• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用遥感方法研究印度森林火灾对陆地碳排放量和生态系统生产力的影响。

Examining the effects of forest fire on terrestrial carbon emission and ecosystem production in India using remote sensing approaches.

机构信息

School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, Richview, Clonskeagh, Dublin, D14 E099, Ireland.

School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, Richview, Clonskeagh, Dublin, D14 E099, Ireland.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 10;725:138331. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138331. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138331
PMID:32302833
Abstract

Remote sensing techniques are effectively used for measuring the overall loss of terrestrial ecosystem productivity and biodiversity due to forest fires. The current research focuses on assessing the impacts of forest fires on terrestrial ecosystem productivity in India during 2003-2017. Spatiotemporal changes of satellite remote sensing derived burn indices were estimated for both fire and normal years to analyze the association between forest fires and ecosystem productivity. Two Light Use Efficiency (LUE) models were used to quantify the terrestrial Net Primary Productivity (NPP) of the forest ecosystem using the open-source and freely available remotely sensed data. A novel approach (delta NPP/delta burn indices) is developed to quantify the effects of forest fires on terrestrial carbon emission and ecosystem production. During 2003-2017, the forest fire intensity was found to be very high (>2000) across the eastern Himalayan hilly region, which is mostly covered by dense forest and thereby highly susceptible to wildfires. Scattered patches of intense forest fires were also detected in the lower Himalayan and central Indian states. The spatial correlation between the burn indices and NPP were mainly negative (-0.01 to -0.89) for the fire-prone states as compared to the other neighbouring regions. Additionally, the linear approximation between the burn indices and NPP showed a positive relation (0.01 to 0.63), suggesting a moderate to high impact of the forest fires on the ecosystem production and terrestrial carbon emission. The present approach has the potential to quantify the loss of ecosystem productivity due to forest fires.

摘要

遥感技术有效地用于测量由于森林火灾导致的陆地生态系统生产力和生物多样性的整体损失。目前的研究集中于评估 2003-2017 年期间森林火灾对印度陆地生态系统生产力的影响。为了分析森林火灾与生态系统生产力之间的关系,对火年和非火年的卫星遥感衍生烧伤指数的时空变化进行了估计。使用开源和免费的遥感数据,采用两种光能利用率(LUE)模型来量化森林生态系统的陆地净初级生产力(NPP)。提出了一种新方法(δNPP/δ烧伤指数),用于量化森林火灾对陆地碳排放和生态系统生产的影响。在 2003-2017 年期间,发现东喜马拉雅丘陵地区的森林火灾强度非常高(>2000),该地区主要覆盖着茂密的森林,因此极易发生野火。在较低的喜马拉雅山脉和印度中部各州也检测到了零星的高强度森林火灾。与其他相邻地区相比,易发生火灾的州的烧伤指数与 NPP 之间的空间相关性主要为负(-0.01 到-0.89)。此外,烧伤指数与 NPP 之间的线性近似关系呈正相关(0.01 到 0.63),这表明森林火灾对生态系统生产和陆地碳排放有中度到高度的影响。该方法有可能量化森林火灾导致的生态系统生产力损失。

相似文献

1
Examining the effects of forest fire on terrestrial carbon emission and ecosystem production in India using remote sensing approaches.利用遥感方法研究印度森林火灾对陆地碳排放量和生态系统生产力的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 10;725:138331. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138331. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
2
Detection, emission estimation and risk prediction of forest fires in China using satellite sensors and simulation models in the past three decades--an overview.利用卫星传感器和模拟模型在过去三十年中对中国森林火灾的检测、排放估算和风险预测——综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Aug;8(8):3156-78. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8083156. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
3
Burn me twice, shame on who? Interactions between successive forest fires across a temperate mountain region.两度被烧伤,羞煞谁?温带山区连续森林火灾间的相互作用。
Ecology. 2016 Sep;97(9):2272-2282. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1439.
4
Regional estimation of current and future forest biomass.当前及未来森林生物量的区域估算。
Environ Pollut. 2002;116 Suppl 1:S7-16. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00241-x.
5
[Impact of fire on carbon dynamics of Larix gmelinii forest in Daxing'an Mountains of North-East China: a simulation with CENTURY model].[火灾对中国东北大兴安岭地区兴安落叶松林碳动态的影响:基于CENTURY模型的模拟]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2012 Sep;23(9):2411-21.
6
[Simulating the post-fire net primary production restoration and its affecting factors by using MTCLIM and 3PGS model in Genhe forest region, Northeast China].[基于MTCLIM和3PGS模型模拟中国东北根河林区火烧后净初级生产力恢复及其影响因素]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Nov;29(11):3712-3722. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201811.012.
7
Investigation of fire regime dynamics and modeling of burn area over India for the twenty-first century.二十一世纪印度火灾状况动态研究及火烧面积模型建立。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Sep;31(41):53839-53855. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32922-w. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
8
Estimation and analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity over India by remote-sensing-driven terrestrial biosphere model.利用遥感驱动的陆地生物圈模型估算和分析印度的陆地净初级生产力。
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 Nov;170(1-4):195-213. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1226-9. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
9
Fire transforms effects of terrestrial subsidies on aquatic ecosystem structure and function.火改变了陆地补贴对水生生态系统结构和功能的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jan;30(1):e17058. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17058.
10
[Measurement model of carbon emission from forest fire: a review].[森林火灾碳排放测量模型:综述]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2012 May;23(5):1423-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Net Primary Productivity of Vegetation on Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountains Based on CASA Model, China.基于CASA模型的中国天山北坡植被净初级生产力时空变化特征及驱动机制
Plants (Basel). 2025 Aug 12;14(16):2499. doi: 10.3390/plants14162499.
2
Understanding fire regimes: A biogeographical perspective.理解火灾状况:生物地理学视角
Jamba. 2024 Jul 26;16(1):1673. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1673. eCollection 2024.
3
The Relationship between the Transmission of Different SARS-CoV-2 Strains and Air Quality: A Case Study in China.
不同 SARS-CoV-2 株系传播与空气质量的关系:中国的一项案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1943. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031943.