Leong Joon Yau, Wessner Corinne E, Kramer Michael R, Forsberg Flemming, Halpern Ethan J, Lyshchik Andrej, Torkzaban Mehnoosh, Morris Andrew, Byrne Kelly, VanMeter Maris, Trabulsi Edouard J, Lallas Costas D, Eisenbrey John R
Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Oct;39(10):1947-1955. doi: 10.1002/jum.15299. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
Vascular assessment of indeterminate renal masses (iRMs) remains a crucial element of diagnostic imaging, as the presence of blood flow within renal lesions suggests malignancy. We compared the utility of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI; Canon Medical Systems, Tustin, CA), a novel Doppler technique, to standard color Doppler imaging (CDI) and power Doppler imaging (PDI) for the detection of vascularity within iRMs.
Patients undergoing contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) evaluations for iRMs first underwent a renal ultrasound examination with the following modes: CDI, PDI, color Superb Microvascular Imaging (cSMI), and monochrome Superb Microvascular Imaging (mSMI), using an Aplio i800 scanner with an i8CX1 transducer (Canon Medical Systems). After image randomization, each mode was assessed for iRM vascularity by 4 blinded readers on a diagnostic confidence scale of 1 to 5 (5 = most confident). The results were compared to CEUS as the reference standard.
Forty-one patients with 50 lesions met inclusion criteria. Relative to the other 3 modalities, mSMI had the highest sensitivity (63.3%), whereas cSMI had the highest specificity (62.1%). Both cSMI and mSMI also had the highest diagnostic accuracy (0.678 and 0.680, respectively; both P < 0.001) compared to CDI (0.568) and PDI (0.555). Although the reader-reported confidence interval of mSMI (mean ± SD, 3.6 ± 1.1) was significantly lower than CDI (4.1 ± 1.0) and PDI (4.0 ± 1.0; P < 0.001), the confidence level of cSMI (4.1 ± 0.9) was not (P > 0.173).
Preliminary data suggest that SMI is a potentially useful modality in detecting microvasculature in iRMs compared to standard Doppler techniques. Future studies should aim to compare the efficacy of both SMI and CEUS and to assess the ability of SMI to characterize malignancy in iRMs.
对不确定肾肿块(iRMs)进行血管评估仍是诊断性成像的关键要素,因为肾病变内血流的存在提示恶性肿瘤。我们比较了一种新型多普勒技术——超微血管成像(SMI;佳能医疗系统公司,加利福尼亚州图斯廷)与标准彩色多普勒成像(CDI)和能量多普勒成像(PDI)在检测iRMs内血管方面的效用。
接受iRMs对比增强超声(CEUS)评估的患者首先使用配备i8CX1探头的Aplio i800扫描仪(佳能医疗系统公司),通过以下模式进行肾脏超声检查:CDI、PDI、彩色超微血管成像(cSMI)和单色超微血管成像(mSMI)。图像随机化后,4名盲法阅片者以1至5分的诊断置信度评分(5分表示最有信心)对每种模式的iRM血管情况进行评估。将结果与作为参考标准的CEUS进行比较。
41例患者的50个病灶符合纳入标准。相对于其他3种模式,mSMI的敏感性最高(63.3%),而cSMI的特异性最高(62.1%)。与CDI(0.568)和PDI(0.555)相比,cSMI和mSMI的诊断准确性也最高(分别为0.678和0.680;P均<0.001)。尽管阅片者报告的mSMI置信区间(均值±标准差,3.6±1.1)显著低于CDI(4.1±1.0)和PDI(4.0±1.0;P<0.001),但cSMI的置信度(4.1±0.9)并非如此(P>0.173)。
初步数据表明,与标准多普勒技术相比,SMI在检测iRMs中的微血管方面可能是一种有用的模式。未来的研究应旨在比较SMI和CEUS的疗效,并评估SMI对iRMs中恶性肿瘤的特征化能力。