• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普及儿童健康促进计划的公平性影响。

The equity impact of a universal child health promotion programme.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Department of Statistics, Umeå School of Business and Economics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Jun;74(7):605-611. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213503. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2019-213503
PMID:32303594
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7337232/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Real-world evaluations of complex interventions are scarce. We evaluated the effect of the Salut Programme, a universal child health promotion intervention in northern Sweden, on income-related inequalities in positive birth outcomes and healthcare utilisation up to 2 years after delivery.

METHODS

Using the mother's place of residence at delivery, the child and the mother were classified as belonging to either the control area (received care-as-usual) or the intervention area (where the intervention was implemented from 2006) and either the premeasure (children born between 2002 and 2004) or the postmeasure (children born between 2006 and 2008) period. Parents' earned income was used as the socioeconomic ranking variable. The Relative Concentration Index was computed for six binary birth outcome indicators and for inpatient and day patient care for children and their mothers. Changes in inequality over time were compared using a difference-in-difference approach.

RESULTS

Income-related inequalities in birth outcomes and child healthcare utilisation were absent, except that full-term pregnancies were concentrated among the poor at premeasure in the intervention area. In contrast, mothers' healthcare utilisation was significantly pro-poor in the control area. The extent of inequality changed differentially between premeasure and postmeasure for two birth outcomes: full-term pregnancies and infants with normal birth weight. Inequalities in healthcare utilisation did not change significantly in either area over time.

CONCLUSION

In northern Sweden, income-related inequalities in birth outcomes and child healthcare utilisation are largely absent. However, relative inequalities in mothers' healthcare utilisation are large. We found no evidence that the Salut Programme affected changes in inequality over time.

摘要

背景

针对复杂干预措施的真实世界评估较为匮乏。我们评估了 Salut 计划的效果,该计划是在瑞典北部实施的一项普遍的儿童健康促进干预措施,其对与收入相关的积极分娩结果和产后 2 年内医疗保健利用的不平等影响。

方法

根据分娩时母亲的居住地、儿童和母亲的情况,将其分为对照组(接受常规护理)和干预组(2006 年开始实施干预),并分为前测期(2002 年至 2004 年之间出生的儿童)和后测期(2006 年至 2008 年之间出生的儿童)。父母的收入被用作社会经济排名变量。计算了六个二元分娩结果指标和儿童及其母亲的住院和日间病人护理的相对集中指数。使用差异中的差异方法比较了随时间变化的不平等变化。

结果

除了在干预区的前测期,足月妊娠集中在贫困人群中外,与收入相关的分娩结果和儿童医疗保健利用的不平等现象并不存在。相比之下,在对照组中,母亲的医疗保健利用明显偏向贫困人群。在两个分娩结果(足月妊娠和正常出生体重的婴儿)中,不平等程度在预测量和后测量之间存在差异变化:在对照组中,不平等程度随着时间的推移而显著增加。医疗保健利用的不平等在两个地区均无明显变化。

结论

在瑞典北部,与收入相关的分娩结果和儿童医疗保健利用的不平等现象基本不存在。然而,母亲医疗保健利用的相对不平等程度很大。我们没有发现 Salut 计划对随时间变化的不平等产生影响的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7b/7337232/c219feb27e71/jech-2019-213503f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7b/7337232/2fca81e82d83/jech-2019-213503f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7b/7337232/3f54ce76cb64/jech-2019-213503f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7b/7337232/0f6e31e9c78e/jech-2019-213503f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7b/7337232/c219feb27e71/jech-2019-213503f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7b/7337232/2fca81e82d83/jech-2019-213503f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7b/7337232/3f54ce76cb64/jech-2019-213503f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7b/7337232/0f6e31e9c78e/jech-2019-213503f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7b/7337232/c219feb27e71/jech-2019-213503f04.jpg

