Department of Physics and Astronomy, Center for Biological Physics, California State University, Northridge, Northridge, California 91330, United States.
J Phys Chem B. 2020 May 14;124(19):3962-3972. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c00684. Epub 2020 May 1.
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of the rotational diffusion of small nitroxide probes have been demonstrated to be a powerful technique for experimentally investigating the properties of supercooled liquids, such as water. However, since only the rotational diffusion of the probe molecules is measured and EPR measurements are indirect, it is not clear what the relationship between the behavior of water and the probe molecule is. To address this, we have performed molecular dynamics simulations of four nitroxide probes in TIP4P-Ew and OPC water models to directly compare with EPR experiments and to determine the behavior of the water and the underlying microscopic coupling between the water and the probes. In all, 200 ns simulations were run for 23 temperatures between 253 and 283 K for all four probes with each water model for an aggregate of 36.8 μs of simulation time. Simulations for both water models systematically underestimated the rotational diffusion coefficients for both water and probes, though OPC simulations were generally in better agreement with the experiments than TIP4P-Ew simulations. Despite this, when the temperature dependence of the data was fit to a power law, fit parameters for TIP4P-Ew were generally in better agreement with the experiments than OPC. For probe molecules, the singular temperature was found to be = 226.5 ± 0.4 K from experiments, = 208 ± 2 K for OPC water, and = 215 ± 2 K for TIP4P-Ew water. While for water molecules, the singular temperature was found to be = 220.3 ± 0.2 K from experiments, = 208 ± 2 K for OPC water, and = 220 ± 1 K for TIP4P-Ew water. Systematic underestimation of the rotational diffusion coefficients was most pronounced at lower temperatures and was clearly observed in changes to the Arrhenius activation energy. Above the maximum density temperature of = 277 K, an activation energy of ≈ 16.7 kJ/mol was observed for the probes from experiments, while OPC had ≈ 15.2 kJ/mol and TIP4P-Ew had ≈ 14.6 kJ/mol. Below the maximum density temperature, the activation energy jumped to ≈ 32.5 kJ/mol for experiments but only ≈ 23 kJ/mol for OPC and ≈ 22 kJ/mol for TIP4P-Ew. In all cases, we saw good agreement between the behavior of the probe molecules and water. To understand why, we calculated the average number of hydrogen bonds between the probe molecules and water. From this, we were able to explain the rotational diffusion times for all of the probes. These results show that current molecular models are sufficient to capture physical phenomena observed with EPR and to help elucidate why the probes provide accurate insights into the behavior of supercooled water.
电子顺磁共振(EPR)测量小的氮氧自由基探针的旋转扩散已被证明是一种强大的技术,可用于实验研究过冷液体的性质,例如水。然而,由于仅测量探针分子的旋转扩散,并且 EPR 测量是间接的,因此不清楚水的行为与探针分子之间的关系是什么。为了解决这个问题,我们对 TIP4P-Ew 和 OPC 水模型中的四个氮氧自由基探针进行了分子动力学模拟,以直接与 EPR 实验进行比较,并确定水和探针的行为以及水与探针之间的潜在微观耦合。总共对四个探针在所有四个探针的 23 个温度下进行了 200 ns 的模拟,每个水模型的模拟时间总计为 36.8 μs。对于两种水模型,模拟均系统地低估了水和探针的旋转扩散系数,尽管 OPC 模拟通常比 TIP4P-Ew 模拟更符合实验。尽管如此,当数据的温度依赖性拟合为幂律时,TIP4P-Ew 的拟合参数通常比 OPC 更符合实验。对于探针分子,奇异温度实验中为 = 226.5 ± 0.4 K,OPC 水为 = 208 ± 2 K,TIP4P-Ew 水为 = 215 ± 2 K。而对于水分子,奇异温度实验中为 = 220.3 ± 0.2 K,OPC 水为 = 208 ± 2 K,TIP4P-Ew 水为 = 220 ± 1 K。在较低的温度下,旋转扩散系数的系统低估最为明显,并且在 Arrhenius 活化能的变化中明显观察到。在最大密度温度 = 277 K 以上,实验中观察到探针的活化能约为 16.7 kJ/mol,而 OPC 为 ≈ 15.2 kJ/mol,TIP4P-Ew 为 ≈ 14.6 kJ/mol。在最大密度温度以下,活化能跃升至实验中的 ≈ 32.5 kJ/mol,但 OPC 仅为 ≈ 23 kJ/mol,TIP4P-Ew 仅为 ≈ 22 kJ/mol。在所有情况下,我们都看到探针分子和水的行为之间存在很好的一致性。为了了解原因,我们计算了探针分子与水之间氢键的平均数量。由此,我们能够解释所有探针的旋转扩散时间。这些结果表明,当前的分子模型足以捕捉到 EPR 观察到的物理现象,并有助于阐明为什么探针能提供对过冷水行为的准确见解。