From the Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH.
Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):153-158. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004418. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
To define the association between hospital occupancy rate and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic (HP) resection.
Previous studies have sought to identify hospital-level characteristics associated with optimal surgical outcomes and decreased expenditures. The present study utilized a novel hospital quality metric coined "occupancy rate" based on publicly available data to assess differences in postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing HP procedures.
Medicare beneficiaries who underwent an elective HP surgery between 2013 and 2017 were identified. Occupancy rate was calculated and hospitals were categorized into quartiles. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess the association between occupancy rate and clinical outcomes.
Among 33,866 patients, the majority underwent a pancreatic resection (58.5%; n = 19,827), were male (88.4%; n = 7,488), or white (88.4%; n = 29,950); median age was 72 years [interquartile range (IQR): 68-77] and median Charleston Comorbidity Index was 3 (IQR 2-8). Hospitals were categorized into quartiles based on hospital occupancy rate (cutoffs: 48.1%, 59.4%, 68.2%). Most patients underwent an HP operation at a hospital with an above average occupancy rate (n = 20,865, 61.6%), whereas only a small subset of patients had an HP procedure at a low occupancy rate hospital (n = 1,218, 3.6%). On multivariable analysis, low hospital occupancy rate was associated with increased odds of a complication [(OR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-1.55) and 30-day mortality (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.27-1.97). Even among only high-volume HP hospitals, patients operated on at hospitals that had a low occupancy rate were at markedly higher risk of complications (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.03-1.97), as well as 30 day morality (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.27-3.83).
Among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing an elective HP resection, more than 1 in 4 hospitals performing HP surgeries utilized less than half of their beds on average. There was a monotonic relationship between hospital occupancy rate and the odds ofexperiencing a complication, as well as 30-day mortality, independent of other hospital level characteristics including procedural volume.
确定医院入住率与接受肝胆胰 (HP) 切除术患者术后结局之间的关联。
先前的研究试图确定与最佳手术结果和降低支出相关的医院水平特征。本研究利用基于公开数据的新医院质量指标“入住率”,评估了 Medicare 受益人群接受 HP 手术的术后结局差异。
确定了 2013 年至 2017 年间接受择期 HP 手术的 Medicare 受益人群。计算入住率并将医院分为四分位组。多变量逻辑回归用于评估入住率与临床结局之间的关联。
在 33866 名患者中,大多数患者接受了胰腺切除术 (58.5%;n=19827)、男性 (88.4%;n=7488) 或白人 (88.4%;n=29950);中位年龄为 72 岁[四分位距 (IQR):68-77],Charleston 合并症指数中位数为 3(IQR 2-8)。根据医院入住率将医院分为四分位组(截距:48.1%、59.4%、68.2%)。大多数患者在入住率高于平均水平的医院接受 HP 手术(n=20865,61.6%),而只有一小部分患者在入住率低的医院接受 HP 手术(n=1218,3.6%)。多变量分析显示,医院入住率低与并发症发生的几率增加相关[比值比 (OR)1.35,95%置信区间 (CI)1.18-1.55)和 30 天死亡率 (OR1.58,95%CI1.27-1.97)]。即使在仅进行高容量 HP 手术的医院中,在入住率低的医院接受手术的患者发生并发症的风险也明显更高(OR1.42,95%CI1.03-1.97),30 天死亡率也更高(OR2.20,95%CI1.27-3.83)。
在接受择期 HP 切除术的 Medicare 受益人群中,超过 1/4 进行 HP 手术的医院平均使用率不到一半。医院入住率与发生并发症和 30 天死亡率的几率之间呈单调关系,独立于其他医院水平特征,包括手术量。