Elharram Malik, Moura Cristiano S, Abrahamowicz Michal, Bernatsky Sasha, Behlouli Hassan, Raparelli Valeria, Pilote Louise
Department of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Qc, Canada; Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;310:147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.03.025. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
Recent randomized control trials have described a protective cardiovascular effect of novel glucose lowering drugs in patients at high cardiovascular risk. Whether these second-line agents have similar effects in the general population is unknown. We aimed to compare the risk of major cardiovascular and adverse events in new users of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist (GLP-1a), and sulfonylurea in T2DM patients not controlled on metformin therapy.
Retrospective cohort study using the MarketScan database (2011-2015). We selected T2DM individuals who were newly dispensed sulfonylureas, SGLT-2i, DPP-4i, or GLP-1a, as second-line therapy, added to metformin. Cohort entry was defined by date of first prescription of the second-line agent. Time to first non-fatal cardiovascular or adverse event was compared using Cox regression models adjusted for confounders.
Among 118,341 T2DM patients using metformin (mean age: 56), most were at low cardiovascular risk (4% with previous cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event). During a median follow-up of 10 months compared with sulfonylureas users, cardiovascular risk was lower in users of SGLT-2i (aHR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.40-0.97), DPP-4i (aHR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.90) and GLP-1a (aHR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.48-0.89). Serious adverse events were rare but compared with sulfonylurea, the risk was lower in new users of novel glucose lowering agents.
In our analyses, which included patients with and without prior cardiovascular disease, initiating novel glucose lowering drugs as second-line therapy for T2DM was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular and adverse events than sulfonylurea initiation.
近期的随机对照试验描述了新型降糖药物对心血管高危患者的心血管保护作用。这些二线药物在普通人群中是否有类似作用尚不清楚。我们旨在比较2型糖尿病患者在二甲双胍治疗效果不佳时,新使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT-2i)、二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP-4i)、胰高血糖素样肽1激动剂(GLP-1a)和磺脲类药物时发生主要心血管及不良事件的风险。
使用MarketScan数据库(2011 - 2015年)进行回顾性队列研究。我们选择了新使用磺脲类药物、SGLT-2i、DPP-4i或GLP-1a作为二线治疗并加用二甲双胍的2型糖尿病患者。队列进入由二线药物的首次处方日期定义。使用调整了混杂因素的Cox回归模型比较首次发生非致命性心血管或不良事件的时间。
在118341名使用二甲双胍的2型糖尿病患者(平均年龄:56岁)中,大多数心血管风险较低(4%有既往心血管或脑血管事件)。在中位随访10个月期间,与使用磺脲类药物的患者相比,使用SGLT-2i(风险比[aHR]=0.61;95%置信区间[CI]:0.40 - 0.97)、DPP-4i(aHR = 0.79;95% CI:0.69 - 0.90)和GLP-1a(aHR = 0.65;95% CI:0.48 - 0.89)的患者心血管风险较低。严重不良事件很少见,但与磺脲类药物相比,新型降糖药物新使用者的风险较低。
在我们的分析中,包括有和没有既往心血管疾病的患者,2型糖尿病患者开始使用新型降糖药物作为二线治疗与使用磺脲类药物相比,心血管和不良事件风险较低。