Suppr超能文献

具有选择性激动和拮抗特性的神经垂体肽的设计。

Design of neurohypophyseal peptides that exhibit selective agonistic and antagonistic properties.

作者信息

Manning M, Lowbridge J, Haldar J, Sawyer W H

出版信息

Fed Proc. 1977 May;36(6):1848-52.

PMID:323064
Abstract

Within the spectrum of the characteristic pharmacological activities (oxytocic (O), milk-ejecting (ME), antidiuretic (A), pressor (P) associated with the known natural and synthetic analogs of oxytocin and vasopressin it is possible to discern patterns of selectivity of these types: 1) interpeptide-like (a) O/A, (b) O/P; 2) intraoxytocin-like (a) O/ME; (b) ME/O; 3) intravasopressinlike (a) A/P, (b) P/A. Consideration of structural modifications of oxytocin or vasopressin, which individually or in combination give rise to peptides possessing enhanced selectivity of a given type, can in some cases provide a rational basis for the design of peptides with even greater selectivity. [1-Deamino-4-valine-8-D-arginine]vasopressin, the most highly specific antidiuretic peptide known to date, was designed in this fashion. By contrast, intraoxytocin-like selectivity, is manifested to only a minor degree in all peptides studied to date. Enhanced interpeptide-like selectivity of the type 1a (O/A; O/P) is readily attainable by specific single substitutions at positions 4 or 7 in oxtocin. Substitution of threonine in the 4 position of the oxytocic antagonist [1-deaminopenicillamine]oxytocin brought about a threefold enhancement in oxytocic inhibitory activity. Thus [1-deaminopenicillamine-4-threonine]oxytocin (dPTOT) is the most potent antagonist of the in vitro oxytocic response to oxytocin known to date. Thus analysis of the pharmacological data from over 300 analogs of oxytocin and vasopressin allows the delineation of those structural modifications that can optimize selectivities. The potential and limitations of this approach for the design of peptides possessing desired agonistic or antagonistic selectivity for potential clinical use and for studies on oxytocin and vasopressin receptors is discussed.

摘要

在与已知的催产素和加压素天然及合成类似物相关的特征性药理活性谱(催产素样(O)、排乳(ME)、抗利尿(A)、升压(P))范围内,可以辨别出这些类型的选择性模式:1)肽间样(a)O/A,(b)O/P;2)催产素内样(a)O/ME;(b)ME/O;3)加压素内样(a)A/P,(b)P/A。考虑催产素或加压素的结构修饰,这些修饰单独或组合产生具有特定类型增强选择性的肽,在某些情况下可为设计具有更高选择性的肽提供合理依据。[1-脱氨基-4-缬氨酸-8-D-精氨酸]加压素是迄今为止已知的特异性最高的抗利尿肽,就是以这种方式设计的。相比之下,催产素内样选择性在迄今为止研究的所有肽中仅表现出较小程度。通过在催产素的4位或7位进行特定的单取代,很容易实现1a型(O/A;O/P)增强的肽间样选择性。催产素拮抗剂[1-脱氨青霉胺]催产素4位的苏氨酸取代使催产素抑制活性提高了三倍。因此,[1-脱氨青霉胺-4-苏氨酸]催产素(dPTOT)是迄今为止已知的对催产素体外催产素反应最有效的拮抗剂。因此,对300多种催产素和加压素类似物的药理数据进行分析,可以勾勒出那些能够优化选择性的结构修饰。讨论了这种方法在设计对潜在临床应用具有所需激动或拮抗选择性的肽以及研究催产素和加压素受体方面的潜力和局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验