Suppr超能文献

经腋窝入路免充气三孔法全腔镜甲状腺切除术

Real Scarless Transoral Robotic Thyroidectomy Using Three Ports Without Axillary Incision.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University, School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Nov;30(11):1165-1171. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0102. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

Abstract

Conventional transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) requires an axillary incision and additional flap dissection. This study aimed to outline the first ever experiences with TORT using three ports without axillary incision and compare the results between three-port and four-port TORT. A total of 100 consecutive patients were enrolled. The study sample comprised 47 patients who underwent four-port TORT from November 2016 to June 2017, and 53 patients who underwent three-port TORT from September 2018 to June 2019. The indication of the three-port TORT was the anterior/posterior length of the thyroid <1.8 cm and mass size <1.5 cm. Operative time (minutes) was shorter in the three-port group (166.3 ± 35.4 versus 138.5 ± 34.4,  = .005). Hospital stay (days) was also shorter in the three-port group (3.8 ± 0.4 versus 2.4 ± 0.6,  = .003). TORT using three ports yielded a higher cosmetic satisfaction (3.68 ± 0.52 versus 3.89 ± 0.30,  = .002). Postoperative complications, level of calcium, parathyroid hormone, and pain were not significantly different between the groups. Our study showed that three-port TORT was associated with a shorter operative time, hospital stay, and excellent cosmesis than the conventional four-port option. In conclusion, TORT using three ports is a comparable and an effective operation method as a real scarless operation.

摘要

传统经口机器人甲状腺切除术(TORT)需要腋窝切口和额外的皮瓣游离。本研究旨在概述首次使用无腋窝切口的三孔 TORT,并比较三孔和四孔 TORT 的结果。共有 100 例连续患者入组。研究样本包括 47 例行四孔 TORT 的患者(2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 6 月)和 53 例行三孔 TORT 的患者(2018 年 9 月至 2019 年 6 月)。三孔 TORT 的适应证为甲状腺前后径<1.8cm,肿块大小<1.5cm。三孔组的手术时间(分钟)更短(166.3±35.4 比 138.5±34.4,=0.005)。三孔组的住院时间(天)也更短(3.8±0.4 比 2.4±0.6,=0.003)。三孔组的美容满意度更高(3.68±0.52 比 3.89±0.30,=0.002)。术后并发症、血钙、甲状旁腺激素和疼痛水平在两组间无显著差异。本研究表明,与传统的四孔方法相比,三孔 TORT 具有手术时间短、住院时间短、美容效果好的优点。总之,三孔 TORT 是一种与真正的无痕手术相当且有效的手术方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验