Sloane M E, Owsley C, Jackson C A
Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294.
J Opt Soc Am A. 1988 Dec;5(12):2181-90. doi: 10.1364/josaa.5.002181.
Contrast sensitivity as a function of target luminance for four spatial frequencies (0.5, 2, 4, and 8 cycles/deg) was measured in younger (n = 12; age range, 19-35 years) and older (n = 11; age range, 68-79 years) adults in order to examine the feasibility of optical and neural explanations for the impairment of contrast sensitivity in older adults. All subjects were free from identifiable ocular disease and had good acuity. Sensitivity for each spatial frequency was measured at eight luminance levels spanning 3.5 log units in the photopic-mesopic range. When gratings were flickered at 0.5 Hz, functions for older adults were displaced downward on the sensitivity axis across all luminance levels, and the slopes of these functions were steeper than those for younger adults, suggesting that optical mechanisms alone cannot account for the vision loss in older adults. Further measurements, in which spatial targets were flickered at 7.5 Hz, indicated that this faster temporal modulation affected sensitivity as a function of luminance differentially in younger and older adults. These data imply that the neural mechanisms subserving human spatial vision undergo significant changes during adulthood.
为了研究光学和神经学解释老年人对比敏感度受损的可行性,我们测量了年轻成年人(n = 12;年龄范围19 - 35岁)和年长成年人(n = 11;年龄范围68 - 79岁)在四种空间频率(0.5、2、4和8周/度)下对比敏感度随目标亮度的变化情况。所有受试者均无明显眼部疾病且视力良好。在明视觉 - 中间视觉范围内,跨越3.5个对数单位的八个亮度水平下测量了每个空间频率的敏感度。当光栅以0.5赫兹闪烁时,年长成年人在所有亮度水平下的敏感度函数在敏感度轴上向下偏移,且这些函数的斜率比年轻成年人的更陡,这表明仅光学机制无法解释老年人的视力丧失。进一步的测量中,空间目标以7.5赫兹闪烁,结果表明这种更快的时间调制对年轻和年长成年人的敏感度随亮度的变化有不同影响。这些数据表明,在成年期,支持人类空间视觉的神经机制会发生显著变化。