Jost Jiri, Havlisova Helena, Bilkova Zuzana, Stefankova Zuzana, Zemkova Ludmila
1Department of Special Education, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Education, Dukelska 9, CZ 370 01 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2017 Sep 30;11(2):163-171. doi: 10.1007/s40653-017-0195-3. eCollection 2018 Jun.
The antisaccadic task is sensitive to what is called frontal dysfunction, i.e. dysfunction of the frontal lobes of the cerebral cortex which are the basis for a wide range of symptoms. The present study examined saccadic eye movements in adolescents with persistent history of maltreatment. Participants included 17 female subjects with maltreatment history. The control group consisted of 54 typically developing female subjects. All participants were administered Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and saccadic eye movement tests. CBCL showed significant differences between the maltreated and control groups. The prosaccadic test revealed insignificant results between both groups. The antisaccadic test revealed a highly significant difference (longer latencies, more prosaccadic mistakes in the group of maltreated subjects). Antisaccadic eye movements may be regarded as a possible indicator of persistent maltreatment and following emotional and behavioral problems and may therefore enhance diagnostic methods.
反扫视任务对所谓的额叶功能障碍敏感,即大脑皮层额叶功能障碍,这是多种症状的基础。本研究检查了有长期虐待史青少年的扫视眼动。参与者包括17名有虐待史的女性受试者。对照组由54名发育正常的女性受试者组成。所有参与者都接受了儿童行为量表(CBCL)和扫视眼动测试。CBCL显示受虐待组和对照组之间存在显著差异。顺向扫视测试显示两组之间结果无显著差异。反扫视测试显示出高度显著的差异(受虐待组的潜伏期更长,顺向扫视错误更多)。反扫视眼动可能被视为持续虐待及后续情绪和行为问题的一个可能指标,因此可能会改进诊断方法。