 70 years. For dementia, lifetime risk for women (men) is 37% (24%) and mean age at onset 83 (79) years. Women can expect to live 4.2 years with mild impairment and 3.2 with dementia, men 3.5 and 1.8 years. A critical finding is that for the most advantaged groups (i.e., White and/or higher educated), cognitive impairment is both delayed and compressed toward the very end of life. In contrast, despite the shorter lives of disadvantaged subgroups (Black and/or lower educated), they experience a younger age of onset, higher lifetime risk, and more years cognitively impaired. For example, men with at least an Associate degree have 21% lifetime dementia risk, compared to 35% among men with less than high school education. White women have 6 years of cognitively-impaired life expectancy, compared to 12 and 13 years among Black women and Latinas. These educational and racial/ethnic gradients highlight the very uneven burden of cognitive impairment. Further research is required to identify the mechanisms driving these disparities in cognitive impairment.
先前的研究分析了认知障碍的负担,但往往使用可能存在偏差的基于患病率的方法,或者只衡量有障碍的生存年限,而没有估计其他相关指标。我们使用健康与退休研究(1998 - 2014年;n = 29304)以及首选的基于发病率的马尔可夫链模型,来评估认知障碍负担的三个关键指标:终生风险、发病平均年龄以及有障碍的生存年限。我们分析了轻度和重度认知障碍(痴呆症)以及障碍在性别、种族/族裔和教育程度方面的差异。我们的研究结果描绘了一幅认知健康的多维度图景,首次对美国50岁及以上人群的认知障碍负担进行了全面分析。大约三分之二的美国人在平均约70岁时经历某种程度的认知障碍。对于痴呆症,女性(男性)的终生风险为37%(24%),发病平均年龄为83(79)岁。女性预计有轻度障碍的生存年限为4.2年,患痴呆症的生存年限为3.2年,男性分别为3.5年和1.8年。一个关键发现是,对于最具优势的群体(即白人及/或受教育程度较高者),认知障碍既会延迟出现,又会集中在生命即将结束时。相比之下,尽管处境不利的亚群体(黑人及/或受教育程度较低者)寿命较短,但他们发病年龄更小,终生风险更高,认知障碍的年限更多。例如,至少拥有副学士学位的男性患痴呆症的终生风险为21%,而高中以下学历的男性这一风险为35%。白人女性的认知障碍预期寿命为6年,而黑人女性和拉丁裔女性分别为12年和13年。这些教育程度和种族/族裔差异凸显了认知障碍负担的极不均衡性。需要进一步研究以确定导致认知障碍这些差异的机制。