Suppr超能文献

[膝内翻合并股骨冠状面外侧弓形弯曲患者先天性内翻对线的术前规划]

[Preoperative planning of constitutional varus alignment in patients with varus knees and coronal femoral lateral bowing].

作者信息

Guo X Y, Wang Z B, Zhang X, Cheng X W

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Guizhou Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550002, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital Affiliated to the Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 21;100(15):1175-1179. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20190827-01900.

Abstract

To investigate the preoperative constitutional varus alignment (CA) inpatients withvarus osteoarthritic knees and coronal femoral lateral bowing (FLB) by comparing the femoral axis of the patients and volunteers' with straight femoral shaft (SFS) and healthy knees, which would be used to guide the selection of valgus correction angle(VCA) of distal femur in total knee anthroplasty (TKA). From January 2018 to December 2018, 45 nonconsecutive patients (90 knees) with varus osteoarthritic knees and obvious FLB (>5°) received primary TKA,and 50 limbs with healthy knees and SFS in 25 volunteers were studied at Xinqiao Hospital.The medial proximal femoral angle (MPFA) and anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (a-LDFA) were measured and compared between the two groups.The VCA formed by distal femoral mechanical axis (DMA) and distal femoral anatomic axis (DAA) in patients and the VCA based on neutral mechanical axis (NMA) in volunteers were also compared. The Pearson's correlation analysis was performed between the angle of bowing (α) and the VCA based on NMA in patients. The measurement data was compared with test between the two groups. The results showed that the MPFA and the a-LDFA were not significantly different between the volunteers with SFS and patients with FLB (MPFA:84.9°±3.7° vs 85.6°±1.8° and a-LDFA:81.7°±1.7° vs 81.2°±1.6°, 1.26, 1.70, both 0.05). The VCA based on NMA in volunteers with SFS was 5.5°±0.6°(4.5°-7.4°), the preoperative DAA-DMA angle was 5.3°±0.7°(4.3°-7.8°) in patients with FLB, there was no significant difference between the two groups (1.70, 0.09). The angle of bowing (α) was 7.9°±2.9° (6°-16°), the VCA based on NMA was 8.4°±1.5°(5°-10°), there was a significantly positive correlation between VCA and α (=0.607, 0.01). There is no significantly proximal or distal femoral deformity in patients with varus osteoarthritic knee and FLB (>5°), the degree of the DMA-DAAangle based on the DMA doesn't change with the increasing angular deformity of the bowing, then the bowing would be reserved if the distal femur is cut based on DMA in TKA and the preoperative CA should be restored successfully.

摘要

通过比较膝内翻骨关节炎患者和股骨髁冠状面外翻(FLB)患者与股骨干笔直(SFS)且膝关节健康的志愿者的股骨干轴线,来研究术前结构内翻对线(CA)情况,这将用于指导全膝关节置换术(TKA)中股骨远端外翻矫正角度(VCA)的选择。2018年1月至2018年12月,45例非连续性膝内翻骨关节炎且FLB明显(>5°)的患者(90膝)接受了初次TKA,在新桥医院对25名志愿者中50条具有健康膝关节和SFS的肢体进行了研究。测量并比较了两组的股骨近端内侧角(MPFA)和股骨远端外侧解剖角(a-LDFA)。还比较了患者股骨远端机械轴(DMA)和解剖轴(DAA)形成的VCA与基于志愿者中立机械轴(NMA)的VCA。对患者的弯曲角度(α)与基于NMA的VCA进行Pearson相关性分析。两组间测量数据采用t检验进行比较。结果显示,SFS志愿者与FLB患者的MPFA和a-LDFA无显著差异(MPFA:84.9°±3.7°对85.6°±1.8°,a-LDFA:81.7°±1.7°对81.2°±1.6°,t分别为1.26、1.70,均P>0.05)。SFS志愿者基于NMA的VCA为5.5°±0.6°(4.5°-7.4°),FLB患者术前DAA-DMA角为5.3°±0.7°(4.3°-7.8°),两组间无显著差异(t=1.70,P=0.09)。弯曲角度(α)为7.9°±2.9°(6°-16°),基于NMA的VCA为8.4°±1.5°(5°-10°),VCA与α之间存在显著正相关(r=0.607,P<0.01)。膝内翻骨关节炎且FLB(>5°)的患者无明显的股骨近端或远端畸形,基于DMA的DAA-DMA角的度数不会随弯曲角度畸形的增加而改变,那么在TKA中如果基于DMA截骨则弯曲会保留,且术前CA应成功恢复。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验