• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险模型与粪便免疫化学检测单独应用的诊断效果:一项在结直肠癌筛查计划中的随机对照试验。

Diagnostic yield of a risk model versus faecal immunochemical test only: a randomised controlled trial in a colorectal cancer screening programme.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2023 Sep;129(5):791-796. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02358-z. Epub 2023 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1038/s41416-023-02358-z
PMID:37468570
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10449911/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Combining the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) result with risk factors for advanced neoplasia (AN) may increase the yield of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening without increasing the number of colonoscopies. We conducted a randomised controlled trial in the Dutch CRC screening programme to evaluate a previously developed risk model including FIT, age, sex, smoking status, and CRC family history.

METHODS

A total of 22,748 individuals aged 56-75 years were pre-randomised to the risk-model group or the FIT-only group. Both groups received the FIT; those allocated to the risk-model group also received a single-page questionnaire. Study participants with a positive result (FIT ≥ 15 µg Hb/g faeces and/or risk ≥0.10) were referred for colonoscopy. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of invitees in whom AN was detected.

RESULTS

In the risk-model group, 3113/11,364 invitees (27%) returned the FIT and questionnaire versus 3061/11,384 invitees (27%) in the FIT-only group (p = 0.40). The yield of AN was 3.70/1000 invitees in the risk-model group versus 3.43/1000 in the FIT-only group (absolute difference: 0.27/1000, 95%CI: -1.30 to 1.82, p = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining FIT with risk factors for CRC did not increase the yield of AN compared to FIT-only in an existing CRC screening programme. There was no difference in participation between groups.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04490551 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

摘要

背景

将粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)结果与高级别肿瘤(AN)的风险因素相结合,可能会增加结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的检出率,而不会增加结肠镜检查的数量。我们在荷兰 CRC 筛查项目中进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估一种以前开发的风险模型,该模型包括 FIT、年龄、性别、吸烟状况和 CRC 家族史。

方法

共有 22748 名年龄在 56-75 岁的个体进行了预随机分组,分为风险模型组或仅 FIT 组。两组均接受 FIT;分配到风险模型组的个体还接受了一份单页问卷。检测结果阳性(FIT≥15μg Hb/g 粪便和/或风险≥0.10)的研究参与者被转介行结肠镜检查。主要结局测量指标是 AN 检出者的比例。

结果

在风险模型组中,11364 名受邀者中有 3113 人(27%)返回了 FIT 和问卷,而在仅 FIT 组中,11384 名受邀者中有 3061 人(27%)(p=0.40)。风险模型组中 AN 的检出率为每 1000 名受邀者 3.70 例,而仅 FIT 组为每 1000 名受邀者 3.43 例(绝对差异:0.27/1000,95%CI:-1.30 至 1.82,p=0.82)。