相似文献

1
The equity impact of a universal child health promotion programme.普及儿童健康促进计划的公平性影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Jun;74(7):605-611. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213503. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
2
Is the Salut Programme an effective and cost-effective universal health promotion intervention for parents and their children? A register-based retrospective observational study.“健康问候计划”对父母及其子女而言,是一项有效且具成本效益的全民健康促进干预措施吗?一项基于登记的回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 21;7(9):e016732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016732.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Salut Programme: a universal health promotion intervention for parents and children-protocol of a register-based retrospective observational study.萨卢特计划的有效性和成本效益:一项针对父母和儿童的全民健康促进干预措施——基于登记册的回顾性观察性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 4;6(8):e011202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011202.
4
Equitable health services for the young? A decomposition of income-related inequalities in young adults' utilization of health care in Northern Sweden.为年轻人提供公平的医疗服务?瑞典北部年轻人医疗保健利用方面与收入相关的不平等分解
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 18;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0520-3.
5
Health and economic outcomes of a universal early intervention for parents and children from birth to age five: evaluation of the Salut Programme using a natural experiment.针对从出生到五岁的父母和儿童的全民早期干预的健康和经济成果:利用自然实验对Salut计划进行评估。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 May 4;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00439-7.
6
Urban-rural disparity of preventive healthcare utilisation among children under the universal health insurance coverage in Taiwan: a national birth cohort analysis.台湾全民健保下儿童预防保健利用之城乡差距:全国出生队列分析。
Public Health. 2020 May;182:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
7
Measurement and analysis of inequality of opportunity in access of maternal and child health care in Togo.多哥孕产妇和儿童保健服务获取机会不平等的测量与分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 4;17(Suppl 2):699. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2647-8.
8
Increasing inequalities in health care utilisation across income groups in Sweden during the 1990s?20世纪90年代瑞典不同收入群体在医疗保健利用方面的不平等现象是否在加剧?
Health Policy. 2002 Nov;62(2):117-29. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00016-7.
9
The evolution of income-related inequalities in healthcare utilisation in Indonesia, 1993-2014.印尼医疗卫生服务利用的收入相关不平等演变:1993-2014 年
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 25;14(6):e0218519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218519. eCollection 2019.
10
Inequalities in health and health service utilisation among reproductive age women in St. Petersburg, Russia: a cross-sectional study.俄罗斯圣彼得堡生殖年龄段女性健康和卫生服务利用方面的不平等:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Nov 11;10:307. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-307.

引用本文的文献

1
Do studies evaluating early-life policy interventions fully adhere to the critical conditions of difference-in-differences? A systematic review.评估早期生活政策干预的研究是否完全符合双重差分法的关键条件?一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 16;14(5):e083927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083927.
2
Social inequalities in social-emotional problems among preschool children: a population-based study in Sweden.社会不平等对学龄前儿童社会情感问题的影响:瑞典的一项基于人群的研究。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2147294. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2147294.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of New Labour's English health inequalities strategy on geographical inequalities in infant mortality: a time-trend analysis.新工党英语卫生不平等战略对婴儿死亡率的地理不平等的影响:时间趋势分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jun;73(6):564-568. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211679. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
2
Multiple inequity in health care: An example from Brazil.医疗保健中的多重不平等:来自巴西的一个例子。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 May;228:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.034. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
3
The next step towards more equity in health in Sweden: how can we close the gap in a generation?
迈向更公平瑞典健康的下一步:我们如何在一代人的时间内缩小差距?
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jun;46(22_suppl):19-27. doi: 10.1177/1403494818765702.
4
Is the Salut Programme an effective and cost-effective universal health promotion intervention for parents and their children? A register-based retrospective observational study.“健康问候计划”对父母及其子女而言,是一项有效且具成本效益的全民健康促进干预措施吗?一项基于登记的回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 21;7(9):e016732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016732.
5
Equitable health services for the young? A decomposition of income-related inequalities in young adults' utilization of health care in Northern Sweden.为年轻人提供公平的医疗服务?瑞典北部年轻人医疗保健利用方面与收入相关的不平等分解
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 18;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0520-3.
6
Early-life income inequality and adolescent health and well-being.早期生活中的收入不平等与青少年的健康和幸福。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;174:197-208. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Salut Programme: a universal health promotion intervention for parents and children-protocol of a register-based retrospective observational study.萨卢特计划的有效性和成本效益:一项针对父母和儿童的全民健康促进干预措施——基于登记册的回顾性观察性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 4;6(8):e011202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011202.
8
conindex: Estimation of concentration indices.浓度指数:浓度指数的估计。
Stata J. 2016;16(1):112-138.
9
Associations between toddlers' and parents' BMI, in relation to family socio-demography: a cross-sectional study.幼儿与父母的体重指数与家庭社会人口统计学的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 17;15:1252. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2602-8.
10
Early-life origins of life-cycle well-being: research and policy implications.生命周期幸福感的生命周期起源:研究和政策意义。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2015 Winter;34(1):208-42. doi: 10.1002/pam.21805.