• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格鲁吉亚的孕产妇死亡率:发病率、原因及报告不足程度:2014年全国生育年龄死亡率研究

Maternal Mortality in Georgia: Incidence, Causes and Level of Underreporting: A National Reproductive Age Mortality Study 2014.

作者信息

Berdzuli Nino, Lomia Nino, Staff Anne Cathrine, Kereselidze Maia, Lazdane Gunta, Jacobsen Anne Flem

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2020 Apr 9;12:277-286. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S227349. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S227349
PMID:32308502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7154943/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Accurate data on maternal mortality are essential for assessing progress towards Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).The aim of the study was to determine the incidence and causes of maternal deaths in Georgia, then explore the potential for improvement of quality of maternal health care. The study's secondary aims were to identify the level of underreporting of maternal deaths in Georgian vital statistics over 1 year (2012) and to compare these results with previous data from 2006. The study findings allow to support the country in developing evidence-based policies and tracking progress towards meeting SDG targets.

METHODS

A national Reproductive Age Mortality Survey (RAMOS) was conducted in Georgia in 2014-15. Multiple data sources were used to identify deaths of women aged 15-49 years between January and December 2012. All deaths in women of reproductive age were investigated through verbal autopsy (VA) diagnoses. Deaths in women during pregnancy or one-year postpartum were further investigated by conducting interviews and medical record reviews at the last medical facility which provided health care for the woman during her fatal condition. A specialist panel reviewed these cases and assigned underlining causes of deaths.

RESULTS

We found that 98% of deaths among women of reproductive age were registered by Georgia's civil registration and vital statistics system (CRVS). A total of 918 deaths met the study inclusion criteria. Thirty-six (4.1%) women died during pregnancy or within one-year postpartum. Among these 36 deaths, 23 (63.8%) were maternal deaths, 15 early (either during pregnancy or 42 days postpartum) and eight late (43-365 days postpartum) deaths (65.2% vs 34.8%). The remaining 13 of 36 deaths were coincidental deaths. Fourteen maternal deaths were reported by official statistics and nine deaths were not included in these statistics. Thus, the underreporting rate was 39%. Direct obstetric causes accounted for 73.9% (n=17) of maternal deaths, whereas 26.1% (n=6) were indirect. The leading causes of direct maternal deaths were infection (21.7%), hemorrhage (17.4%), pulmonary embolism (13.0%), and pregnancy-induced hypertension (8.7%). The RAMOS study calculated a maternal mortality ratio (early maternal deaths) of 26.3 per 100,000 live births compared with the official figure of 22.8 per 100,000 live births.

DISCUSSIONS

Registration of early maternal deaths significantly improved since last survey in 2008, while indirect and late maternal deaths continue to be unrecognized, as reflected in official Georgian statistics. The difference between RAMOS study findings and officially reported maternal mortality rates is minimal, showing improvements in detection of maternal deaths by the national maternal mortality surveillance system. The greatest number of direct obstetric deaths occur in the first week postpartum, which likely reflects deficiencies in quality of care.

摘要

引言

准确的孕产妇死亡率数据对于评估可持续发展目标(SDG)的进展至关重要。本研究的目的是确定格鲁吉亚孕产妇死亡的发生率和原因,进而探索改善孕产妇保健质量的潜力。该研究的次要目的是确定格鲁吉亚生命统计数据中1年(2012年)内孕产妇死亡漏报的程度,并将这些结果与2006年的先前数据进行比较。研究结果有助于支持该国制定循证政策并跟踪实现可持续发展目标指标的进展情况。

方法

2014年至2015年在格鲁吉亚进行了一项全国生殖年龄死亡率调查(RAMOS)。使用了多个数据源来识别2012年1月至12月期间15至49岁女性的死亡情况。通过口头尸检(VA)诊断对所有育龄妇女的死亡进行了调查。对怀孕或产后一年内死亡的妇女,在其病情危急时为其提供医疗服务的最后一家医疗机构进行访谈和病历审查,作进一步调查。一个专家小组对这些病例进行了审查,并确定了死亡的根本原因。

结果

我们发现,格鲁吉亚的民事登记和生命统计系统(CRVS)登记了98%的育龄妇女死亡情况。共有918例死亡符合研究纳入标准。36名(4.1%)妇女在怀孕期间或产后一年内死亡。在这36例死亡中,23例(63.8%)为孕产妇死亡,其中15例为早期死亡(孕期或产后42天内),8例为晚期死亡(产后43 - 365天)(65.2%对34.8%)。36例死亡中的其余13例为偶合死亡。官方统计报告了14例孕产妇死亡,另有9例死亡未纳入这些统计数据。因此,漏报率为39%。直接产科原因占孕产妇死亡的73.9%(n = 17),而间接原因占26.1%(n = 6)。直接孕产妇死亡的主要原因是感染(21.7%)、出血(17.4%)、肺栓塞(13.0%)和妊娠高血压(8.7%)。RAMOS研究计算出的孕产妇死亡率(早期孕产妇死亡)为每10万活产26.3例,而官方数字为每10万活产22.8例。

