Trøjelsgaard Kristian, Jordano Pedro, Carstensen Daniel W, Olesen Jens M
Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Integrative Ecology Group, Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 7;282(1802). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2925.
Although species and their interactions in unison represent biodiversity and all the ecological and evolutionary processes associated with life, biotic interactions have, contrary to species, rarely been integrated into the concepts of spatial β-diversity. Here, we examine β-diversity of ecological networks by using pollination networks sampled across the Canary Islands. We show that adjacent and distant communities are more and less similar, respectively, in their composition of plants, pollinators and interactions than expected from random distributions. We further show that replacement of species is the major driver of interaction turnover and that this contribution increases with distance. Finally, we quantify that species-specific partner compositions (here called partner fidelity) deviate from random partner use, but vary as a result of ecological and geographical variables. In particular, breakdown of partner fidelity was facilitated by increasing geographical distance, changing abundances and changing linkage levels, but was not related to the geographical distribution of the species. This highlights the importance of space when comparing communities of interacting species and may stimulate a rethinking of the spatial interpretation of interaction networks. Moreover, geographical interaction dynamics and its causes are important in our efforts to anticipate effects of large-scale changes, such as anthropogenic disturbances.
尽管物种及其相互作用共同构成了生物多样性以及与生命相关的所有生态和进化过程,但与物种不同的是,生物相互作用很少被纳入空间β多样性的概念之中。在此,我们通过使用在加那利群岛采集的传粉网络来研究生态网络的β多样性。我们发现,相邻群落和遥远群落的植物、传粉者及其相互作用的组成分别比随机分布预期的更为相似和更不相似。我们进一步表明,物种替代是相互作用更替的主要驱动因素,且这种作用随着距离的增加而增强。最后,我们量化得出,物种特异性的伙伴组成(这里称为伙伴忠诚度)偏离了随机的伙伴利用情况,但会因生态和地理变量而有所不同。特别是,伙伴忠诚度的瓦解因地理距离增加、丰度变化和连接水平变化而加剧,但与物种的地理分布无关。这凸显了在比较相互作用物种群落时空间的重要性,并可能促使人们重新思考相互作用网络的空间解释。此外,地理相互作用动态及其成因对于我们预测大规模变化(如人为干扰)的影响至关重要。