Siksha O Anusandhan University, Institute of Dental Sciences, Department of Periodontics & Oral implantology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Private Practice, Bhubaneswar, India.
Braz Oral Res. 2020 Apr 17;34:e034. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0034. eCollection 2020.
The aim of this split mouth, double blinded, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of use of Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the treatment of periodontal pockets. Twenty six patients (15 males, 11 females) diagnosed with generalized periodontitis with Pocket Depth > 5mm and plaque index score < 1.5, were randomly allocated by using computer generated random sequence, into two groups, one treated with intra-pocket application of PRGF adjunct to SRP and other with SRP alone. The clinical outcomes like pocket depth (PD), relative attachment level (RAL) and sulcus bleeding index (SBI) were assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Twenty two patients (44 sites) were analyzed at the end of 6 month follow-up, using SPSS 20.0v software. There was a significant statistical difference observed between both the groups favouring SRP +PRGF group in terms of PD (p = 0.007) and RAL (p = 0.021) at the end of 6 month follow-up. Also there was a statistical significant difference (< 0.001) at all time points compared to baseline, for all parameters in intra-group comparison. Moreover, the sites with PD>4mm necessitating further treatment after 6-month follow-up were significantly lesser for SRP+PRGF group. The use of PRGF technology in non-surgical periodontal therapy, by single intra-pocket application in to periodontal pockets as an adjunct to SRP, in chronic periodontitis patients, was found to be effective in reduction of pocket depth and gain in clinical attachment level.
本单盲、随机对照临床试验的目的是评估富血小板纤维蛋白(PRGF)作为牙周袋内辅助治疗深度刮治和根面平整术(SRP)的临床疗效。选择 26 名男性 15 名,女性 11 名)患有广泛牙周炎,探诊深度> 5mm 且菌斑指数评分< 1.5,采用计算机生成的随机序列将其随机分配到两组中,一组接受牙周袋内 PRGF 辅助 SRP 治疗,另一组仅接受 SRP 治疗。在基线、3 个月和 6 个月时评估临床结果,如探诊深度(PD)、相对附着水平(RAL)和龈沟出血指数(SBI)。在 6 个月的随访结束时,使用 SPSS 20.0v 软件分析了 22 名患者(44 个部位)。在 6 个月的随访结束时,两组之间存在显著的统计学差异,SRP+PRGF 组在 PD(p = 0.007)和 RAL(p = 0.021)方面具有统计学优势。在所有时间点与基线相比,组内比较的所有参数均存在统计学显著差异(< 0.001)。此外,在 SRP+PRGF 组中,在 6 个月的随访后需要进一步治疗的 PD>4mm 的部位明显较少。在慢性牙周炎患者中,将 PRGF 技术单次应用于牙周袋内作为 SRP 的辅助治疗,用于非手术性牙周治疗,可有效减少探诊深度和增加临床附着水平。