Centre for Human Drug Research, 2333 CL Leiden, The Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Centre for Human Drug Research, 2333 CL Leiden, The Netherlands.
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:515-528. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.033. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
Following an infection, cytokines not only regulate the acute immune response, but also contribute to symptoms such as inflammatory hyperalgesia. We aimed to characterize the acute inflammatory response induced by a human endotoxemia model, and its effect on pain perception using evoked pain tests in two different dose levels. We also attempted to determine whether combining a human endotoxemia challenge with measurement of pain thresholds in healthy subjects could serve as a model to study drug effects on inflammatory pain.
This was a placebo-controlled, randomized, cross-over study in 24 healthy males. Twelve subjects were administered a bolus of 1 ng/kg LPS intravenously, and twelve 2 ng/kg LPS. Before days of placebo/LPS administration, subjects completed a full study day without study drug administration, but with identical pain threshold testing. Blood sampling and evoked pain tests (electrical burst and -stair, heat, pressure, and cold pressor test) were performed pre-dose and at frequent intervals up to 10hr post-dose. Data were analysed with a repeated-measures ANCOVA. For both dose levels, LPS induced an evident acute inflammatory response, but did not significantly affect any of the pain modalities. In a post-hoc analysis, lowering of pain thresholds was observed in the first 3 h after dosing, corresponding with the peak of the acute inflammatory response around 1-3 h post-dose.
Mild acute systemic inflammation, as induced by 1 ng/kg and 2 ng/kg LPS intravenous administration, did not significantly change pain thresholds in this study. The endotoxemia model in combination with evoked pain tests is not suitable to study acute inflammatory hyperalgesia in healthy males.
感染后,细胞因子不仅调节急性免疫反应,还导致炎症性痛觉过敏等症状。我们旨在描述人类内毒素血症模型诱导的急性炎症反应,并在两个不同剂量水平下使用诱发疼痛测试来研究其对疼痛感知的影响。我们还试图确定在健康受试者中结合人类内毒素血症挑战和疼痛阈值测量是否可以作为研究药物对炎症性疼痛影响的模型。
这是一项在 24 名健康男性中进行的安慰剂对照、随机、交叉研究。12 名受试者静脉内给予 1ng/kg LPS 冲击剂量,12 名受试者给予 2ng/kg LPS。在给予安慰剂/LPS 前几天,受试者在没有研究药物给药的情况下完成了完整的研究日,但进行了相同的疼痛阈值测试。在给药前和给药后频繁间隔(最多 10 小时)进行采血和诱发疼痛测试(电爆发和 -阶梯、热、压力和冷加压测试)。使用重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析。对于两个剂量水平,LPS 均引起明显的急性炎症反应,但对任何疼痛模式均无显著影响。在事后分析中,在给药后 3 小时内观察到疼痛阈值降低,与 1-3 小时给药后急性炎症反应的峰值相对应。
静脉内给予 1ng/kg 和 2ng/kg LPS 引起的轻度急性全身炎症在本研究中并未显著改变疼痛阈值。该内毒素血症模型结合诱发疼痛测试不适合用于研究健康男性的急性炎症性痛觉过敏。