Torné-Noguera Anna, Arnan Xavier, Rodrigo Anselm, Bosch Jordi
CREAF Cerdanyola del Vallès Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Cerdanyola del Vallès Spain.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Mar 4;10(8):3696-3705. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6158. eCollection 2020 Apr.
Species assemblages and their interactions vary through space, generating diversity patterns at different spatial scales. Here, we study the local-scale spatial variation of a cavity-nesting bee and wasp community (hosts), their nest associates (parasitoids), and the resulting antagonistic network over a continuous and homogeneous habitat. To obtain bee/wasp nests, we placed trap-nests at 25 sites over a 32 km area. We obtained 1,541 nests (4,954 cells) belonging to 40 host species and containing 27 parasitoid species. The most abundant host species tended to have higher parasitism rate. Community composition dissimilarity was relatively high for both hosts and parasitoids, and the main component of this variability was species turnover, with a very minor contribution of ordered species loss (nestedness). That is, local species richness tended to be similar across the study area and community composition tended to differ between sites. Interestingly, the spatial matching between host and parasitoid composition was low. Host β-diversity was weakly (positively) but significantly related to geographic distance. On the other hand, parasitoid and host-parasitoid interaction β-diversities were not significantly related to geographic distance. Interaction β-diversity was even higher than host and parasitoid β-diversity, and mostly due to species turnover. Interaction rewiring between plots and between local webs and the regional metaweb was very low. In sum, species composition was rather idiosyncratic to each site causing a relevant mismatch between hosts and parasitoid composition. However, pairs of host and parasitoid species tended to interact similarly wherever they co-occurred. Our results additionally show that interaction β-diversity is better explained by parasitoid than by host β-diversity. We discuss the importance of identifying the sources of variation to understand the drivers of the observed heterogeneity.
物种组合及其相互作用随空间变化,在不同空间尺度上产生多样性格局。在此,我们研究了一个营巢于洞穴的蜜蜂和黄蜂群落(宿主)、它们的巢伴生物(寄生蜂)以及由此形成的拮抗网络在连续且同质栖息地中的局域尺度空间变异。为获取蜜蜂/黄蜂巢穴,我们在32公里区域内的25个地点放置了诱捕巢。我们获得了1541个巢穴(4954个巢室),分属于40个宿主物种,且包含27个寄生蜂物种。最丰富的宿主物种往往具有更高的寄生率。宿主和寄生蜂的群落组成差异都相对较高,这种变异性的主要成分是物种更替,有序物种丧失(嵌套性)的贡献非常小。也就是说,研究区域内局部物种丰富度往往相似,而不同地点的群落组成往往不同。有趣的是,宿主和寄生蜂组成之间的空间匹配度较低。宿主的β多样性与地理距离呈微弱(正)但显著的相关关系。另一方面,寄生蜂以及宿主 - 寄生蜂相互作用的β多样性与地理距离无显著相关关系。相互作用的β多样性甚至高于宿主和寄生蜂的β多样性,且主要归因于物种更替。样地之间以及局部网络与区域元网络之间的相互作用重新连接非常少。总之,物种组成在每个地点都相当独特,导致宿主和寄生蜂组成之间存在明显不匹配。然而,宿主和寄生蜂物种对无论在何处共存,其相互作用往往相似。我们的结果还表明,相互作用的β多样性由寄生蜂比由宿主的β多样性能得到更好的解释。我们讨论了识别变异来源对于理解所观察到的异质性驱动因素的重要性。