From the Ottawa, Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Galmiche, Dobransky, Kim, Feibel, Gofton, Abdelbary, Beaulé); and the School of Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Poitras).
Can J Surg. 2020 Apr 17;63(22):E181-E189. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008919.
The most effective surgical approach to total hip replacement (THR) remains controversial. Most studies that have compared approaches have reported only short-term outcome data. It is therefore unclear in the literature if a particular surgical approach offers long-term advantages. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the 3 main surgical approaches to THR on patient-reported outcomes 5 years after surgery.
All patients who underwent a THR for osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis between 2008 and 2012 by an anterior, posterior or lateral approach at The Ottawa Hospital in Ontario, Canada, were included in the study. All preoperative and postoperative scores for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaires were recorded. Analysis of covariance was used to study the relationship between the amount of change in scores on the HOOS and WOMAC subscales (dependent variables) and the surgical approach. The confounding factors of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, Charnley classification and body mass index were included in the analysis.
There were 138 patients (37.6%) in the posterior approach group, 104 (28.3%) in the lateral approach group and 125 (34.1%) in the anterior approach group. There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in terms of Charnley classification, body mass index, sex, ASA class, surgical side and preoperative functional scores. We did not observe any significant differences in the amount of change in the scores for HOOS and WOMAC subscales among the 3 groups. There were also no differences in the final postoperative scores.
Our findings suggest that the choice of surgical approach in primary THR surgery without revision has no influence on functional outcomes and quality of life after 5 years. Further studies are needed to assess how patient age and sex may influence the functional outcome of individual surgical approaches.
全髋关节置换术(THR)最有效的手术入路仍存在争议。大多数比较入路的研究仅报告了短期结果数据。因此,文献中尚不清楚特定的手术入路是否具有长期优势。本研究旨在确定 THR 的 3 种主要手术入路在手术后 5 年对患者报告的结果的影响。
所有于 2008 年至 2012 年在加拿大安大略省渥太华医院接受前侧、后侧或外侧入路 THR 的骨关节炎或股骨头坏死患者均纳入研究。记录所有术前和术后髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结果评分(HOOS)和西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)问卷的评分。使用协方差分析研究 HOOS 和 WOMAC 子量表评分变化量(因变量)与手术入路之间的关系。分析中包括年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、Charnley 分级和体重指数等混杂因素。
后侧入路组 138 例(37.6%),外侧入路组 104 例(28.3%),前侧入路组 125 例(34.1%)。3 组之间在 Charnley 分级、体重指数、性别、ASA 分级、手术侧和术前功能评分方面均无显著差异。我们未观察到 3 组 HOOS 和 WOMAC 子量表评分变化量有任何显著差异。最终术后评分也无差异。
我们的研究结果表明,初次 THR 手术中不翻修的手术入路选择对术后 5 年的功能结果和生活质量没有影响。需要进一步研究评估患者年龄和性别如何影响特定手术入路的功能结果。