Suppr超能文献

基于出生体重的脐静脉置管深度公式的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of formulae for umbilical venous catheterization depth based on birth weight.

作者信息

Luo Jingjie, Zheng Xu, Yang Zixin, Li Keyue, Chen Lu, Hei Mingyan

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Neonatal Center, Beijing Children's Hospital Capital Medical University National Center for Children's Health Beijing China.

出版信息

Pediatr Investig. 2024 Sep 6;8(4):265-270. doi: 10.1002/ped4.12451. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Umbilical venous catheterization (UVC) is a common procedure for critically ill newborn infants. The insertion depth was estimated before the procedure using various formulae.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of five published formulae based on birth weight (BW).

METHODS

This is a secondary retrospective analysis using data collected in a previous study, in which the actual final insertion depth of UVC was recorded. Predicted insertion depths were calculated by five published formulae based on BW. Then the actual depth and predicted depth were compared. Accurate position was defined as predicted depth being within ± 10% of actual depth. The accuracy rate calculated as "(accurately positioned UVCs/ all UVCs) × 100%" and the ratio of difference calculated as "(|predicted depth - actual depth|/ actual depth)" were compared among five formulae.

RESULTS

Totally 1298 were enrolled, with gestational age 29.8 ± 2.3 weeks and BW 1215 ± 273 g. The accuracy rates were: Tambasco formula (67.2%), Shukla formula (65.0%), JSS formula (64.4%), BW formula (48.9%), and revised Shukla formula (26.9%). Tambasco formula had the highest accuracy rate in newborns with BW ≥ 1000 g. JSS formula had the highest accuracy rate in newborns with BW<1000 g.

INTERPRETATION

It is suggested to use the Tambasco formula for estimating the UVC insertion depth for newborns, especially for those with BW ≥ 1000 g, and to apply the JSS formula for newborns with BW < 1000 g. There is no universal formula for achieving 100% accurate positioning.

摘要

重要性

脐静脉插管术(UVC)是危重新生儿的常见操作。术前使用各种公式估算插入深度。

目的

比较五个已发表的基于出生体重(BW)的公式的准确性。

方法

这是一项二次回顾性分析,使用先前研究中收集的数据,其中记录了UVC的实际最终插入深度。根据BW,通过五个已发表的公式计算预测插入深度。然后比较实际深度和预测深度。准确位置定义为预测深度在实际深度的±10%范围内。比较五个公式的准确率[(准确放置的UVC数/所有UVC数)×100%]和差异率[(|预测深度 - 实际深度|/实际深度)]。

结果

共纳入1298例,胎龄29.8±2.3周,BW 1215±273g。准确率分别为:坦巴斯可公式(67.2%)、舒克拉公式(65.0%)、JSS公式(64.4%)、BW公式(48.9%)和修订的舒克拉公式(26.9%)。坦巴斯可公式在BW≥1000g的新生儿中准确率最高。JSS公式在BW<1000g的新生儿中准确率最高。

解读

建议使用坦巴斯可公式估算新生儿UVC的插入深度,尤其是BW≥1000g的新生儿,对于BW<1000g的新生儿应用JSS公式。不存在能实现100%准确定位的通用公式。

相似文献

3
Accuracy of five formulae to determine the insertion length of umbilical venous catheters.五种公式确定脐静脉导管插入长度的准确性。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Mar;104(2):F165-F169. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314280. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
5
Revised formula to determine the insertion length of umbilical vein catheters.修订版脐静脉导管插入长度计算公式。
Eur J Pediatr. 2013 Aug;172(8):1011-5. doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-1981-z. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
9
Accuracy of 11 formulae to guide umbilical arterial catheter tip placement in newborn infants.11 种公式指导新生儿脐动脉导管尖端位置的准确性。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Jul;103(4):F364-F369. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313039. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 9th Edition.《输液治疗实践标准》第9版
J Infus Nurs. 2024;47(1S Suppl 1):S1-S285. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000532.
3
What is the prevalence of portal vein thrombosis following umbilical venous catheter insertion in very preterm neonates?
Arch Dis Child. 2023 May;108(5):411-413. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-325243. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
8
Cardiac Tamponade - a Cause of Sudden Death in a Premature Newborn.心脏压塞——早产儿猝死的一个原因。
Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2022 Dec;41(6):1057-1059. doi: 10.1080/15513815.2021.2011994. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验