Shaul Michelle, Whittle Sarah, Silk Timothy J, Vijayakumar Nandita
School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 26;54(12):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S003329172400179X.
Exposure to adversity in childhood is a risk factor for lifetime mental health problems. Altered pace of biological aging, as measured through pubertal timing, is one potential explanatory pathway for this risk. This study examined whether pubertal timing mediated the association between adversity (threat and deprivation) and adolescent mental health problems (internalizing and externalizing), and whether this was moderated by sex.
Aims were examined using the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development study, a large community sample from the United States. Data were used from three timepoints across the ages of 9-14 years. Latent scores from confirmatory factor analysis operationalized exposure to threat and deprivation. Bayesian mixed-effects regression models tested whether pubertal timing in early adolescence mediated the relationship between adversity exposure and later internalizing and externalizing problems. Sex was examined as a potential moderator of this pathway.
Both threat and deprivation were associated with later internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Threat, but not deprivation, was associated with earlier pubertal timing, which mediated the association of threat with internalizing and externalizing problems. Sex differences were only observed in the direct association between adversity and internalizing problems, but no such differences were present for mediating pathways.
Adversity exposure had similar associations with the pace of biological aging (as indexed by pubertal timing) and mental health problems in males and females. However, the association of adversity on pubertal timing appears to depend on the dimension of adversity experienced, with only threat conferring risk of earlier pubertal timing.
童年时期暴露于逆境是一生心理健康问题的风险因素。通过青春期发育时间衡量的生物衰老速度改变是这一风险的一种潜在解释途径。本研究考察了青春期发育时间是否介导了逆境(威胁和剥夺)与青少年心理健康问题(内化和外化)之间的关联,以及这是否受到性别的调节。
使用青少年大脑与认知发展研究来检验目标,该研究来自美国的一个大型社区样本。数据来自9至14岁的三个时间点。验证性因素分析得出的潜在分数用于衡量威胁和剥夺的暴露程度。贝叶斯混合效应回归模型检验了青春期早期的发育时间是否介导了逆境暴露与后期内化和外化问题之间的关系。将性别作为该途径的潜在调节因素进行考察。
威胁和剥夺均与后期的内化和外化症状相关。威胁而非剥夺与更早的青春期发育时间相关,这介导了威胁与内化和外化问题之间的关联。仅在逆境与内化问题的直接关联中观察到性别差异,但在介导途径方面不存在此类差异。
男性和女性在逆境暴露与生物衰老速度(以青春期发育时间为指标)及心理健康问题之间存在相似的关联。然而,逆境与青春期发育时间的关联似乎取决于所经历的逆境维度,只有威胁会带来青春期提前的风险。