Suppr超能文献

通过癌症协作试验组会议的实时虚拟形式应对全球大流行:TROG 2020的经验

Adapting to a global pandemic through live virtual delivery of a cancer collaborative trial group conference: The TROG 2020 experience.

作者信息

McDowell Lachlan, Goode Susan, Sundaresan Puma

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jun;64(3):414-421. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13047. Epub 2020 May 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The global COVID-19 pandemic forced the cancellation of the TROG 2020 face to face Annual Scientific Meeting (ASM). It was instead delivered as a live virtual meeting with 6 days of planning. Here, we report the participants' experience of this live virtual meeting.

METHOD

Participants were invited to complete custom-developed, pre- and post-meeting surveys to assess their expectations of and satisfaction with the live virtual format. Speakers and moderators were also invited to complete a custom-developed satisfaction survey. The working parties of TROG (head/neck/skin, genitourinary, breast and lung) were also sampled.

RESULTS

In total, 188/273 (69%) registered participants logged in to the live virtual meeting. The online engagement for each of the oral sessions ranged from 53 to 66%. There were 102 and 57 responders to the online pre- and post-meeting surveys, respectively. The majority of pre-meeting responders indicated a significant level of employer support to attend the virtual meeting. Post-meeting satisfaction exceeded pre-meeting expectations ('very much' and 'quite a bit'; 86% vs. 54%; P < 0.0001). The majority indicated they would be 'quite a bit' or 'very much' interested in future live virtual meetings.

CONCLUSION

The TROG 2020 ASM was conducted as a live virtual meeting. Participant satisfaction and future interest in a live virtual meeting was high, indicating this is a viable platform for other CCTG's faced with the decision to deliver virtual content at times of global public health threats.

摘要

引言

全球新冠疫情迫使TROG 2020年度科学会议(ASM)取消了面对面会议形式。取而代之的是,经过6天的筹备,以现场直播的虚拟会议形式举行。在此,我们报告参与者对此次现场直播虚拟会议的体验。

方法

邀请参与者完成专门定制的会前和会后调查问卷,以评估他们对现场直播虚拟会议形式的期望和满意度。还邀请了演讲者和主持人完成一份专门定制的满意度调查问卷。同时也对TROG的各工作小组(头颈/皮肤、泌尿生殖、乳腺和肺部)进行了抽样调查。

结果

共有188/273(69%)的注册参与者登录了现场直播虚拟会议。每场口头报告的在线参与率在53%至66%之间。会前和会后在线调查问卷的回复者分别有102人和57人。大多数会前回复者表示雇主大力支持他们参加虚拟会议。会后满意度超过了会前预期(“非常”和“相当”满意;86%对54%;P<0.0001)。大多数人表示他们会“相当”或“非常”有兴趣参加未来的现场直播虚拟会议。

结论

TROG 2020年度科学会议以现场直播虚拟会议的形式举行。参与者对现场直播虚拟会议的满意度和未来兴趣很高,这表明对于其他面临在全球公共卫生威胁时期提供虚拟内容决策的加拿大临床试验联盟组织来说,这是一个可行的平台。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验