Suppr超能文献

互利网络中的地理变异:相似性、更替与伙伴忠诚度。

Geographical variation in mutualistic networks: similarity, turnover and partner fidelity.

作者信息

Trøjelsgaard Kristian, Jordano Pedro, Carstensen Daniel W, Olesen Jens M

机构信息

Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

Integrative Ecology Group, Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 7;282(1802). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2925.

Abstract

Although species and their interactions in unison represent biodiversity and all the ecological and evolutionary processes associated with life, biotic interactions have, contrary to species, rarely been integrated into the concepts of spatial β-diversity. Here, we examine β-diversity of ecological networks by using pollination networks sampled across the Canary Islands. We show that adjacent and distant communities are more and less similar, respectively, in their composition of plants, pollinators and interactions than expected from random distributions. We further show that replacement of species is the major driver of interaction turnover and that this contribution increases with distance. Finally, we quantify that species-specific partner compositions (here called partner fidelity) deviate from random partner use, but vary as a result of ecological and geographical variables. In particular, breakdown of partner fidelity was facilitated by increasing geographical distance, changing abundances and changing linkage levels, but was not related to the geographical distribution of the species. This highlights the importance of space when comparing communities of interacting species and may stimulate a rethinking of the spatial interpretation of interaction networks. Moreover, geographical interaction dynamics and its causes are important in our efforts to anticipate effects of large-scale changes, such as anthropogenic disturbances.

摘要

尽管物种及其相互作用共同构成了生物多样性以及与生命相关的所有生态和进化过程,但与物种不同的是,生物相互作用很少被纳入空间β多样性的概念之中。在此,我们通过使用在加那利群岛采集的传粉网络来研究生态网络的β多样性。我们发现,相邻群落和遥远群落的植物、传粉者及其相互作用的组成分别比随机分布预期的更为相似和更不相似。我们进一步表明,物种替代是相互作用更替的主要驱动因素,且这种作用随着距离的增加而增强。最后,我们量化得出,物种特异性的伙伴组成(这里称为伙伴忠诚度)偏离了随机的伙伴利用情况,但会因生态和地理变量而有所不同。特别是,伙伴忠诚度的瓦解因地理距离增加、丰度变化和连接水平变化而加剧,但与物种的地理分布无关。这凸显了在比较相互作用物种群落时空间的重要性,并可能促使人们重新思考相互作用网络的空间解释。此外,地理相互作用动态及其成因对于我们预测大规模变化(如人为干扰)的影响至关重要。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Estimating the risk of species interaction loss in mutualistic communities.估计互惠共生群落中物种相互作用丧失的风险。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Aug 31;18(8):e3000843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000843. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: An environment-dependent approach.通过结构区分生态网络:一种依赖环境的方法。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 23;16(4):e1007787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007787. eCollection 2020 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
WHEN IS IT COEVOLUTION?何时是协同进化?
Evolution. 1980 May;34(3):611-612. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04849.x.
6
Downscaling pollen-transport networks to the level of individuals.将花粉传播网络细分为个体水平。
J Anim Ecol. 2014 Jan;83(1):306-17. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12130. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
8
Pollinator-mediated evolution of floral signals.传粉媒介介导的花信号进化。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 May;28(5):307-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
10
The dissimilarity of species interaction networks.物种相互作用网络的差异性。
Ecol Lett. 2012 Dec;15(12):1353-61. doi: 10.1111/ele.12002. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验