• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Long-term outcomes in the management of left main disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Terentes-Printzios Dimitrios, Kotronias Rafail A, De Maria Giovanni Luigi, Scarsini Roberto, Banning Adrian P

机构信息

Oxford Heart Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.

Oxford Heart Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Hellenic J Cardiol. 2021 Jan-Feb;62(1):87-88. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.hjc.2020.04.006
PMID:32304817
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes in the management of left main disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.左主干病变管理的长期结局：随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2021 Jan-Feb;62(1):87-88. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病：随机试验的荟萃分析。
Am Heart J. 2020 Sep;227:9-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
3
Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):541-552. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26970. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
4
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对多支血管病变患者长期死亡率和发病率的影响：动脉搭桥和支架时代随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):223-30. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12844.
5
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Left Main Disease: Pre- and Post-EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE Everolimus Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) and NOBLE (Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularization Study) Era.左主干疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：EXCEL（评价依维莫司洗脱支架 XIENCE 与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干血运重建效果）和 NOBLE（北欧-波罗的海-英国左主干血运重建研究）时代之前和之后。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.004792.
6
Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉血运重建与冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床结局：6项随机试验和4686例患者的荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 18.
7
Long term outcomes of new generation drug eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel and/or left main coronary artery disease. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.新一代药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗多支和/或左主干冠状动脉疾病的长期结局：随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Sep;19(6):671-678. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
8
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较？一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Jun;35(3). doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12260.
9
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较：外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
10
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病：随机试验的荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:142-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-center, international, randomized, 2-year, parallel-group study to assess the superiority of IVUS-guided PCI versus qualitative angio-guided PCI in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease: Study protocol for OPTIMAL trial.多中心、国际、随机、2 年、平行分组研究，旨在评估血管内超声指导的 PCI 与定性血管造影指导的 PCI 在非保护左主干冠状动脉（ULMCA）疾病中的优越性：OPTIMAL 试验研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 7;17(1):e0260770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260770. eCollection 2022.