Department of Biochemistry and Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.
Internal Medicine Unit, Psychiatry Division, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 21;20(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02040-5.
Research ethics is required for high-quality research that positively influences society. There is limited understanding of research ethics in Middle Eastern countries including Jordan. Here, we aim to investigate the level of understanding of research ethics principles among health sciences faculty members in Jordan.
This is a cross sectional study where faculty members from the University of Jordan were surveyed for their knowledge and, attitude of research ethics principles. The study was conducted in the period between July 2016 to July 2017 using a customized-design questionnaire involving demographic data and participants' contributions toward research, and assessment of participants' knowledge, belief and attitude towards research ethics. Different question-formats have been used including multiple-choice, yes or no, and a four point Likert-type questions. Obtained responses were tabulated according to gender, academic-rank, and knowledge about research ethics principles.
The study had a response rate of 51%. Among the 137 participants of this study, most (96%) were involved in human and animal research, yet, only 2/3 had prior training in research ethics. Moreover, 91% believed that investigators should have training in research ethics and 87% believed that there should be a mandatory postgraduate course on that. The average correct scores for correct understanding of researchers towards research ethics was 62%. Yet, there were some misconceptions about the major ethical principles as only 43% identified them correctly. Additionally, the role of research ethics committees was not well understood by most of the respondents.
Although there is acceptable knowledge about research ethics, discrepancies in understanding in research ethics principles seems to exist. There is a large support for further training in responsible conduct of research by faculty in health sciences in Jordan. Thus, such training should be required by universities to address this knowledge gap in order to improve research quality and its impact on society.
高质量的研究对社会具有积极影响,需要符合研究伦理规范。包括约旦在内的中东国家对研究伦理规范的认识有限。本研究旨在调查约旦卫生科学领域教师对研究伦理规范原则的理解程度。
这是一项横断面研究,对约旦大学的教师进行了调查,了解他们对研究伦理规范原则的知识和态度。该研究于 2016 年 7 月至 2017 年 7 月期间进行,使用了一份定制设计的问卷,涉及人口统计学数据和参与者对研究的贡献,以及评估参与者对研究伦理的知识、信念和态度。使用了不同的问题格式,包括多项选择题、是或否题以及四点李克特量表题。根据性别、学术职称和对研究伦理规范原则的了解,对获得的回答进行了分类。
该研究的回复率为 51%。在这项研究的 137 名参与者中,大多数(96%)参与了人体和动物研究,但只有 2/3 的人接受过研究伦理培训。此外,91%的人认为调查人员应该接受研究伦理培训,87%的人认为应该开设研究生必修课程。正确理解研究人员对研究伦理的平均正确得分是 62%。然而,对于主要伦理原则存在一些误解,只有 43%的人正确识别了这些原则。此外,大多数受访者对研究伦理委员会的作用并不了解。
尽管对研究伦理有可接受的认识,但在研究伦理规范原则的理解上存在差异。约旦卫生科学领域的教师对进一步培训有很大的需求,以负责任的方式进行研究。因此,大学应该要求教师接受此类培训,以解决这一知识差距,从而提高研究质量及其对社会的影响。