• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项确保吸入器设备正确使用的远程医疗干预措施。

A Telemedicine Intervention to Ensure the Correct Usage of Inhaler Devices.

作者信息

Trosini-Désert Valery, Lafoeste Hélène, Regard Lucile, Malrin Roxane, Galarza-Jimenez Maria-Alejandra, Amarilla Cristina Esteban, Delrieu Jacqueline, Fôret Didier, Melloni Boris, El-Khouari Fadwa, Similowski Thomas

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Intensive Care Medicine, Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.

ANTADIR Federation, Maison du Poumon, Paris, France.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2020 Nov;26(11):1336-1344. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0246. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1089/tmj.2019.0246
PMID:32302518
Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma patients' use of inhalers is error prone. This study evaluated telemedicine to improve the use of inhalers. Prospective, single-center pilot study in 50 patients with long-term prescription of inhaled medicine and ongoing home health care visits. In an initial telemedicine intervention, tablet devices were used by the patient to record inhaler use at home in the real-time remote presence of a physician. Errors were identified, explained to the patient, and corrected remotely. When necessary, further telemedicine interventions were scheduled at 24-48 h intervals. Follow-up interventions were performed during routine outpatient visits. Patient satisfaction was evaluated on a scale of 0 (completely unsatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied). An initial telemedicine intervention was conducted for 42 of the 50 patients included. In these patients, 96 initial inhaler medicine administration telemedicine interventions were performed, of which 94 were usable. In the initial interventions, 71 errors were identified, of which 22 (31%) were considered critical. In 81 follow-up interventions in 39 patients (median delay 256 days), 32 errors were identified ( < 0.001 vs. initial 71 errors), of which 7 were critical ( = 0.0017 vs. initial 22 errors). This paves the way for future studies testing putative benefits of telemedicine regarding inhaled drug delivery, treatment adherence, disease control, quality of life, and health care burden and costs. A telemedicine intervention aimed at improving the administration of inhaled medication by adult patients at home is feasible, highly appreciated by patients, and effective at correcting medicine administration errors.

摘要

慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘患者使用吸入器时容易出错。本研究评估了远程医疗对改善吸入器使用情况的作用。对50名长期使用吸入药物且正在接受家庭医疗访视的患者进行了前瞻性单中心试点研究。在最初的远程医疗干预中,患者使用平板电脑设备在医生实时远程在场的情况下记录在家中使用吸入器的情况。识别出错误后,向患者解释并进行远程纠正。必要时,每隔24 - 48小时安排进一步的远程医疗干预。在常规门诊就诊期间进行随访干预。患者满意度采用0(完全不满意)至10(完全满意)的评分标准进行评估。纳入研究的50名患者中有42名接受了最初的远程医疗干预。在这些患者中,共进行了96次初始吸入药物给药远程医疗干预,其中94次可用。在初始干预中,识别出71个错误,其中22个(31%)被认为是严重错误。在39名患者的81次随访干预中(中位延迟256天),识别出32个错误(与初始的71个错误相比,<0.001),其中7个是严重错误(与初始的22个错误相比,=0.0017)。这为未来测试远程医疗在吸入药物递送、治疗依从性、疾病控制、生活质量以及医疗负担和成本方面的假定益处的研究铺平了道路。旨在改善成年患者在家中吸入药物给药情况的远程医疗干预是可行的,深受患者赞赏,并且在纠正给药错误方面有效。

相似文献

1
A Telemedicine Intervention to Ensure the Correct Usage of Inhaler Devices.一项确保吸入器设备正确使用的远程医疗干预措施。
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Nov;26(11):1336-1344. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0246. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
2
Inhaler Training Delivered by Internet-Based Home Videoconferencing Improves Technique and Quality of Life.通过基于互联网的家庭视频会议进行吸入器训练可改善技术和生活质量。
Respir Care. 2017 Nov;62(11):1412-1422. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05445. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
3
Effectiveness of Virtual vs In-Person Inhaler Education for Hospitalized Patients With Obstructive Lung Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.虚拟与面对面吸入器教育对住院阻塞性肺病患者的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918205. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18205.
4
Device errors in asthma and COPD: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.哮喘和 COPD 中的器械错误:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Apr 3;27(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0016-z.
5
Inhalatory therapy training: a priority challenge for the physician.吸入疗法培训:医师面临的一项首要挑战。
Acta Biomed. 2007 Dec;78(3):233-45.
6
A randomised open-label cross-over study of inhaler errors, preference and time to achieve correct inhaler use in patients with COPD or asthma: comparison of ELLIPTA with other inhaler devices.一项比较 Ellipta 与其他吸入器设备的在 COPD 或哮喘患者中发生的吸入器错误、偏好以及达到正确使用吸入器时间的随机、开放标签、交叉研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Nov 24;26:16079. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.79.
7
A quantitative evaluation of adherence and inhalation technique among respiratory patients: An observational study using an electronic inhaler assessment device.一种电子吸入评估设备在呼吸病患者中的使用:一项关于依从性和吸入技术的定量评估的观察性研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;74(2):e13437. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13437. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Administration Technique and Acceptance of Inhaler Devices in Patients With Asthma or COPD.哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入装置的给药技术与接受度
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;49(6):639-48. doi: 10.1177/1060028015579097. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
9
Maintenance inhaler preference, attribute importance, and satisfaction in prescribing physicians and patients with asthma, COPD, or asthma-COPD overlap syndrome consulting for routine care.维持性吸入器偏好、属性重要性以及哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或哮喘-COPD重叠综合征患者及开具处方的医生在接受常规护理咨询时的满意度。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Mar 16;13:927-936. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S154525. eCollection 2018.
10
COPD: misuse of inhaler devices in clinical practice.COPD:临床实践中吸入器装置的误用。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 May 30;14:1209-1217. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S178040. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital health technologies for improving the management of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者管理的数字健康技术。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 6;7:1640585. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1640585. eCollection 2025.
2
Current Implementation of Digital Health in Chronic Disease Management: Scoping Review.慢性病管理中数字健康的当前实施情况:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 12;26:e53576. doi: 10.2196/53576.
3
Enrollment and dropout rates of individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease approached for telehealth interventions: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis.
针对远程医疗干预措施的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的纳入率和退出率:一项系统评价和Meta回归分析。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 22;10(1):e23776. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23776. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
4
The use of remote video directly observed therapy to improve both inhaler technique and adherence to asthma medications.使用远程视频直接观察治疗以改善吸入器技术和哮喘药物的依从性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;10:965629. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.965629. eCollection 2022.
5
Patient and Clinician Attitudes Toward Telemedicine for Allergy and Immunology.患者和临床医生对过敏与免疫学远程医疗的态度。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Oct;10(10):2493-2499. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
[Teleconsultation in the follow-up of the asthma patient. Lessons after COVID-19].[哮喘患者随访中的远程会诊。新冠疫情后的经验教训]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2021 Jan;57:13-14. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
7
Virtual mask fitting in pediatric patients during COVID-19: A case series.新冠疫情期间儿科患者的虚拟面罩适配:病例系列
Can J Respir Ther. 2021 Jul 23;57:93-98. doi: 10.29390/cjrt-2021-023. eCollection 2021.
8
Blood Eosinophil Counts and Their Variability and Risk of Exacerbations in COPD: A Population-Based Study.基于人群的研究:血嗜酸性粒细胞计数及其变异性与 COPD 加重的风险。
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2021 Jan;57(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2019.12.015. Epub 2020 Feb 13.