Suppr超能文献

剪切波弹性成像联合超声造影在TI-RADS 4a和4b类结节中的增量诊断价值

Incremental diagnostic value of shear wave elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in TI-RADS category 4a and 4b nodules.

作者信息

Huang Shao-Ting, Zhang Bo, Yin Hong-Ling, Li Bo, Liao Jin-Tang, Wang Yi-Bin

机构信息

Department of Health Management Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Department of Medical Ultrasound, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87, Xiangya Rd, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.

出版信息

J Med Ultrason (2001). 2020 Jul;47(3):453-462. doi: 10.1007/s10396-020-01016-8. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in diagnosing thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) category 4a and 4b nodules.

METHODS

TI-RADS, SWE, and CEUS features of 71 thyroid nodules (23 benign, 48 malignant) confirmed by postoperative pathological results were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnostic efficiency of each single method and that of a combination of three methods were compared.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing thyroid nodules were 70.83% and 65.22% for TI-RADS, 68.75% and 91.30% for SWE, 77.08% and 78.26% for CEUS, and 91.67% and 95.65% for TI-RADS + SWE + CEUS, respectively. The area under the curve for TI-RADS, SWE, CEUS, and TI-RADS + SWE + CEUS in diagnosing thyroid nodules were 0.680, 0.839, 0.799, and 0.937, respectively. A significant difference was observed between a combination of the three methods and any of them alone (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Combining SWE and CEUS improves the differential diagnosis of TI-RADS category 4a and 4b nodules.

摘要

目的

评估剪切波弹性成像(SWE)联合超声造影(CEUS)在诊断甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)4a类和4b类结节中的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析71个经术后病理结果证实的甲状腺结节(23个良性,48个恶性)的TI-RADS、SWE和CEUS特征。比较每种单一方法以及三种方法联合使用的诊断效率。

结果

TI-RADS诊断甲状腺结节的敏感性和特异性分别为70.83%和65.22%,SWE为68.75%和91.30%,CEUS为77.08%和78.26%,TI-RADS + SWE + CEUS为91.67%和95.65%。TI-RADS、SWE、CEUS以及TI-RADS + SWE + CEUS诊断甲状腺结节的曲线下面积分别为0.680、0.839、0.799和0.937。三种方法联合使用与任何一种单独方法之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。

结论

SWE和CEUS联合使用可提高TI-RADS 4a类和4b类结节的鉴别诊断能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验