• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过癌症协作试验组会议的实时虚拟形式应对全球大流行:TROG 2020的经验

Adapting to a global pandemic through live virtual delivery of a cancer collaborative trial group conference: The TROG 2020 experience.

作者信息

McDowell Lachlan, Goode Susan, Sundaresan Puma

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jun;64(3):414-421. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13047. Epub 2020 May 9.

DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.13047
PMID:32304265
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The global COVID-19 pandemic forced the cancellation of the TROG 2020 face to face Annual Scientific Meeting (ASM). It was instead delivered as a live virtual meeting with 6 days of planning. Here, we report the participants' experience of this live virtual meeting.

METHOD

Participants were invited to complete custom-developed, pre- and post-meeting surveys to assess their expectations of and satisfaction with the live virtual format. Speakers and moderators were also invited to complete a custom-developed satisfaction survey. The working parties of TROG (head/neck/skin, genitourinary, breast and lung) were also sampled.

RESULTS

In total, 188/273 (69%) registered participants logged in to the live virtual meeting. The online engagement for each of the oral sessions ranged from 53 to 66%. There were 102 and 57 responders to the online pre- and post-meeting surveys, respectively. The majority of pre-meeting responders indicated a significant level of employer support to attend the virtual meeting. Post-meeting satisfaction exceeded pre-meeting expectations ('very much' and 'quite a bit'; 86% vs. 54%; P < 0.0001). The majority indicated they would be 'quite a bit' or 'very much' interested in future live virtual meetings.

CONCLUSION

The TROG 2020 ASM was conducted as a live virtual meeting. Participant satisfaction and future interest in a live virtual meeting was high, indicating this is a viable platform for other CCTG's faced with the decision to deliver virtual content at times of global public health threats.

摘要

引言

全球新冠疫情迫使TROG 2020年度科学会议(ASM)取消了面对面会议形式。取而代之的是,经过6天的筹备,以现场直播的虚拟会议形式举行。在此,我们报告参与者对此次现场直播虚拟会议的体验。

方法

邀请参与者完成专门定制的会前和会后调查问卷,以评估他们对现场直播虚拟会议形式的期望和满意度。还邀请了演讲者和主持人完成一份专门定制的满意度调查问卷。同时也对TROG的各工作小组(头颈/皮肤、泌尿生殖、乳腺和肺部)进行了抽样调查。

结果

共有188/273(69%)的注册参与者登录了现场直播虚拟会议。每场口头报告的在线参与率在53%至66%之间。会前和会后在线调查问卷的回复者分别有102人和57人。大多数会前回复者表示雇主大力支持他们参加虚拟会议。会后满意度超过了会前预期(“非常”和“相当”满意;86%对54%;P<0.0001)。大多数人表示他们会“相当”或“非常”有兴趣参加未来的现场直播虚拟会议。

结论

TROG 2020年度科学会议以现场直播虚拟会议的形式举行。参与者对现场直播虚拟会议的满意度和未来兴趣很高,这表明对于其他面临在全球公共卫生威胁时期提供虚拟内容决策的加拿大临床试验联盟组织来说,这是一个可行的平台。

