Suppr超能文献

脊柱外科医生如何看待用于术后并发症风险评分的因素的影响?

How Do Spinal Surgeons Perceive The Impact of Factors Used in Post-Surgical Complication Risk Scores?

作者信息

Parimbelli Enea, Szymon Wilk, O'Sullivan Dympna, Kingwell Stephen, Michalowski Wojtek, Michalowski Martin

机构信息

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:699-706. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

When deciding about surgical treatment options, an important aspect of the decision-making process is the potential risk of complications. A risk assessment performed by a spinal surgeon is based on their knowledge of the best available evidence and on their own clinical experience. The objective of this work is to demonstrate the differences in the way spine surgeons perceive the importance of attributes used to calculate risk of post-operative and quantify the differences by building individual formal models of risk perceptions. We employ a preference-learning method - ROR-UTADIS - to build surgeon-specific additive value functions for risk of complications. Comparing these functions enables the identification and discussion of differences among personal perceptions of risk factors. Our results show there exist differences in surgeons' perceived factors including primary diagnosis, type of surgery, patient's age, body mass index, or presence of comorbidities.

摘要

在决定手术治疗方案时,决策过程中的一个重要方面是并发症的潜在风险。脊柱外科医生进行的风险评估基于他们对现有最佳证据的了解以及自身的临床经验。这项工作的目的是通过构建个体风险认知的正式模型,展示脊柱外科医生在看待用于计算术后风险的属性的重要性方面的差异,并量化这些差异。我们采用一种偏好学习方法——ROR-UTADIS——来构建针对外科医生的并发症风险附加价值函数。比较这些函数能够识别并讨论个人对风险因素认知的差异。我们的结果表明,外科医生所认知的因素存在差异,包括原发性诊断、手术类型、患者年龄、体重指数或合并症的存在情况。

相似文献

8
An assessment of data and methodology of online surgeon scorecards.在线外科医生记分卡的数据与方法评估。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):235-242. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.SPINE16183. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

2
Spine Surgeon Treatment Variability: The Impact on Costs.脊柱外科医生的治疗差异:对成本的影响。
Global Spine J. 2018 Aug;8(5):498-506. doi: 10.1177/2192568217739610. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
10
Is There a Consensus when Physicians Evaluate the Relevance of Retrieved Systematic Reviews?
Methods Inf Med. 2016 May 17;55(3):292-8. doi: 10.3414/ME15-01-0131. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验