• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“剥夺和威胁的维度、精神病理学以及潜在的中介因素:一项多年纵向分析”:米勒等人(2018 年)的更正。

"Dimensions of deprivation and threat, psychopathology, and potential mediators: A multi-year longitudinal analysis": Correction to Miller et al. (2018).

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 May;129(4):363. doi: 10.1037/abn0000529.

DOI:10.1037/abn0000529
PMID:32309983
Abstract

Reports an error in "Dimensions of deprivation and threat, psychopathology, and potential mediators: A multi-year longitudinal analysis" by Adam Bryant Miller, Margaret A. Sheridan, Jamie L. Hanson, Katie A. McLaughlin, John E. Bates, Jennifer E. Lansford, Gregory S. Pettit and Kenneth A. Dodge (, 2018[Feb], Vol 127[2], 160-170). In the article, the indirect effects in the Path Analysis Model section of the Results (i.e., in paragraph 3 of the Model 1 subsection and paragraphs 1-4 of the Alternative models subsection) are incorrectly reported as standardized βs and should have been represented by βs for unstandardized indirect effects. Nevertheless, the pattern of results remains unchanged, and the standardized indirect effects are significant. Additional minor corrections to standardized βs for direct paths are as follows: In paragraph 1 of the Alternative models subsection, "β = 0.40" should read "β = 0.50." In paragraph 4 of the Alternative models subsection, "β = 0.05," "β = 0.12," and "β = 0.002, = .97" should read " β = 0.12," "β = 0.09," and "β = 0.3, = .70," respectively. Finally, the corresponding author's e-mail address is incorrect and should read adam.miller@unc.edu. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2018-09964-003.) Prior research demonstrates a link between exposure to childhood adversity and psychopathology later in development. However, work on mechanisms linking adversity to psychopathology fails to account for specificity in these pathways across different types of adversity. Here, we test a conceptual model that distinguishes deprivation and threat as distinct forms of childhood adversity with different pathways to psychopathology. Deprivation involves an absence of inputs from the environment, such as cognitive and social stimulation, that influence psychopathology by altering cognitive development, such as verbal abilities. Threat includes experiences involving harm or threat of harm that increase risk for psychopathology through disruptions in social-emotional processing. We test the prediction that deprivation, but not threat, increases risk for psychopathology through altered verbal abilities. Data were drawn from the Child Development Project (N = 585), which followed children for over a decade. We analyze data from assessment points at age 5, 6, 14, and 17 years. Mothers completed interviews at age 5 and 6 on exposure to threat and deprivation experiences. Youth verbal abilities were assessed at age 14. At age 17, mothers reported on child psychopathology. A path analysis model tested longitudinal paths to internalizing and externalizing problems from experiences of deprivation and threat. Consistent with predictions, deprivation was associated with risk for externalizing problems via effects on verbal abilities at age 14. Threat was associated longitudinally with both internalizing and externalizing problems, but these effects were not mediated by verbal abilities. Results suggest that unique developmental mechanisms link different forms of adversity with psychopathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