相似文献

1
Adapting to a global pandemic through live virtual delivery of a cancer collaborative trial group conference: The TROG 2020 experience.通过癌症协作试验组会议的实时虚拟形式应对全球大流行:TROG 2020的经验
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jun;64(3):414-421. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13047. Epub 2020 May 9.
2
Transitioning to Virtual: ACMT's 2020 Annual Scientific Meeting.向虚拟会议转变:美国毒理学会2020年年度科学会议
J Med Toxicol. 2020 Oct;16(4):353-355. doi: 10.1007/s13181-020-00807-2. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
3
Pre-graduation medical training including virtual reality during COVID-19 pandemic: a report on students' perception.新冠疫情期间的毕业前医学培训,包括虚拟现实:学生感知报告。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 25;20(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02245-8.
4
Ophthalmology conferences in the coronavirus disease 2019 era.新冠疫情时代的眼科学术会议。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;31(5):396-402. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000688.
5
ACC.20: Impact of social media at the virtual scientific sessions during the COVID-19 pandemic.ACC.20:新冠疫情期间虚拟科学会议上社交媒体的影响。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Sep;43(9):944-948. doi: 10.1002/clc.23387. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
Attendee Survey and Practical Appraisal of a Telegram®-Based Dermatology Congress During the COVID-19 Confinement.新冠疫情封锁期间基于Telegram®的皮肤病学大会参会者调查与实践评估
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2020 Dec;111(10):852-860. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
Orchestrating a virtual conference amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间筹备一场虚拟会议。
Dermatol Online J. 2020 Jul 15;26(7):13030/qt5h19t1jx.
8
Conducting an international curriculum review meeting in the age of COVID-19.在新冠疫情时代举行国际课程评审会议。
Can J Surg. 2020 Sep-Oct;63(5):E418-E421. doi: 10.1503/cjs.014820.
9
Reflections on the upsurge of virtual cancer conferences during the COVID-19 pandemic.对 COVID-19 大流行期间虚拟癌症会议热潮的反思。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Sep;123(5):698-699. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-1000-x. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
10
Virtual meetings and social isolation in COVID-19 times: transposable barriers.新冠疫情时期的虚拟会议与社交隔离:可跨越的障碍
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2020 Jul-Sep;42(3):221-222. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2020-0065.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring continuing medical education conference impact and attendee experience: a scoping review.衡量继续医学教育会议的影响和参会者体验:一项范围综述
Int J Med Educ. 2024 Feb 29;15:15-33. doi: 10.5116/ijme.65cc.8c88.
2
Australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: An online cross-sectional study.澳大利亚医学放射从业者继续教育发展的观点:一项在线横断面研究。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2023 Sep;70(3):270-282. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.691. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
3
Integration of virtual platforms for enhanced conference experience: Data-based evidence from the Society of Interdisciplinary Placebo Studies 2021 conference.
整合虚拟平台以提升会议体验:来自2021年跨学科安慰剂研究学会会议的基于数据的证据
Front Commun (Lausanne). 2022;7. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.857661. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
4
Virtual educational meetings and activities during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: Egyptian oncologists' experience.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间及之后的虚拟教育会议和活动:埃及肿瘤学家的经验
Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 Aug 16;15:1275. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1275. eCollection 2021.
5
Anatomical societies find new ways to come together in a post-Covid world.解剖学会在新冠疫情后探索新的合作方式。
Anat Sci Educ. 2021 Nov;14(6):739-751. doi: 10.1002/ase.2135. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
6
Full Abstract to Published Manuscript: Evaluation of the Scientific Impact of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Conference.全文摘要至已发表的论文:美国乳腺外科学会会议的科学影响力评估。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(10):5752-5757. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10493-1. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
7
The Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Training: the Past, the Present and the Future.2019年冠状病毒病对外科培训的影响:过去、现在与未来
Indian J Surg. 2022 Apr;84(Suppl 1):131-138. doi: 10.1007/s12262-021-02964-2. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
8
Victoria (Australia) radiotherapy response to working through the first and second wave of COVID-19: Strategies and staffing.澳大利亚维多利亚州在应对 COVID-19 第一波和第二波疫情时的放射治疗反应:策略和人员配备。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jun;65(3):374-383. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13186. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
9
Participation in Virtual Urology Conferences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study.新冠疫情期间参与虚拟泌尿外科学术会议:横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 21;23(4):e24369. doi: 10.2196/24369.
10
The Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group 2020 Spring Symposium: Is Virtual the New Reality?《放射肿瘤学教育协作研究组 2020 年春季研讨会:虚拟是新的现实吗?》
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Jun 1;110(2):315-321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.026. Epub 2020 Dec 26.