Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203277. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3277.
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neoplasm requiring rapid access to subspecialized multidisciplinary care. For this reason, insurance coverage such as Medicaid may be associated with oncologic outcomes in this disproportionately economically vulnerable population. With Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, it is important to understand outcomes associated with Medicaid coverage among patients with SCLC.
To determine the association of Medicaid coverage with survival compared with other insurance statuses.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included adult patients with limited-stage (LS) and extensive-stage (ES) SCLC in the US National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2013. Data were analyzed in January 2019.
Patients were analyzed with respect to insurance status. Associations of insurance status with survival were interrogated with univariate analyses, multivariable analyses, and propensity score matching.
A total of 181 784 patients with SCLC (93 131 [51.2%] female; median [interquartile range] age; 67 [60-75] years for patients with LS-SCLC and 68 [60-75] years for patients with ES-SCLC) were identified, of whom 70 247 (38.6%) had LS-SCLC and 109 479 (60.2%) had ES-SCLC. On univariate analyses of patients with LS-SCLC, Medicaid coverage was not associated with a survival advantage compared with being uninsured (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.08; P = .49). Likewise, on multivariable analyses of patients with ES-SCLC, compared with being uninsured, Medicaid coverage was not associated with a survival advantage (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.03; P = .78). After propensity score matching, median survival was similar between the uninsured and Medicaid groups both among patients with LS-SCLC (14.4 vs 14.1 months; hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98-1.12; P = .17) and those with ES-SCLC (6.3 vs 6.4 months; hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.04; P = .92).
Despite of billions of dollars in annual federal and state spending, Medicaid was not associated with improved survival in patients with SCLC compared with being uninsured in the US National Cancer Database. These findings suggest that there are substantial outcome inequalities for SCLC relevant to the policy debate on the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act.
小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是一种侵袭性肿瘤,需要快速获得专业的多学科治疗。因此,医疗补助等保险覆盖范围可能与这个经济上处于不利地位的人群的肿瘤学结果相关。随着平价医疗法案(Affordable Care Act)下医疗补助的扩大,了解 SCLC 患者中与医疗补助覆盖范围相关的结果非常重要。
确定医疗补助覆盖范围与生存之间的关联,与其他保险状况相比。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究纳入了美国国家癌症数据库中 2004 年至 2013 年期间患有局限性(LS)和广泛性(ES)小细胞肺癌的成年患者。数据分析于 2019 年 1 月进行。
根据保险状况对患者进行分析。使用单变量分析、多变量分析和倾向评分匹配来探究保险状况与生存的关联。
共纳入 181784 例 SCLC 患者(93131[51.2%]名女性;LS-SCLC 患者的中位[四分位间距]年龄为 67[60-75]岁,ES-SCLC 患者为 68[60-75]岁),其中 70247 例(38.6%)为 LS-SCLC,109479 例(60.2%)为 ES-SCLC。在 LS-SCLC 患者的单变量分析中,与没有保险相比,医疗补助覆盖范围与生存优势无关(风险比,1.02;95%置信区间,0.96-1.08;P=0.49)。同样,在 ES-SCLC 患者的多变量分析中,与没有保险相比,医疗补助覆盖范围与生存优势无关(风险比,1.00;95%置信区间,0.96-1.03;P=0.78)。在倾向评分匹配后,LS-SCLC 患者中,无保险组和医疗补助组的中位生存期相似(14.4 个月比 14.1 个月;风险比,1.05;95%置信区间,0.98-1.12;P=0.17);ES-SCLC 患者中,中位生存期也相似(6.3 个月比 6.4 个月;风险比,1.00;95%置信区间,0.96-1.04;P=0.92)。
尽管每年有数十亿美元的联邦和州政府支出,但与没有保险的患者相比,医疗补助并没有改善美国国家癌症数据库中 SCLC 患者的生存情况。这些发现表明,与平价医疗法案下医疗补助扩大的政策辩论相关,SCLC 患者的结果存在实质性的不平等。