Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Apr;25(4):954-961. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04590-x. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
Many patients who present for complex surgery have underlying medical comorbidities. While surgeons often refer these patients to medical appointments for preoperative "optimization" or "clearance," the actual impact of these visits remains poorly examined. The objective of the current study was to define the potential benefit of preoperative medical appointments on outcomes and costs associated with hepatopancreatic (HP) surgery.
Patients with modifiable comorbidities undergoing HP surgery were identified in the Medicare claims data. The association of preoperative non-surgical visit and postoperative outcomes and expenditures was assessed using inverse propensity treatment weighting analysis and multivariable logistic regression.
Among the 5574 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a hepatopancreatic surgery, one in seven patients (n = 830, 14.9%) was "optimized" preoperatively. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, age (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03; p = 0.006) and higher comorbidity burden (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.007) were associated with modest increased odds of being referred in the preoperative period for a non-surgical evaluation; the factor most associated with preoperative non-surgical visit was male patient sex (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.14-1.56; p < 0.001). After adjustment for competing risk factors and random site effect, patients with an "optimization" visit had 28% lower odds (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.86; p < 0.001) of experiencing an operative complication. Additionally, patients who had a non-surgical visit had 13% higher median total expenditures compared with individuals who did not undergo an "optimization" visit (p < 0.05).
In conclusion, roughly one in seven Medicare beneficiaries who underwent HP surgery may have been risk stratified by a non-surgical provider prior to surgery. Preoperative evaluation was associated with modestly lower odds of complications following HP surgery and higher Medicare expenditures. Further research is needed to determine its routine utility as a means to decrease the morbidity surrounding HP surgery.
许多接受复杂手术的患者都存在潜在的合并症。尽管外科医生通常会将这些患者转诊至医疗预约以进行术前“优化”或“清除”,但这些就诊的实际影响仍未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是确定术前医疗预约对与肝胆胰(HP)手术相关的结局和费用的潜在益处。
在 Medicare 索赔数据中确定了接受 HP 手术的可改变合并症患者。使用逆倾向治疗加权分析和多变量逻辑回归评估术前非手术就诊与术后结局和支出的关联。
在接受肝胆胰手术的 5574 名 Medicare 受益人中,有七分之一(n=830,14.9%)的患者在术前进行了“优化”。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,年龄(OR 1.02;95%CI 1.01-1.03;p=0.006)和更高的合并症负担(OR 1.03;95%CI 1.01-1.05;p=0.007)与术前接受非手术评估的可能性适度增加相关;与术前非手术就诊最相关的因素是男性患者性别(OR 1.33;95%CI 1.14-1.56;p<0.001)。在调整竞争风险因素和随机站点效应后,接受“优化”就诊的患者发生手术并发症的可能性降低 28%(OR 0.72;95%CI 0.59-0.86;p<0.001)。此外,与未接受“优化”就诊的患者相比,接受非手术就诊的患者的中位数总支出高出 13%(p<0.05)。
总之,接受 HP 手术的 Medicare 受益人中,约有七分之一可能在手术前已由非手术提供者进行风险分层。术前评估与 HP 手术后并发症的可能性适度降低和 Medicare 支出增加相关。需要进一步研究以确定其作为降低 HP 手术相关发病率的常规用途。