Suppr超能文献

现实生活中经支气管超声引导针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)的诊断准确性

Diagnostic Accuracy of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in Real Life.

作者信息

Murthi Mukunthan, Donna Elio, Arias Sixto, Villamizar Nestor R, Nguyen Dao M, Holt Gregory E, Mirsaeidi Mehdi S

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Miami VA Medical Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Miami VA Medical Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Apr 7;7:118. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00118. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

EBUS-TBNA is an integral tool in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer and other diseases involving mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Most studies attesting to the performance of EBUS-TBNA are prospective analyses performed under strict protocols. The objective of our study was to compare the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA to surgery in diagnosing hilar and mediastinal pathologies in a tertiary hospital, staffed by pulmonologists with and without formal interventional pulmonary training. We retrospectively analyzed subjects who underwent EBUS-TBNA followed by a confirmatory surgical procedure from January 2012 to December 2018. The primary outcome was to evaluate the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of all mediastinal disease. Secondary analyses determined the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in cancer, NSCLC, and non-malignant lesions individually. One hundred and forty-three subjects had an EBUS-TBNA procedure followed by surgery. EBUS-TBNA for all pathologies had an accuracy of 81.2% (CI 95% 73.8-87.4) and sensitivity of 55.1% (CI 95% 41.5-68.3). The accuracy and sensitivity of individual groups were: cancer (81.7, 48.8%), NSCLC (84, 48.3%), and non-malignancy (78.9, 60%). The NSCLC group had 15 false negatives and 5 (33.3%) of them were due to non-sampling of EBUS accessible nodes. Missed sampling led to a change in the final staging in 8.6% of NSCLC subjects. The accuracy of EBUS-TBNA across all groups was comparable to those reported previously. However, the sensitivity was comparatively lower. This was primarily due to the large number of EBUS-TBNA accessible lymph nodes that were not sampled. This data highlights the need for guidelines outlining the best sampling approach and lymph node selection.

摘要

超声支气管镜引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)是肺癌及其他累及纵隔淋巴结病变的诊断和分期中的一项重要工具。大多数证实EBUS-TBNA性能的研究都是在严格方案下进行的前瞻性分析。我们研究的目的是在一家由有或没有正规介入肺脏病学培训的肺科医生组成的三级医院中,比较EBUS-TBNA与手术在诊断肺门和纵隔病变方面的准确性。我们回顾性分析了2012年1月至2018年12月期间接受EBUS-TBNA并随后进行确诊性手术的受试者。主要结局是评估EBUS-TBNA在诊断所有纵隔疾病中的准确性。次要分析分别确定了EBUS-TBNA在癌症、非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和非恶性病变中的准确性。143名受试者接受了EBUS-TBNA检查并随后进行了手术。EBUS-TBNA对所有病变的诊断准确性为81.2%(95%置信区间73.8-87.4),敏感性为55.1%(95%置信区间41.5-68.3)。各个组的准确性和敏感性分别为:癌症(81.7,48.8%)、NSCLC(84,48.3%)和非恶性病变(78.9,60%)。NSCLC组有15例假阴性,其中5例(33.3%)是由于EBUS可及淋巴结未采样。采样遗漏导致8.6%的NSCLC受试者最终分期改变。所有组中EBUS-TBNA的准确性与先前报道的相当。然而,敏感性相对较低。这主要是由于大量EBUS可及的淋巴结未被采样。该数据凸显了制定概述最佳采样方法和淋巴结选择的指南的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c85/7154097/92b9eeee6a0b/fmed-07-00118-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验