结论

与仅 FIT 相比,在现有的 CRC 筛查项目中,将 FIT 与 CRC 的风险因素相结合并未增加 AN 的检出率。两组之间的参与率没有差异。

临床试验注册

NCT04490551(ClinicalTrials.gov)。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic yield of a risk model versus faecal immunochemical test only: a randomised controlled trial in a colorectal cancer screening programme.风险模型与粪便免疫化学检测单独应用的诊断效果:一项在结直肠癌筛查计划中的随机对照试验。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Sep;129(5):791-796. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02358-z. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
2
Faecal immunochemical tests versus colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance: an accuracy, acceptability and economic study.粪便免疫化学试验与结肠镜检查用于息肉切除术后监测的比较:一项准确性、可接受性和经济学研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jan;23(1):1-84. doi: 10.3310/hta23010.
3
One or two faecal immunochemical tests in an organised population-based colorectal cancer screening programme in Murcia (Spain).在西班牙穆尔西亚(Murcia)的一个有组织的基于人群的结直肠癌筛查计划中进行一次或两次粪便免疫化学检测。
J Med Screen. 2022 Dec;29(4):231-240. doi: 10.1177/09691413221094919. Epub 2022 May 16.
4
Switching from guaiac to immunochemical faecal occult blood test increases participation and diagnostic yield of colorectal cancer screening.从愈创木脂检测切换至免疫化学粪便隐血检测可提高结直肠癌筛查的参与率和诊断率。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Oct;51(10):1461-1469. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Adding family history to faecal immunochemical testing increases the detection of advanced neoplasia in a colorectal cancer screening programme.在结直肠癌筛查项目中,将家族史纳入粪便免疫化学检测可提高晚期肿瘤的检出率。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Jul;44(1):88-96. doi: 10.1111/apt.13660. Epub 2016 May 12.
6
Diagnostic Yield of One-Time Colonoscopy vs One-Time Flexible Sigmoidoscopy vs Multiple Rounds of Mailed Fecal Immunohistochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening.在结直肠癌筛查中,一次性结肠镜检查与一次性乙状结肠镜检查和多次邮寄粪便免疫化学检测的诊断收益比较。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;18(3):667-675.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
7
Multiple rounds of one sample versus two sample faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study.单份样本与双份粪便免疫化学试验在基于人群的结直肠癌筛查中的多次检测:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;4(8):622-631. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30176-1. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield.在荷兰基于粪便免疫化学测试的筛查项目中加入在线验证的家族史调查问卷并未提高其诊断收益。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Jun;122(12):1865-1871. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0832-8. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
9
Population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes using a faecal immunochemical test: should faecal haemoglobin cut-offs differ by age and sex?使用粪便免疫化学检测的基于人群的结直肠癌筛查项目:粪便血红蛋白临界值应因年龄和性别而异吗?
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3555-3.
10
The multitarget fecal immunochemical test versus the fecal immunochemical test for programmatic colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional intervention study with paired design.多靶点粪便免疫化学试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于结直肠癌筛查项目:一项具有配对设计的横断面干预研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):1299. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10372-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel colorectal cancer screening methods - opportunities and challenges.新型结直肠癌筛查方法——机遇与挑战
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1038/s41571-025-01037-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT).基于 FIT 基础结直肠癌筛查方案中既往 f-Hb 浓度的定制间隔的个性化结直肠癌筛查:基于效果的混合方法研究方案
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 22;23(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02670-1.
2
Combining the Fecal Immunochemical Test with a Logistic Regression Model for Screening Colorectal Neoplasia.将粪便免疫化学检测与逻辑回归模型相结合用于筛查结直肠肿瘤。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Mar 17;12:635481. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.635481. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Participation and Diagnostic Yield of Colonoscopy vs Fecal Immunochemical Test vs Risk-Adapted Screening in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Interim Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (TARGET-C).比较结肠镜检查、粪便免疫化学试验和风险适应筛查在结直肠癌筛查中的参与度和诊断收益:一项多中心随机对照试验(TARGET-C)的中期分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug;115(8):1264-1274. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000624.
4
Faecal haemoglobin concentration among subjects with negative FIT results is associated with the detection rate of neoplasia at subsequent rounds: a prospective study in the context of population based screening programmes in Italy.粪便血红蛋白浓度在 FIT 结果阴性的人群中与后续轮次的肿瘤检出率相关:意大利基于人群筛查项目的前瞻性研究。
Gut. 2020 Mar;69(3):523-530. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318198. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
5
The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system.2019年世界卫生组织消化系统肿瘤分类。
Histopathology. 2020 Jan;76(2):182-188. doi: 10.1111/his.13975. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
Usefulness of risk stratification models for colorectal cancer based on fecal hemoglobin concentration and clinical risk factors.基于粪便血红蛋白浓度和临床危险因素的结直肠癌风险分层模型的实用性。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1204-1211.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
7
Divergent Long-Term Detection Rates of Proximal and Distal Advanced Neoplasia in Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Programs: A Retrospective Cohort Study.粪便免疫化学检测筛查项目中近端和远端晚期腺瘤的长期检出率差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Nov 6;169(9):602-609. doi: 10.7326/M18-0855. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
8
Quality assurance of colonoscopy within the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening program.荷兰国家结直肠癌筛查计划中结肠镜检查的质量保证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jan;89(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
Equivalent Accuracy of 2 Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Detecting Advanced Neoplasia in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.两种定量粪便免疫化学检测在有组织结直肠癌筛查项目中检测高级别腺瘤的准确性相当。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1392-1399.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
10
Effects of Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large Community-Based Population.基于大型社区人群的结直肠癌筛查对癌症发病率和死亡率的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1383-1391.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Jul 19.