Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Qingdao Six-Eight Nearby Sci-Tech Company, Qingdao, China.
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1469-1474. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25920. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
The whole world has entered a terrible crisis with a huge and increasing number of human deaths and economic losses in fighting the pandemic of COVID-19 caused by the novel coronavirus termed SARS-CoV-2. The live pathogen vaccine (LPV) strategy, which originated in ancient China for fighting smallpox, has been applied successfully by US military recruits for decades to control acute respiratory diseases caused by types 4 and 7 adenoviruses. This strategy has also been widely employed in veterinary medicine. These facts suggest a fast way out of the current pandemic crisis, namely that SARS-CoV-2 could be directly used as a live vaccine. Beyond the two traditional mechanisms to guarantee the LPV's safety (the LPV seed strain is properly selected; the LPV is inoculated bypassing the respiratory sites of pathology), three novel mechanisms to further ensure the LPV's safety are available (the virus replication is inhibited with early use of an antiviral drug; symptomatic LPV recipients are cured with convalescent plasma; the LPV is inoculated in the hot season). This LPV strategy has multiple potential advantages over other options and could reduce morbidity and mortality greatly as well as the economic loss caused by the pandemic. The safety and efficacy of this strategy should be investigated strictly using animal experiments and clinical trials, and even if the experiments and trials all support the strategy, it should be implemented with enough caution.
全世界在应对由新型冠状病毒 SARS-CoV-2 引起的 COVID-19 大流行的过程中,面临着巨大的人类死亡和经济损失,情况非常严峻。活病原体疫苗(LPV)策略源自中国古代防治天花的方法,几十年来,美国军方一直在新兵中成功应用该策略来控制由 4 型和 7 型腺病毒引起的急性呼吸道疾病。该策略也已在兽医领域广泛应用。这些事实表明,我们有一条快速摆脱当前大流行危机的途径,即直接将 SARS-CoV-2 用作活疫苗。除了保证 LPV 安全性的两个传统机制(选择适当的 LPV 种子株;接种 LPV 绕过病理呼吸道部位)外,还有三种新的机制可进一步保证 LPV 的安全性(早期使用抗病毒药物抑制病毒复制;使用恢复期血浆治愈有症状的 LPV 受种者;在流行季节接种 LPV)。与其他选择相比,LPV 策略具有多个潜在优势,可以大大降低发病率和死亡率以及大流行造成的经济损失。应严格通过动物实验和临床试验来调查该策略的安全性和有效性,即使实验和临床试验都支持该策略,也应该谨慎实施。