Suppr超能文献

全科医疗中咽炎的临床评估

Clinical assessment of pharyngitis in general practice.

作者信息

Hjortdahl P, Laerum E, Mowinckel P

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 1988 Nov;6(4):219-23. doi: 10.3109/02813438809009320.

Abstract

The present study investigates the feasibility of the clinical differentiation between patients with beta-haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis from those with pharyngitis caused by other agents, based on the patients' symptoms, symptom duration, and the clinical findings. Twenty-four general practitioners recruited 225 patients for the study. Fifty-six patients had positive and 169 patients negative group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal throat cultures. Twenty-two patients in the streptococcal group and 76 patients in the non-streptococcal group were initially correctly diagnosed based on an overall clinical assessment (sensitivity 0.39, specificity 0.55 and accuracy 0.51). This is as accurate as "flipping a coin". Similar figures were found with regard to the individual symptoms (accuracy 0.38-0.68) and clinical findings (accuracy 0.36-0.65). Taking the duration of symptoms into account and applying discriminant function analysis did not significantly improve these figures. In order to obtain a sufficiently accurate diagnosis in general practice, the use of the new rapid agglutination test for streptococcal identification is recommended.

摘要

本研究基于患者的症状、症状持续时间及临床检查结果,探讨区分β-溶血性链球菌性咽炎患者与其他病原体所致咽炎患者的临床可行性。24名全科医生招募了225名患者参与本研究。56名患者A组β-溶血性链球菌咽培养结果为阳性,169名患者为阴性。基于全面临床评估,链球菌组22名患者和非链球菌组76名患者最初得到正确诊断(敏感性0.39,特异性0.55,准确性0.51)。这和“抛硬币”一样准确。在个体症状(准确性0.38 - 0.68)和临床检查结果(准确性0.36 - 0.65)方面也发现了类似的数据。考虑症状持续时间并应用判别函数分析,这些数据并未显著改善。为了在全科医疗中获得足够准确的诊断,建议使用新型快速凝集试验来鉴定链球菌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验