• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国,托法替尼治疗活动性银屑病关节炎的成本与健康结果。

Costs and Health Outcomes Associated with Tofacitinib Treatment for Active Psoriatic Arthritis in the United States.

机构信息

Decision Resources Group, London, United Kingdom.

Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Aug;26(8):1027-1038. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19319. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2020.19319
PMID:32308099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10391130/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic progressive inflammatory condition associated with significant direct and indirect costs. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of PsA. Economic evaluations, alongside clinical data, help inform papers and formulary decisions in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes and costs of including tofacitinib in treatment strategies for PsA from a third-party U.S. payer perspective, using a health economic model.

METHODS

A decision tree model was developed to evaluate treatment sequences (up to 4 lines of advanced PsA therapy) with or without tofacitinib. Patients included in the model had active PsA and a previous inadequate response (IR) to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) or tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapy. The analysis time horizon was 2 years; decision points for continuing/switching treatments occurred quarterly, based on clinical response (assessed using the primary rheumatoid measure of efficacy, American College of Rheumatology [ACR]20 response only) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Costs included those related to ADRs and drug acquisition, monitoring, and administration. Other endpoints of PsA, such as assessment of enthesitis and dactylitis, were not integrated into the model.

RESULTS

Treatment strategies including tofacitinib were associated with cost savings versus strategies without tofacitinib across all modeled scenarios, with an estimated 2-year cost saving of up to $8,454,858, based on 1 million insurants. Similarly, costs per member per month and per ACR20 responder were lower for sequences including tofacitinib versus sequences without. These savings arose because of lower ADR and drug acquisition/administration costs for sequences including tofacitinib. Deterministic sensitivity analyses showed these results to be robust.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that including tofacitinib in the treatment of active PsA in csDMARD-IR or TNFi-IR patients is a cost-saving alternative to sequences without tofacitinib, potentially reducing costs for PsA advanced therapies by up to $8.4 million over 2 years for payers insuring 1 million individuals.

DISCLOSURES

This work was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Bungey is an employee of Decision Resources Group, which received financial support from Pfizer Inc to develop the treatment-cost model used in the development of this manuscript. Chang-Douglass was an employee of Decision Resources Group at the time of the analysis. During development of this publication, Chang-Douglass started a role at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The publication only reflects her views and does not reflect the views of NICE. Hsu, Cappelleri, Young, and Woolcott are employees of Pfizer Inc and own stock or stock options in Pfizer Inc. The data reported in this manuscript have been previously presented at the American College of Rheumatology Annual Scientific Meeting; October 19-24, 2018; Chicago, IL, and the AMCP Annual Meeting and Expo; March 25-28, 2019; San Diego, CA.

摘要

背景

银屑病关节炎(PsA)是一种慢性进行性炎症性疾病,与巨大的直接和间接成本相关。托法替布是一种用于治疗 PsA 的口服 Janus 激酶抑制剂。经济学评价与临床数据共同为美国的论文和处方集决策提供信息。

目的

从美国第三方支付者的角度,通过健康经济学模型,评估将托法替布纳入 PsA 治疗方案的结果和成本。

方法

开发了一个决策树模型,以评估有无托法替布的治疗方案(最多 4 线高级 PsA 治疗)。纳入模型的患者患有活动性 PsA 且先前对传统合成改善病情抗风湿药(csDMARD)或肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗应答不足(IR)。分析时间范围为 2 年;根据临床应答(仅使用美国风湿病学会 [ACR]20 应答的主要类风湿疗效指标评估)和药物不良反应(ADR),每季度进行一次继续/转换治疗的决策点。成本包括与 ADR 和药物获取、监测及管理相关的成本。模型未纳入其他 PsA 结局,如附着点炎和指(趾)炎的评估。

结果

与不包含托法替布的方案相比,所有模型情景中包含托法替布的治疗方案均具有成本节约,基于 100 万被保险人,2 年的预计成本节约高达 845.4858 万美元。同样,包含托法替布的方案中,每个成员每月和每个 ACR20 应答者的成本也更低。这些节约源于包含托法替布的方案中 ADR 和药物获取/管理成本更低。确定性敏感性分析表明,这些结果是稳健的。

结论

该分析表明,对于 csDMARD-IR 或 TNFi-IR 患者的活动性 PsA,包含托法替布的治疗方案是一种比不包含托法替布的方案更具成本效益的替代方案,在 2 年内,支付者为 100 万个人承保,包含托法替布的方案可使 PsA 高级治疗方案的成本降低高达 840 万美元。

披露

本项工作由辉瑞公司赞助。Bungey 是 Decision Resources Group 的员工,Decision Resources Group 从辉瑞公司获得了开发用于本研究手稿的治疗成本模型的资金支持。Chang-Douglass 在进行分析时是 Decision Resources Group 的员工。在本出版物的开发过程中,Chang-Douglass 开始在英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)任职。该出版物仅反映了她的观点,并不反映 NICE 的观点。Hsu、Cappelleri、Young 和 Woolcott 是辉瑞公司的员工,拥有辉瑞公司的股票或股票期权。本研究报告中报告的数据此前已在 2018 年 10 月 19-24 日在芝加哥举行的美国风湿病学会年度科学会议和 2019 年 3 月 25-28 日在圣地亚哥举行的 AMCP 年会和博览会上展示。

