• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域麻醉下非药物性产科干预对分娩不良结局的影响。

Influence of non-pharmacological obstetric interventions on adverse outcomes of childbirth under regional analgesia.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Maternity School Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua das Laranjeiras, 180 (Laranjeiras), Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22240-003, Brazil.

Department of Statistics, Fluminense Federal University, Rua Professor Marcos Waldemar de Freitas Reis, Campus do Gragoatá (São Domingos), Niterói, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2020 Jun 25;48(5):495-503. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0366.

DOI:10.1515/jpm-2019-0366
PMID:32304310
Abstract

Background We examined the influence of companionship and the use of complementary therapies on adverse outcomes in parturients under regional analgesia. Methods This study is a single-center retrospective cohort of 986 term pregnant women, and it was based on data from medical records (hospitalization period: November 2012-November 2018). The women were in the active phase of labor under regional analgesia. A statistical program was used to search for an association between companionship and the use of complementary therapies with sample data. Bi- and multivariate logistic regressions based on significant associations were used to analyze the potential intervening variables in the adverse outcomes. Results Models were constructed for each of the maternal adverse outcomes. Childbirth complications were significantly associated with complementary therapies [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.28-0.63; P < 0.001] and companionship (AOR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.22-0.57; P < 0.001). Prolonged maternal hospitalization was significantly associated with companionship (AOR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.36-0.92; P < 0.05). Unplanned cesarean section showed a significant association with complementary therapies (AOR = 0.05; 95% CI = 0.01-0.47; P < 0.01). Conclusion The likelihood of childbirth complications and prolonged maternal hospitalization is reduced by companionship, whereas the likelihood of childbirth complications and cesarean section rates is reduced by the use of complementary therapies.

摘要

背景

我们研究了陪伴和使用补充疗法对接受区域镇痛的产妇不良结局的影响。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了 986 名足月妊娠妇女,数据来自病历(住院期间:2012 年 11 月至 2018 年 11 月)。这些妇女在区域镇痛下处于活跃分娩期。统计程序用于搜索陪伴和使用补充疗法与样本数据之间的关联。基于显著关联的双变量和多变量逻辑回归用于分析不良结局的潜在干预变量。

结果

为每种产妇不良结局构建了模型。分娩并发症与补充疗法显著相关(调整后的优势比 [AOR] = 0.42;95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.28-0.63;P < 0.001)和陪伴(AOR = 0.36;95%CI = 0.22-0.57;P < 0.001)。产妇住院时间延长与陪伴显著相关(AOR = 0.57;95%CI = 0.36-0.92;P < 0.05)。计划外剖宫产与补充疗法显著相关(AOR = 0.05;95%CI = 0.01-0.47;P < 0.01)。

结论

陪伴可降低分娩并发症和产妇住院时间延长的可能性,而使用补充疗法可降低分娩并发症和剖宫产率的可能性。

相似文献

1
Influence of non-pharmacological obstetric interventions on adverse outcomes of childbirth under regional analgesia.区域麻醉下非药物性产科干预对分娩不良结局的影响。
J Perinat Med. 2020 Jun 25;48(5):495-503. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0366.
2
[Effects of double-catheter epidural analgesia by lidocaine injection respectively on the delivery outcomes and maternal-infant complications for persistent posterior or lateral occipital position of protracted active phase].利多卡因分别双侧导管硬膜外注射用于活跃期持续性枕后位或枕横位分娩结局及母婴并发症的影响
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 25;55(7):457-464. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20191228-00705.
3
The impact of obstetric interventions and complications on women's satisfaction with childbirth a population based cohort study including 16,000 women.产科干预和并发症对产妇分娩满意度的影响:一项基于人群的队列研究,纳入了 16000 名女性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 11;19(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2633-8.
4
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mode of Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.剖宫产麻醉方式中的种族和民族差异。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Feb;122(2):472-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000679.
5
Regional anesthesia and analgesia in obstetrics.产科区域麻醉与镇痛
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;5(5):652-6.
6
Adverse obstetric outcomes among female childhood and adolescent cancer survivors in Sweden: A population-based matched cohort study.瑞典女性儿童和青少年癌症幸存者的不良产科结局:一项基于人群的匹配队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Dec;98(12):1603-1611. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13690. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
7
Prevalence of Prolonged Latent Phase and Labor Outcomes: Review of Birth Records in a Swedish Population.产程潜伏期延长的患病率及分娩结局:瑞典人群出生记录回顾
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):33-44. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12704.
8
Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.首次分娩对女性分娩方式偏好变化的影响:一项纵向观察性研究的随访
Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x.
9
Maternal Body Mass Index and Regional Anaesthesia Use at Term: Prevalence and Complications.足月时孕妇体重指数与区域麻醉的使用:患病率及并发症
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;31(6):495-505. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12387. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
10
Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.健康初产妇分娩时医疗服务提供者类型与剖宫产之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):159-168. doi: 10.1111/birt.12334. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for childbirth delivery and pain relief methods among pregnant women in Vietnam.越南孕妇对分娩方式及疼痛缓解方法的偏好
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 30;11:1290232. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1290232. eCollection 2024.