报告了 Adam Bryant Miller、Margaret A. Sheridan、Jamie L. Hanson、Katie A. McLaughlin、John E. Bates、Jennifer E. Lansford、Gregory S. Pettit 和 Kenneth A. Dodge 发表的“剥夺和威胁的维度、精神病理学和潜在的中介因素:多年纵向分析”(2018[2 月],第 127 卷,第 160-170 页)中的错误。在文章中,结果中的路径分析模型部分的间接效应(即模型 1 小节的第 3 段和替代模型小节的第 1-4 段)被错误地报告为标准化 β,而应该表示为未标准化间接效应的 β。尽管如此,结果模式保持不变,标准化间接效应仍然显著。对直接路径的标准化 β 的其他一些小修正如下:替代模型小节的第 1 段中,“β=0.40”应改为“β=0.50”。替代模型小节的第 4 段中,“β=0.05”“β=0.12”和“β=0.002,=0.97”应分别改为“β=0.12”“β=0.09”和“β=0.3,=0.70”。最后,通讯作者的电子邮件地址不正确,应改为 adam.miller@unc.edu。(原始文章的摘要如下:[记录 2018-09964-003]先前的研究表明,儿童期逆境暴露与日后发展中的精神病理学之间存在联系。然而,将逆境与精神病理学联系起来的工作未能解释不同类型逆境在这些途径中的特异性。在这里,我们测试了一个概念模型,该模型将剥夺和威胁区分成不同的童年逆境形式,它们具有不同的通向精神病理学的途径。剥夺涉及环境输入的缺失,例如认知和社会刺激,这些输入通过改变认知发展(如语言能力)来影响精神病理学。威胁包括涉及伤害或伤害威胁的经历,这些经历通过破坏社会情感处理过程而增加精神病理学的风险。我们预测,剥夺而不是威胁,会通过改变语言能力来增加精神病理学的风险。数据来自儿童发展项目(N=585),该项目对儿童进行了十多年的跟踪研究。我们分析了从 5 岁、6 岁、14 岁和 17 岁评估点收集的数据。母亲在 5 岁和 6 岁时完成了关于威胁和剥夺经历的访谈。青少年的语言能力在 14 岁时进行评估。在 17 岁时,母亲报告了儿童的精神病理学情况。路径分析模型测试了从剥夺和威胁经历到内化和外化问题的纵向路径。与预测一致,剥夺与外化问题的风险相关,这是通过 14 岁时的语言能力产生的影响。威胁与内化和外化问题均呈纵向相关,但这些影响不受语言能力的影响。结果表明,独特的发展机制将不同形式的逆境与精神病理学联系起来。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
"Dimensions of deprivation and threat, psychopathology, and potential mediators: A multi-year longitudinal analysis": Correction to Miller et al. (2018).“剥夺和威胁的维度、精神病理学以及潜在的中介因素:一项多年纵向分析”:米勒等人(2018 年)的更正。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 May;129(4):363. doi: 10.1037/abn0000529.
2
Dimensions of deprivation and threat, psychopathology, and potential mediators: A multi-year longitudinal analysis.剥夺与威胁维度、精神病理学及潜在中介因素:一项多年纵向分析。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Feb;127(2):160-170. doi: 10.1037/abn0000331.
3
Deprivation and psychopathology in the Fragile Families Study: A 15-year longitudinal investigation.脆弱家庭研究中的剥夺与精神病理学:一项为期 15 年的纵向研究。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;62(4):382-391. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13260. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
Do dimensions of childhood adversity differ in their direct associations with youth psychopathology? A meta-analysis.童年逆境的维度与青少年精神病理学的直接关联是否存在差异?一项荟萃分析。
Dev Psychopathol. 2025 May;37(2):871-901. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424000737. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
5
Threat and deprivation are associated with distinct aspects of cognition, emotional processing, and psychopathology in children and adolescents.威胁和剥夺与儿童和青少年认知、情绪处理和精神病理学的不同方面有关。
Dev Sci. 2023 Jan;26(1):e13267. doi: 10.1111/desc.13267. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
Dimensions of Adversity, Physiological Reactivity, and Externalizing Psychopathology in Adolescence: Deprivation and Threat.青少年逆境的维度、生理反应与外化性精神病理学:剥夺与威胁
Psychosom Med. 2017 Feb/Mar;79(2):162-171. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000369.
7
Testing Deprivation and Threat: A Preregistered Network Analysis of the Dimensions of Early Adversity.测试剥夺和威胁:早期逆境维度的预先注册网络分析。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Oct;33(10):1753-1766. doi: 10.1177/09567976221101045. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
8
Pubertal timing mediates the association between threat adversity and psychopathology.青春期发育时间介导了威胁性逆境与精神病理学之间的关联。
Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 26;54(12):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S003329172400179X.
9
Differential Associations of Deprivation and Threat With Cognitive Control and Fear Conditioning in Early Childhood.童年早期贫困与威胁对认知控制和恐惧条件作用的差异关联
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 May 8;13:80. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00080. eCollection 2019.
10
Deprivation and threat, emotion dysregulation, and psychopathology: Concurrent and longitudinal associations.剥夺与威胁、情绪失调与精神病理学:并发与纵向关联。
Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Aug;31(3):847-857. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000294. Epub 2019 Apr 24.