• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在荷兰基于粪便免疫化学测试的筛查项目中加入在线验证的家族史调查问卷并未提高其诊断收益。

Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Foundation of Population Screening Mid-West, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2020 Jun;122(12):1865-1871. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0832-8. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1038/s41416-020-0832-8
PMID:32307443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7283285/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is suboptimal in detecting advanced neoplasia (AN). To increase the sensitivity and yield of a FIT-based screening programme, FIT could be combined with risk factors for AN. We evaluated the incremental yield of adding a family history questionnaire (FHQ) on colorectal cancer (CRC) and Lynch syndrome-associated tumours to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme.

METHODS

Six thousand screen-naive individuals, aged 59-75 years, were invited to complete a FIT (FOB-Gold, cut-off 47 µg Hb/g faeces) and a validated online FHQ. Participants with a positive FIT and/or positive FHQ, confirmed after genetic counselling, were referred for colonoscopy. Yield of detecting AN per 1000 invitees for the combined strategy was compared with the FIT-only strategy.

RESULTS

Of the 5979 invitees, 1952 (32.6%) completed the FIT only, 2379 (39.8%) completed both the FIT and FHQ and 95 (1.6%) completed the FHQ only. Addition of the FHQ to FIT-based screening resulted in one extra case of AN detected after 16 additional colonoscopies, resulting in a yield of 19.6 (95% CI, 16.4-23.5) for the combined strategy versus 19.5 (95% CI, 16.3-23.3) for the FIT-only strategy (p = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of an FHQ to one round of FIT screening did not increase the detection of AN compared with FIT only (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02698462).

摘要

背景

粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)在检测高级别肿瘤(AN)方面效果不佳。为了提高基于 FIT 的筛查方案的敏感性和收益,FIT 可与 AN 的风险因素相结合。我们评估了在荷兰基于 FIT 的筛查计划中,增加了结直肠癌(CRC)和林奇综合征相关肿瘤家族史问卷(FHQ)对 FIT 的附加收益。

方法

我们邀请了 6000 名无筛查史、年龄在 59-75 岁的个体完成 FIT(FOB-Gold,截止值 47μg Hb/g 粪便)和经过验证的在线 FHQ。对 FIT 和/或经遗传咨询后确认的阳性 FHQ 的参与者进行结肠镜检查。每 1000 名受邀者中,比较了联合策略检测 AN 的收益与仅 FIT 策略。

结果

在 5979 名受邀者中,1952 名(32.6%)仅完成了 FIT,2379 名(39.8%)同时完成了 FIT 和 FHQ,95 名(1.6%)仅完成了 FHQ。将 FHQ 添加到基于 FIT 的筛查中,额外进行 16 次结肠镜检查后,可多检出 1 例 AN,联合策略的收益为 19.6(95%CI,16.4-23.5),而仅 FIT 策略的收益为 19.5(95%CI,16.3-23.3)(p=1.0)。

结论

与仅 FIT 相比,将 FHQ 添加到一轮 FIT 筛查中并不能增加 AN 的检出率(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02698462)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66c/7283285/5572eb86f404/41416_2020_832_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66c/7283285/37d2d1c6bd9c/41416_2020_832_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66c/7283285/6f4191485ce5/41416_2020_832_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66c/7283285/5572eb86f404/41416_2020_832_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66c/7283285/37d2d1c6bd9c/41416_2020_832_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66c/7283285/6f4191485ce5/41416_2020_832_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66c/7283285/5572eb86f404/41416_2020_832_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield.在荷兰基于粪便免疫化学测试的筛查项目中加入在线验证的家族史调查问卷并未提高其诊断收益。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Jun;122(12):1865-1871. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0832-8. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
2
Adding family history to faecal immunochemical testing increases the detection of advanced neoplasia in a colorectal cancer screening programme.在结直肠癌筛查项目中,将家族史纳入粪便免疫化学检测可提高晚期肿瘤的检出率。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Jul;44(1):88-96. doi: 10.1111/apt.13660. Epub 2016 May 12.
3
Performance of two faecal immunochemical tests for the detection of advanced neoplasia at different positivity thresholds: a cross-sectional study of the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening programme.两种粪便免疫化学检测试验在不同阳性截断值下检测晚期肿瘤的性能:荷兰国家结直肠癌筛查计划的一项横断面研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;4(2):111-118. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30319-4. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
4
Equivalent Accuracy of 2 Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Detecting Advanced Neoplasia in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.两种定量粪便免疫化学检测在有组织结直肠癌筛查项目中检测高级别腺瘤的准确性相当。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1392-1399.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
5
Multiple rounds of one sample versus two sample faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study.单份样本与双份粪便免疫化学试验在基于人群的结直肠癌筛查中的多次检测:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;4(8):622-631. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30176-1. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Diagnostic yield of a risk model versus faecal immunochemical test only: a randomised controlled trial in a colorectal cancer screening programme.风险模型与粪便免疫化学检测单独应用的诊断效果:一项在结直肠癌筛查计划中的随机对照试验。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Sep;129(5):791-796. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02358-z. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
7
The second round of the Dutch colorectal cancer screening program: Impact of an increased fecal immunochemical test cut-off level on yield of screening.荷兰结直肠癌筛查项目第二轮:粪便免疫化学检测截断值提高对筛查效果的影响。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Aug 15;147(4):1098-1106. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32839. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
A randomised comparison of two faecal immunochemical tests in population-based colorectal cancer screening.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查中两种粪便免疫化学检测的随机比较。
Gut. 2017 Nov;66(11):1975-1982. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311819. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
9
Switching from guaiac to immunochemical faecal occult blood test increases participation and diagnostic yield of colorectal cancer screening.从愈创木脂检测切换至免疫化学粪便隐血检测可提高结直肠癌筛查的参与率和诊断率。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Oct;51(10):1461-1469. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
Effects of Increasing Screening Age and Fecal Hemoglobin Cutoff Concentrations in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.增加结直肠癌筛查计划的筛查年龄和粪便血红蛋白截断浓度的效果。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec;14(12):1771-1777. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Liquid Biopsy as a Source of Nucleic Acid Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Management of Lynch Syndrome.液体活检作为林奇综合征诊断和管理中核酸生物标志物的来源。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 13;23(8):4284. doi: 10.3390/ijms23084284.
2
A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions.风险分层肠道筛查的范围综述:当前证据,未来方向。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 May;33(5):653-685. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
3
Risk-stratified selection to colonoscopy in FIT colorectal cancer screening: development and temporal validation of a prediction model.

本文引用的文献

1
The frequency of a positive family history for colorectal cancer: a population-based study in the Netherlands.结直肠癌家族史阳性的频率:荷兰一项基于人群的研究
Neth J Med. 2006 Nov;64(10):367-70.
基于 FIT 的结直肠癌筛查中对结肠镜检查的风险分层选择:预测模型的开发和时间验证。
Br J Cancer. 2022 May;126(8):1229-1235. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01709-6. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
4
Comparative yield and efficiency of strategies based on risk assessment and fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: A cross-sectional population-based analysis.基于风险评估和粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查策略的比较产量和效率:一项基于人群的横断面分析。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2021 Aug 31;33(4):512-521. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.04.08.