讨论

自2008年上次调查以来,早期孕产妇死亡的登记情况有了显著改善,但格鲁吉亚官方统计数据显示,间接和晚期孕产妇死亡仍未得到确认。RAMOS研究结果与官方报告的孕产妇死亡率之间的差异很小,表明国家孕产妇死亡率监测系统在孕产妇死亡检测方面有所改进。最大数量的直接产科死亡发生在产后第一周,这可能反映了护理质量的不足。

相似文献

1
Maternal Mortality in Georgia: Incidence, Causes and Level of Underreporting: A National Reproductive Age Mortality Study 2014.格鲁吉亚的孕产妇死亡率:发病率、原因及报告不足程度:2014年全国生育年龄死亡率研究
Int J Womens Health. 2020 Apr 9;12:277-286. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S227349. eCollection 2020.
2
Audit of Early and Late Maternal Deaths in Georgia: Potential for Improving Substandard Obstetric Care.佐治亚州孕产妇早晚期死亡情况审计:改善不合格产科护理的潜力
Int J Womens Health. 2021 Feb 17;13:205-219. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S288763. eCollection 2021.
3
Underreporting and misclassification of maternal mortality in Taiwan.台湾地区孕产妇死亡报告不足与错误分类情况
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997 Aug;76(7):629-36. doi: 10.3109/00016349709024602.
4
Levels and Causes of Maternal Mortality and Morbidity孕产妇死亡率和发病率的水平及原因
5
CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005-2013.美国疾病控制与预防中心国家健康报告:2005 - 2013年美国发病和死亡的主要原因以及相关行为风险和保护因素
MMWR Suppl. 2014 Oct 31;63(4):3-27.
6
Characteristics of Maternal Mortality Missed by Vital Statistics in Hong Kong, 2000-2019.2000-2019 年香港生命统计数据漏报的孕产妇死亡特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230429. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0429.
7
Maternal mortality audit in Suriname between 2010 and 2014, a reproductive age mortality survey.苏里南 2010 年至 2014 年孕产妇死亡率审计,育龄妇女死亡调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1466-6.
8
Maternal mortality in the United States: are the high and rising rates due to changes in obstetrical factors, maternal medical conditions, or maternal mortality surveillance?美国的孕产妇死亡率:如此之高且不断上升的比率是由于产科因素、产妇医疗状况还是孕产妇死亡率监测的变化所致?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Apr;230(4):440.e1-440.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.038. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
9
Obstetric deaths in Menoufia Governorate, Egypt.埃及米努夫省的产科死亡情况。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Jan;96(1):9-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb01569.x.
10
Maternal mortality in Giza, Egypt: magnitude, causes, and prevention.埃及吉萨省的孕产妇死亡率:规模、原因及预防
Stud Fam Plann. 1992 Jan-Feb;23(1):45-57.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal pulmonary hypertension and cardiopulmonary outcomes during delivery hospitalization in the United States: A nationwide study from 2016-2020.美国分娩住院期间的孕产妇肺动脉高压及心肺结局:一项2016 - 2020年的全国性研究
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2024 Dec;38:101170. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101170. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
Incompleteness and misclassification of maternal death recording: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孕产妇死亡记录的不完整性和分类错误:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov 15;23(1):794. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06077-4.
3
Maternal mortality in eight European countries with enhanced surveillance systems: descriptive population based study.

本文引用的文献

1
MBRRACE-UK Report launch December 2016.英国孕产妇和儿童健康保密调查(MBRRACE-UK)报告于2016年12月发布。
Pract Midwife. 2017 Feb;20(2):30-2.
2
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children.剖宫产术对母婴健康的短期和长期影响。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.
3
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
八个强化监测系统的欧洲国家的孕产妇死亡率:描述性基于人群的研究。
BMJ. 2022 Nov 16;379:e070621. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070621.
4
Audit of Early and Late Maternal Deaths in Georgia: Potential for Improving Substandard Obstetric Care.佐治亚州孕产妇早晚期死亡情况审计:改善不合格产科护理的潜力
Int J Womens Health. 2021 Feb 17;13:205-219. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S288763. eCollection 2021.
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
4
Georgia: Health System Review.佐治亚州:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2017 Jul;19(4):1-90.
5
A maternal death from self-induced medical abortion: a call for action.一例因自行堕胎导致的孕产妇死亡:呼吁采取行动。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017 Oct;22(5):393-395. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1390080. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
6
Maternal deaths in the Nordic countries.北欧国家的孕产妇死亡情况。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Sep;96(9):1112-1119. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13172. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
7
Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting.影响产前、围产期和儿科死后检查接受率的因素。
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(2):172-181. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14600. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
8
Measuring maternal mortality: a systematic review of methods used to obtain estimates of the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) in low- and middle-income countries.衡量孕产妇死亡率:对用于获取低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇死亡率(MMR)估计值的方法的系统评价
Br Med Bull. 2017 Jan 1;121(1):121-134. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw056.
9
Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality.剖宫产率与母婴死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2263-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15553.
10
Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences.意大利女性更喜欢剖宫产吗?一项关于分娩方式偏好的调查结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Mar 26;13:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-78.