相似文献

1
Costs and Health Outcomes Associated with Tofacitinib Treatment for Active Psoriatic Arthritis in the United States.在美国,托法替尼治疗活动性银屑病关节炎的成本与健康结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Aug;26(8):1027-1038. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19319. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
2
An Economic Evaluation of Tofacitinib Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate or After 1 or 2 TNF Inhibitors from a U.S. Payer Perspective.从美国支付者角度评估托法替布治疗甲氨蝶呤或 1 或 2 种 TNF 抑制剂后类风湿关节炎的经济学评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Oct;24(10):1010-1017. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.17220. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
3
An Economic Evaluation of Tofacitinib Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Modeling the Cost of Treatment Strategies in the United States.托法替布治疗类风湿关节炎的经济学评价:美国治疗策略成本建模。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Sep;22(9):1088-102. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.9.1088.
4
Cost-effectiveness of Tofacitinib in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in South Korea.托法替布治疗韩国中重度类风湿关节炎的成本效益
Clin Ther. 2015 Aug;37(8):1662-76.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
5
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the United States.在美模拟托法替布治疗类风湿关节炎的成本效益。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Nov;34(11):1991-2000. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1497957. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
6
A Budget Impact and Cost Per Additional Responder Analysis for Baricitinib for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with an Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in the USA.巴瑞替尼治疗美国肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂应答不足的中重度类风湿关节炎患者的预算影响和每增加 1 例应答者的成本分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Jan;38(1):39-56. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00829-x.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Sarilumab Added to Methotrexate in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors.沙利鲁单抗联合甲氨蝶呤治疗对肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂应答不足或不耐受的中重度活跃类风湿关节炎成年患者的成本-效果分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Nov;25(11):1268-1280. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.11.1268.
8
Budget impact of introducing tofacitinib to the public hospital formulary in Hong Kong, 2017-2021.2017-2021 年托法替布纳入香港公立医院药物名册的预算影响。
Hong Kong Med J. 2019 Jun;25(3):201-208. doi: 10.12809/hkmj187673. Epub 2019 May 29.
9
Tofacitinib for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis After the Failure of Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.托法替布治疗疾病修饰抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:NICE 单技术评估的循证评价组观点。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Sep;36(9):1063-1072. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0639-0.
10
Adherence, Persistence, Healthcare Resource Use, and Costs in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Data from Two United States Claims Databases.托法替布治疗银屑病关节炎患者的依从性、持久性、医疗资源利用和成本:来自两个美国索赔数据库的数据。
Adv Ther. 2024 Oct;41(10):3850-3867. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02904-y. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Review on Novel Oral Therapies for Psoriasis.银屑病新型口服疗法综述
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2021 Dec;14(12):55-63.

本文引用的文献

1
Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.特稿:2018 年美国风湿病学会/国家银屑病基金会银屑病关节炎治疗指南。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jan;71(1):2-29. doi: 10.1002/acr.23789. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
2
Drug survival rates of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and Janus kinase-inhibitor therapy in 801 rheumatoid arthritis patients: a 14 year-retrospective study from a rheumatology clinic in Japan.801 例类风湿关节炎患者的生物改善病情抗风湿药物和 Janus 激酶抑制剂治疗的药物生存率:来自日本风湿病诊所的 14 年回顾性研究。
Mod Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;29(6):928-935. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1537556. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
3
Trends in the Prevalence and Incidence of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Study.加拿大安大略省银屑病和银屑病关节炎的患病率和发病率趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Aug;71(8):1084-1091. doi: 10.1002/acr.23743. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
4
Direct healthcare costs and comorbidity burden among patients with psoriatic arthritis in the USA.美国银屑病关节炎患者的直接医疗成本和合并症负担。
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Oct;37(10):2751-2761. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4187-y. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
5
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the United States.在美模拟托法替布治疗类风湿关节炎的成本效益。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Nov;34(11):1991-2000. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1497957. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
6
An Economic Evaluation of Tofacitinib Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate or After 1 or 2 TNF Inhibitors from a U.S. Payer Perspective.从美国支付者角度评估托法替布治疗甲氨蝶呤或 1 或 2 种 TNF 抑制剂后类风湿关节炎的经济学评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Oct;24(10):1010-1017. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.17220. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
7
Apremilast monotherapy in DMARD-naive psoriatic arthritis patients: results of the randomized, placebo-controlled PALACE 4 trial.在未使用过改善病情抗风湿药的银屑病关节炎患者中阿普司特单药治疗:随机、安慰剂对照的PALACE 4试验结果
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Jul 1;57(7):1253-1263. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key032.
8
Drug retention and discontinuation reasons between seven biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis -The ANSWER cohort study.类风湿关节炎患者七种生物制剂的药物保留和停药原因 - ANSWER 队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194130. eCollection 2018.
9
Long-term persistence of TNF-inhibitor treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register.银屑病关节炎患者中肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的长期持续治疗。来自英国风湿病学会生物制剂登记处的数据。
RMD Open. 2018 Jan 7;4(1):e000596. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000596. eCollection 2018.
10
Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review.治疗银屑病关节炎的成本和成本效益:系统文献回顾。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 May;36(5):567-589. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0618-5.