Suppr超能文献

由新生儿科住院医师进行床边超声检查以确认新生儿中心血管导管位置 - 一项前瞻性诊断评估研究。

Bedside sonography performed by neonatology residents to confirm central vascular catheter position in neonates - A Prospective Diagnostic Evaluation study.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Neonatology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, India.

出版信息

J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2021;14(1):101-107. doi: 10.3233/NPM-200409.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and utility of bedside ultrasound (US) by neonatology residents to confirm position of umbilical venous catheter (UVC), umbilical arterial catheter (UAC), and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC).

METHODS

In this prospective study, we included neonates who required UVC, UAC or PICC insertion. Two neonatology residents performed all bedside US examinations after a short period of training. Plain radiograph was taken as gold standard. Time taken for confirmation of catheter position by US and radiograph was recorded.

RESULTS

We recruited 71 neonates for UVC and UAC, and 40 neonates for PICC. Sensitivity and specificity of US in identifying a malpositioned catheter was good for UVC (94% and 66.7% respectively) and UAC (86.7% and 94.5%). Agreement between radiograph and US was good for UVC [0.718 (0.512, 0.861); p < 0.001] and UAC [0.857 (0.682, 0.953); p < 0.001]. Sensitivity (47.8%) of US in identifying a malpositioned PICC was low, though specificity (82.4%) was good. Agreement between radiograph and US in identifying PICC position was poor [0.25 (-0.084, 0.545); p 0.024]. This was due to incorrect interpretation of catheter position on radiograph in some infants, which was confirmed by the radiologist. The median time taken for US was significantly less than time taken for radiograph in confirming the position of UVC (50 vs. 155 minutes; p < 0.001)), UAC (45 vs. 128 minutes; p < 0.001), and PICC (60 vs. 136 minutes; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

US examination byneonatology residents has good diagnostic accuracy in confirming the position of UAC and UVC, and possibly PICC in neonates. The time taken to confirm catheter position by US is significantly less than radiograph.

摘要

目的

评估新生儿科住院医师进行床边超声(US)检查以确认脐静脉导管(UVC)、脐动脉导管(UAC)和外周静脉置入中心导管(PICC)位置的诊断准确性和实用性。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,我们纳入了需要 UVC、UAC 或 PICC 置管的新生儿。两名新生儿科住院医师在接受短期培训后进行了所有床边 US 检查。X 线片被作为金标准。记录了 US 和 X 线片确认导管位置所花费的时间。

结果

我们共纳入 71 例 UVC 和 UAC 置管以及 40 例 PICC 置管的新生儿。US 检查识别导管错位的敏感性和特异性对 UVC 分别为 94%和 66.7%,对 UAC 分别为 86.7%和 94.5%。UVC[0.718(0.512,0.861);p<0.001]和 UAC[0.857(0.682,0.953);p<0.001]的 X 线片与 US 结果一致性较好。US 检查识别 PICC 错位的敏感性(47.8%)较低,但特异性(82.4%)较好。X 线片与 US 检查识别 PICC 位置的一致性较差[0.25(-0.084,0.545);p=0.024]。这是由于在一些婴儿中,X 线片上对导管位置的不正确解读,这一点被放射科医生所证实。US 检查确认 UVC(50 与 155 分钟;p<0.001)、UAC(45 与 128 分钟;p<0.001)和 PICC(60 与 136 分钟;p<0.001)位置的中位时间明显短于 X 线片。

结论

新生儿科住院医师进行的 US 检查对确认 UAC 和 UVC 导管位置具有良好的诊断准确性,可能对 PICC 也有帮助。US 检查确认导管位置所需的时间明显短于 X 线片。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验