Wong Jonathan, Montague Steven, Wallace Paul, Negishi Kay, Liteplo Andrew, Ringrose Jennifer, Dversdal Renee, Buchanan Brian, Desy Janeve, Ma Irene W Y
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Ultrasound J. 2020 Apr 19;12(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00167-6.
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used in internal medicine, but a lack of trained faculty continues to limit the spread of POCUS education. Using a framework based on organizational change theories, this study sought to identify barriers and enablers for hospital-based practicing internists to learn and use POCUS in clinical practice.
We invited practicing internists at six North American institutions to participate in an electronic survey on their opinions regarding 39 barriers and enablers.
Of the 342 participants invited, 170 participated (response rate 49.3%). The top barriers were lack of training (79%), lack of handheld ultrasound devices (78%), lack of direct supervision (65%), lack of time to perform POCUS during rounds (65%), and lack of quality assurance processes (53%). The majority of participants (55%) disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement "My institution provides funding for POCUS training." In general, participants' attitudes towards POCUS were favourable, and future career opportunities and the potential for billing were not considered significant factors by our participants in the decision to learn or use POCUS.
This survey confirms the perceived importance of POCUS to practicing internists. To assist in closing faculty development gap, interventions should address training, supervision, quality assurance processes, availability of handheld devices, as well as dedicated time to perform POCUS during clinical care.
床旁超声(POCUS)在内科中的应用越来越广泛,但缺乏训练有素的教员仍然限制了POCUS教育的推广。本研究基于组织变革理论框架,旨在确定医院执业内科医生在临床实践中学习和使用POCUS的障碍和促进因素。
我们邀请了北美六家机构的执业内科医生参与一项关于他们对39个障碍和促进因素看法的电子调查。
在邀请的342名参与者中,170人参与(回复率49.3%)。最主要的障碍包括缺乏培训(79%)、缺乏手持式超声设备(78%)、缺乏直接监督(65%)、查房期间缺乏时间进行POCUS检查(65%)以及缺乏质量保证流程(53%)。大多数参与者(55%)不同意或强烈不同意“我的机构为POCUS培训提供资金”这一说法。总体而言,参与者对POCUS的态度是积极的,我们的参与者在决定学习或使用POCUS时,未来职业机会和计费潜力并非被视为重要因素。
本次调查证实了POCUS对执业内科医生的重要性。为了帮助缩小教员发展差距,干预措施应涉及培训、监督、质量保证流程、手持式设备的可用性以及临床护理期间进行POCUS检查的专用时间。