• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

稳定型缺血性疾病影像学检查的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness for imaging stable ischemic disease.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2020 Sep 1;93(1113):20190764. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190764. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1259/bjr.20190764
PMID:32302209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7465859/
Abstract

Stable ischemic heart disease remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although there are multiple imaging modalities to diagnose and/or assist in the clinical management, the most cost-effective approach remains unclear. We reviewed the relevant and recent evidence-based clinical studies and trials to suggest the most cost-effective approach to stable ischemic heart disease. The limitations of these studies are discussed. Incorporating the results of recent multicenter trials, we suggest that for appropriate patients with coronary artery disease with any degree of stenosis or presence of coronary calcium, optimal medical therapy may be most cost-effective. Invasive coronary angiography and/or coronary revascularization would be primarily for non-responders or >/=50% left main stenosis. Stress cardiac magnetic imaging would be performed for those patients with non-diagnostic coronary CT angiography from motion and non-responders from optimal medical therapy in non-diagnostic coronary CT angiography group from high coronary calcium. These paths seem to be safe and cost-effective but requires modeling for confirmation.

摘要

稳定型缺血性心脏病仍然是发病率和死亡率的主要原因。尽管有多种成像方式可用于诊断和/或协助临床管理,但最具成本效益的方法仍不清楚。我们回顾了相关的、最近的基于证据的临床研究和试验,以提出稳定型缺血性心脏病最具成本效益的方法。讨论了这些研究的局限性。结合最近多中心试验的结果,我们建议对于任何程度狭窄或存在冠状动脉钙的适当的冠状动脉疾病患者,最佳的药物治疗可能是最具成本效益的。对于非反应者或> / = 50%左主干狭窄的患者,将进行有创冠状动脉造影和/或冠状动脉血运重建。对于那些在非诊断性冠状动脉 CT 血管造影检查中因运动而出现不明确结果的患者,以及在非诊断性冠状动脉 CT 血管造影检查中对最佳药物治疗无反应的患者,将进行心脏磁共振成像检查,这些患者的冠状动脉钙含量较高。这些方法似乎是安全且具有成本效益的,但需要建立模型进行确认。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness for imaging stable ischemic disease.稳定型缺血性疾病影像学检查的成本效益。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Sep 1;93(1113):20190764. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190764. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
2
The STRATEGY Study (Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for the Management of Symptomatic Revascularized Patients): Resources and Outcomes Impact.STRATEGY研究(应激心脏磁共振成像与计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影术在有症状的血运重建患者管理中的应用比较):资源与结局影响
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Oct;9(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005171.
3
Cost-effectiveness of functional cardiac testing in the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease: a randomised controlled trial. The CECaT trial.功能性心脏检查在冠状动脉疾病诊断和管理中的成本效益:一项随机对照试验。CECaT试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Dec;11(49):iii-iv, ix-115. doi: 10.3310/hta11490.
4
Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial.基于冠状动脉 CT 血管造影的无创血流储备分数:PROMISE 试验的处理和结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov;10(11):1350-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.024. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
5
International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial: Rationale and design.国际比较医疗与介入治疗缺血效果研究(ISCHEMIA)试验:原理与设计。
Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:124-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
6
CT myocardial perfusion and coronary CT angiography: Influence of coronary calcium on a stress-rest protocol.CT心肌灌注与冠状动脉CT血管造影:冠状动脉钙化对负荷-静息方案的影响。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun;10(3):215-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
7
Cardiac-CT and cardiac-MR cost-effectiveness: a literature review.心脏 CT 和心脏磁共振的成本效益:文献综述。
Radiol Med. 2020 Nov;125(11):1200-1207. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01290-z. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
8
Comprehensive Cardiac CT With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Functional Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The Multicenter, Randomized CRESCENT-II Trial.疑似冠心病患者的综合心脏 CT 与心肌灌注成像检查与功能检测的对比:多中心、随机的 CRESCENT-II 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;11(11):1625-1636. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
9
Coronary computed tomography angiography vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in patients with intermediate risk chest pain: a randomized clinical trial for cost-effectiveness comparison based on real-world cost.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影与心肌单光子发射计算机断层扫描在中危胸痛患者中的比较:基于真实世界成本的成本效益随机临床试验。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):417-425. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey099.
10
Prediction of Coronary Revascularization in Stable Angina: Comparison of FFR With CMR Stress Perfusion Imaging.稳定型心绞痛患者冠状动脉血运重建的预测:FFR 与 CMR 负荷灌注成像的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr;13(4):994-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.028. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of Literature Citing the ISCHEMIA Trial.系统综述引用 ISCHEMIA 试验的文献。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 May;26(5):325-329. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02031-8. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
2
Cost Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography in Cardiology: A Case Study of a University Hospital Complex in the Euro Region.心脏病学中磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描的成本分析:以欧元区一家大学医院联合体为例
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;11(14):2084. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142084.
3
Worldwide Disparities in Recovery of Cardiac Testing 1 Year Into COVID-19.全球 COVID-19 大流行 1 年后,心脏检测结果的恢复情况存在差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 24;79(20):2001-2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.348.
4
Ten things to know about ten imaging studies: A preventive cardiology perspective ("ASPC top ten imaging").关于十项影像学研究需了解的十件事:预防心脏病学视角(“美国预防心脏病学会十大影像学”)
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Mar 27;6:100176. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100176. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Imaging patients with stable chest pain special feature: introductory editorial.胸痛症状稳定患者的影像学检查 专题报道:引言社论
Br J Radiol. 2020 Sep 1;93(1113):20209005. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20209005.

本文引用的文献

1
Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease.稳定型冠心病的初始侵入性或保守治疗策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1395-1407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
2
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.2019年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征诊断和管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
3
2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk.2019年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会血脂异常管理指南:通过血脂修饰降低心血管风险
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study.单独或联合使用无创影像学检查诊断稳定型冠状动脉疾病的成本效益分析:EVINCI 研究结果。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Dec;20(9):1437-1449. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
5
Magnetic Resonance Perfusion or Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Disease.磁共振灌注或冠状动脉疾病的血流储备分数。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2418-2428. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716734.
6
2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2019美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管疾病一级预防指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2019 Sep 10;140(11):e596-e646. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
7
Overview of Cost-effectiveness Analysis.成本效益分析概述。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 9;321(14):1400-1401. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1265.
8
Imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade.对心肌缺血级联反应进行成像。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Aug;34(8):1249-1263. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1330-4. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
9
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
10
Comparative cost-effectiveness of non-invasive imaging tests in patients presenting with chronic stable chest pain with suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review.疑似冠心病慢性稳定型胸痛患者中无创影像学检查的成本效益比较:系统评价。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2016 Oct 1;2(4):245-260. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw029.