Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Breach Candy Hospital, and Mullaji Knee Clinic, Mumbai, 400036, India.
Associate Orthopaedic Surgeon, Mullaji Knee Clinic, Mumbai, 400036, India.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2793-2805. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06676-8. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
Recommendations for resecting distal femur and proximal tibia in mechanical and anatomical alignment techniques are standardized. Kinematic alignment propagates individualizing resection planes. Whether significant variation exists, to warrant departure from standardized resection planes, has not been shown thus far in a large cohort of knees and with a wide range of varus deformity. The null hypothesis of this study was that there was no phenotypic variation in varus osteoarthritic knees. The aim of this paper was to determine whether distinct phenotypes could be identified, based on variations in coronal femoral and tibial morphology, which could aid in surgical planning and categorizing varus knees for future studies.
2129 full-leg weightbearing radiographs were analyzed (1704 preoperative; 425 of contralateral arthritic knee). Measurements made were of HKA (hip-knee-ankle angle), VCA (valgus correction angle), mLDFA (lateral mechanical distal femoral angle), aLDFA (lateral anatomical distal femoral angle), MPTA (medial proximal tibial angle), MNSA (medial neck shaft angle), TAMA (angle between tibial mechanical and anatomical axes), and TPDR (percentage length of tibia proximal to extra-articular deformity).
Seven distinct types were identified covering 2021 knees, reducible to 4 broad phenotypes: 11% were Type 1 'Neutral' knees showing values close to reported normal knees (mean VCA 5.5°, mLDFA 87°, aLDFA 81°). 38% were Type 2 'Intra-articular varus' with medial intra-articular bone loss (mean mLDFA 90.9°, MPTA 85.4°, VCA of 5.7°). 41% were Type 3 'Extra-articular varus' with extra-articular deformity (EAD). Type 3a had proximal tibial EAD; Type 3b had tibial diaphyseal EAD; Type 3c had femoral EAD (mean VCA 8.7°, HKA 166°), and severe medial bone loss (mean mLDFA 92°, MPTA 83°). 9% were Type 4 'Valgoid type' with features of valgus knees: Type 4a had medial femoral bowing (mean VCA 2.9°); Type 4b had significant distal femoral valgus (mean mLDFA 85.3°, aLDFA 78.6°).
The null hypothesis that there was no phenotypic variation in varus osteoarthritic knees was rejected as considerable variation was found in coronal morphology of femur and tibia. Four broad phenotypic groups could be identified. Plane of the knee joint articular surface was quite variable. This has relevance to planning and performance of corrective osteotomies, unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty.
III, retrospective cohort study.
在机械和解剖对线技术中,对股骨远端和胫骨近端的切除建议已经标准化。运动对线推广了个体化的切除平面。到目前为止,还没有在大量膝关节和广泛的内翻畸形患者中显示出是否存在显著的变异,需要偏离标准化的切除平面。本研究的零假设是内翻性骨关节炎膝关节没有表型变异。本文的目的是确定是否可以根据股骨和胫骨冠状形态的变化确定不同的表型,这有助于手术规划和为未来的研究对内翻膝关节进行分类。
分析了 2129 例全下肢负重位 X 线片(术前 1704 例;对侧关节炎膝关节 425 例)。测量的指标包括 HKA(髋膝踝角)、VCA(内翻矫正角)、mLDFA(外侧机械股骨远端角)、aLDFA(外侧解剖股骨远端角)、MPTA(内侧胫骨近端角)、MNSA(内侧颈干角)、TAMA(胫骨机械轴和解剖轴之间的角度)和 TPDR(关节外畸形上方胫骨长度的百分比)。
共发现 7 种不同类型,可简化为 4 种主要表型:11%为“中性”1 型膝关节,其值接近报道的正常膝关节(平均 VCA5.5°,mLDFA87°,aLDFA81°)。38%为 2 型“关节内内翻”,存在内侧关节内骨丢失(平均 mLDFA90.9°,MPTA85.4°,VCA5.7°)。41%为 3 型“关节外内翻”伴关节外畸形(EAD)。3a 型有胫骨近端 EAD;3b 型有胫骨骨干 EAD;3c 型有股骨 EAD(平均 VCA8.7°,HKA166°),且存在严重的内侧骨丢失(平均 mLDFA92°,MPTA83°)。9%为 4 型“外翻型”,具有外翻膝关节的特征:4a 型有股骨内侧弯曲(平均 VCA2.9°);4b 型有明显的股骨远端外翻(平均 mLDFA85.3°,aLDFA78.6°)。
由于在股骨和胫骨的冠状形态上发现了相当大的变异,因此内翻性骨关节炎膝关节没有表型变异的零假设被拒绝。可以确定四个主要的表型组。膝关节关节面的平面变化很大。这与矫正截骨术、单髁膝关节置换术和全膝关节置换术的规划和实施有关。
III,回顾性队列研究。